|















Search chap/verse
Search word: Retrieve verses, illustrations, etc |

| |
INDEX FOR 2CORINTHIANS
2Corinthians 3:18
<>
2Corinthians 4:3-4
|
COLLECTIONS
Commentaries,
Word Studies, Devotionals, Sermons, Illustrations
Old and New Testament. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2
Corinthians 4:1 Commentary |
|
2 Corinthians
4:1 Therefore
*, since we
have
this
ministry, as we
received mercy,
we do not
lose heart (NASB:
Lockman) |
|
Greek:
Dia
touto,
echontes
ten
diakonian
tauten,
kathos
eleethemen,
ouk
egkakoumen,
Amplified: THEREFORE, SINCE we do hold and engage in this
ministry by the mercy of God [granting us favor, benefits,
opportunities, and especially salvation], we do not get discouraged
(spiritless and despondent with fear) or become faint with weariness
and exhaustion.
(Lockman)
Barclay:
Since therefore this part of God’s service has been given to us, even
as we have received mercy, we do not lose heart.
(Westminster
Press)
God's Word: We don't become discouraged, since God has given us
this ministry through his mercy. (GWT)
Easy English: God in his *mercy has given us this work to do. As a
result, we do not lose hope.
ESV: Therefore, having
this ministry by the mercy of God, we do not lose heart. (ESV)
KJV: Therefore seeing we have this ministry, as we have
received mercy, we faint not;
NET: Therefore, since we have this ministry, just as God has
shown us mercy, we do not become discouraged. (NET
Bible)
NIV: Therefore, since through God’s mercy we have this
ministry, we do not lose heart.
(NIV
- IBS)
NLT: Therefore, since God in his mercy has given us this
new way, we never give up.. (NLT
- Tyndale House)
Phillips: This is the ministry of the new agreement which God
in his mercy has given us and nothing can daunt us. (Phillips:
Touchstone)
Weymouth: Therefore, being engaged in this service and being
mindful of the mercy which has been shown us, we are not cowards.
Wuest: Because of this, having this ministry [of the new
testament] even as we were made the objects of mercy [in its
bestowal], we do not lose courage, (Eerdmans)
Young's Literal: Because of this, having this ministration,
according as we did receive kindness, we do not faint, |
|
|
|
|
THEREFORE, SINCE WE HAVE THIS
MINISTRY, AS WE RECEIVED MERCY, WE DO NOT LOSE HEART: Dia touto, echontes (PAPMPN)
ten diakonian tauten, kathos eleethemen, (1PAPI) ouk egkakoumen, (1PPAI):
(Since: 2Co 3:6,12 5:18 Eph 3:7,8) (As: 1Co 7:25 1Ti 1:13 1Pe
2:10) (We do not lose heart: 2Co 4:16 Isa 40:30 Ga 6:9 Eph 3:13 Php
4:13 2Th 3:13 Heb 12:3 Rev 2:3)
Alfred Plummer feels that...
Here again, as between chapters 1 and 2,
the division of chapters is unintelligently made. The first six verses of
this chapter belong to the preceding one, and the close connexion between
the two paragraphs is obvious: the opening verses of this chapter show how
close it is, for the Apostle is still urging the claims of his office,
especially against those who charge him with insincerity and
self-commendation.
The six verses run in couplets; the glory
of the new ministry (2Co 4:1, 2); the condition of those who are too blind
to see the glory of the Gospel (2Co 4:3, 4); the source of the glory (2Co
4:5, 6). A fresh departure is made at 2Co 4:7. With 2Co 4:1-6 compare 1Th 2:1-12, which is a
similar vindication of Apostolic authority on behalf of St Paul and his
colleagues, and contains several similar expressions. (Plummer,
Alfred. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Second Epistle of St.
Paul to the Corinthians. New York: Scribner. 1915)
William Barclay has an
interesting introduction to this
chapter noting that...
Paul says that he never loses heart in
the great task that has been given to him, and by implication he tell us
why. Two things keep him going. (a) There is the consciousness of a great
task. A man who is conscious of a great task can do amazing things. One of
the great works of musical genius is Handel’s Messiah. It is on record that
the whole work was composed and written down in twenty-two days, and that
during all that time Handel would scarcely consent to eat or to sleep. A
great task brings its own strength with it. (b) There is the memory of mercy
received. It was Paul’s aim to spend all his life seeking to do something
for the love which had redeemed him (Ed: Not to "pay God back" but
motivated by loving gratitude and empowered by His indwelling Spirit).
(Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series. The Westminster Press)
Therefore reflects the combination
of two Greek words (dia touto) which together signify a term of conclusion
and are rendered for this reason, because of this or
therefore.
Dia touto - This idiom is used
some 46 times in the NT - Mt 6:25 12:27 31 13:13 52 14:2 18:23 21:43 23:14
23:34 24:44 Mk 6:14 11:24 12:24 Lk 11:19 12:22 Jn 1:31 5:16 18 6:65 7:22
8:47 9:23 10:17 12:39 13:11 15:19 16:15 19:11 Ac 2:26 Ro 5:12 2Co 4:1 7:13
13:10 Ep 1:15 5:17 6:13 Col 1:9 1Th 3:7 Philemon 1:15 He 1:9 2:1 1Jn 3:1 4:5
Rev 7:15 12:12
Therefore - Refers back to the previous
chapter in which Paul presented a superb synopsis of the surpassing glory of
the ministry under the New Covenant as compared to the ministry of Moses
under the Old Covenant. Alford feels this specifically "refers to
the previous description of the freeness and unveiledness of the ministry of
the Gospel."
Hughes adds that this New Covenant
ministry so surpasses the Old Covenant because...
it effects a removal of the veil of
unbelief, the liberation of the Holy Spirit, and transformation into the
image of the Lord. Having a ministry of such splendor left Paul with no
place for faintheartedness but only for boldness (cf. 2Co 3:12).
John MacArthur sees the "therefore"
as pointing back to 2Co 3:18 commenting that...
Strength to endure trials comes from the
unveiled look into the face of Christ made possible under the New Covenant.
That look was also the source of strength for Paul’s new covenant ministry.
We have this ministry - The
present tense
(have) speaks of
this ministry as Paul's continual possession. But what is "this ministry"?
What ministry? Paul had just reminded the saints that the
ministry (diakonia) of the New
Covenant which he had received (1Ti 1:12, Ac 9:15) was "the ministry
(diakonia) of the Spirit" (2Co 3:8) and in chapter 5 adds that it
was
"the ministry of reconciliation" (2Co 5:18). He also succinctly
documented the superiority of the New Covenant ministry compared to
the Old Covenant ministry of Moses. (See
chart summarizing the superior nature of the New Covenant)
A T Robertson feels that the use
of the plural ("we") is the so-called literary plural and adds "Can
he not speak for all of us?" Some feel that "we" instead of "I" is
an expression of Paul's humility, which is a reasonable interpretation in
view of the personal way in which he is forced to defend his ministry.
Note that "we have this ministry"
implies that it was something he had received. It was a gift from God, a
gift that was grounded in God's great mercy. None of us receive ministry
based on anything meritorious we have done, and Paul never lost sight of
this great truth. In his last written communication (2Timothy) we read...
Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by
the will of God, according to the promise of life in Christ Jesus (2Ti
1:1-note)
Ministry (1248)(diakonia)
means the rendering or assistance or help by performing certain duties,
often of a humble or menial nature serve, including such mundane activities
as waiting on tables or caring for household needs—activities without
apparent dignity.
Diakonia - Used 7x in 2Corinthians -2Co 5:18; 6:3; 8:4; 9:1, 12-13;
11:8
It is good to remember
the cultural
context
for in Grecian through diakonia was not a
dignified term. The service associated with diakonia involved
dependence, submission, and constraints of time and freedom, which cause the
Greeks to regard diakonia as degrading and dishonorable. Service for
the public good was honored, but
voluntary giving of oneself in service of
one’s fellow man is alien to Greek thought. The highest goal before a man
was the development of his own personality.
(Brown,
Colin, Editor. New International Dictionary of NT Theology. 1986. Zondervan
or
Computer version)
To the Greek mind, mundane service was not considered to be a proper
purpose for a man's life. The formula of the sophist expressed the prevalent
Greek philosophy -- "How can a man be happy when he has to serve someone?".
Paul would likely respond "How can a man be blessed unless he is a
servant of all?" (cp Acts 20:35)
Surprisingly, Judaism had no philosophy
of ministry involving diakonia. Instead, Judaism adopted a philosophy
of service not unlike that of the Greeks. If service was rendered at all, it
was done as an act of social obligation or as an act to those more worthy. A
superior would not stoop to become a servant! Though Judaism in the time of
Jesus knew and practiced its social responsibilities, e.g., to the poor,
this was done mainly by alms, not by service (cf. Lk 10:30-35). Lowly
service such as waiting on tables, was beneath the dignity of a free man
(cf. Lk 7:44ff). Sometimes, the "greater" would wait on a table, but this
was unusual. Thus Jesus' example introduced a radical new attitude toward
diakonia.
In the NT, a diakonos is one who by choice comes under the
authority of his Master and who serves even as did His Master (Mk 10:45, cp
1Co 4:16 11:1). Paul emphasized this philosophy of ministry in his parting
words to the Ephesian elders (Acts 20:17) declaring...
I esteem my
life of absolutely no account as precious to myself in order that I [like a
Greek athlete] may finish my race, even the ministering work (diakonia)
which I received from the presence of the Lord Jesus (Ac 9:15 16 22:21 26:17
18) to bear testimony to the good news of the grace of God. (Acts 20:24
Wuest's Translation)
Comment: Beloved we are
all called to be in a ministry of some sort (we are certainly called to bear
testimony of the good news of the grace of God with our life and our lips -
cp 1Pe 2:9-note),
for all believers are called to walk in Jesus' steps (1Pe 2:21-note),
in a life of service to others (Php 2:5, 6, 7- note).
Given that this ministry is a "race" and we each get only one opportunity
(~one life) to run the course, the question is...Beloved,
how are you running? Have you
laid aside the encumbrances (non-essentials, not bad things, just not the
best things) of this life and the sin which so easily entangles you? Are you
running with endurance? (Heb 12:1-note,
It's too soon to quit - see Gal 6:7-note,
Ga 6:8-note,
Ga 6:9, 10-note)
Are you fixing your eyes on Jesus (Heb 12:2-note),
learning to strive according to His power which mightily works within you?
(Col 1:29-note)
Are you running in such a way that you might not be disqualified (not loss
of salvation, but loss of reward - cp 1Co 3:15, 2Jn 1:8 2Co 5:10-note)?
(1Co 9:24-note,
1Co 9:25-note,
1Co 9:26-note,
1Co 9:27-note,
2Ti 2:5-note)
In Acts 21 Paul presents a proper
perspective for ministry writing...
And after he had greeted them (Ac 21:17,
18), he began to relate one by one the things which God had done
among the Gentiles through his ministry (diakonia). (Acts 21:19)
Comment: (1) Paul's ministry was
but a conduit of what God did through him, and so it is still true in all of
us who are called to be "ministers" of the Lord, even if not formally. (2)
The first thing Paul did after greeting them was to give testimony to the
great things the Lord had done, a good motif for all God's ministers to seek
to emulate. What we "do" is natural but what God does through us is
supernatural. Can you glorify your Father by telling others "one by one the
things" He has done through your ministry, His Spirit working in and through
you to point others to Jesus?
We r eceived mercy (1653)
(eleeo
from
eleos [word study]) means to feel sympathy
with the misery of another, especially such sympathy which manifests itself
in deeds (action), less frequently in words. It describes the general sense
of one who expresses compassion to someone in need. Mercy is a concern
for an afflicted person that prompts one to give help. God's grace gives us
what we don't deserve and His mercy does not give us what we do deserve.
Writing to Timothy Paul gave a
parallel description of mercy he had received...
But that (see
context
1Ti 1:15) is why
God had mercy on me, so that Christ Jesus could use me as a
prime example (model) of his great patience with even the worst sinners
(Paul considered himself a "living epistle" testifying that God could save
any sinner - what a mercy filled God!). Then others will realize that they,
too, can believe in Him and receive eternal life. (1Ti 1:16, original NLT)
Jnann Bengel...
The mercy of God, through which this
ministry is received, makes us zealous and sincere ministers. Even Moses
obtained mercy, and thereby found so near access, Ex 33:19. (The
Critical English Testament)
Paul's acknowledgment of his receipt of
(and need for) mercy is a reflection of his continuing attitude of humility
and dependence on God, recognizing that his holy calling as an apostle was
not due to his works but was a result of his having received mercy.
A debtor to mercy alone,
Of covenant mercy I sing;
Nor fear, with Thy righteousness on,
My person and offering to bring;
The terrors of law and of God
With me can have nothing to do;
My Saviour's obedience and blood
Hide all my transgressions from view.
Augustus M. Toplady
Vincent writes that eleeo
means
to succor or to show compassion...The
(root) word (eleos)
emphasizes the misery with which grace deals; hence, peculiarly the sense of
human wretchedness coupled with the impulse to relieve it, which issues in
gracious ministry. Bengel remarks, “Grace takes away the fault, mercy the
misery.”
While the Dispenser of the mercy is not
stated, this is certainly an allusion to the bestowal of bountiful mercy
from our great "God (Who is) merciful and gracious, slow to anger and
abundant in lovingkindness and truth." (Ps 86:15) (See discussion of
God's attribute of
Mercy)
Phillip Towner adds that
Mercy (is) the Foundation of God's
Covenant (Ed: Including the New Covenant). Mercy and
hesed (word study)
[חֶסֶד , חֶסֶד], God's
covenant love, are integrally related. So close is the relationship that
hesed [חֶסֶד , חֶסֶד] sometimes is to be viewed in terms of mercy. In this
relationship, mercy then comes to be seen as the quality in God that directs
Him to forge a relationship with people who absolutely do not deserve to be
in relationship with Him. Mercy is manifested in God's activity on behalf of
His people to free them from slavery...The pattern of God's dealings with
people in the Old Testament, at the core of which is mercy, also provides
the shape for understanding his dealings in the New Testament. God desires a
relationship with humankind, but must show mercy to them in order for this
relationship to be built. Of course, the New Testament expounds the theme of
God's mercy in the light of Christ (cp 2Co 4:6-note), the supreme expression of
love, mercy, and grace. (Ed: And this is the "Light" that radically
impacted Saul on the road to Damascus Ac 9:3, 9:4, 9:5 the merciful Light he
never grew tired of praising and proclaiming.) (Mercy
- Baker's Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology -
Recommended Reading)
Spurgeon describes God's mercy
as His...
tender attribute (which) sweetens the
grand thought of His power: the divine strength will not crush us, but will
be used for our good (and His
glory. Amen!). (The
Attributes of God - Spurgeon)
Matthew Henry has a good reminder
that...
The best of men would faint, if they did
not receive mercy from God. And that mercy which has helped us out, and
helped us on, hitherto, we may rely upon to help us even to the end. (Amen!)
Paul understood God's great
mercy (1Pe 1:3-note)
for he of all people had been in desperate need of mercy before
salvation (Acts 8:1, 3, 9:3, 4, 5, 6, 22:4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 10 26:9 10 11 12
12 14 15 16 17 18 19) and thereafter Paul never forgot God's saving mercy,
living in daily dependence on and thankfulness for this same divine mercy
that saved him on the Damascus Road.
Do you live daily with a similar sense
of great gratitude for having been shown such great mercy from so great a
God? The longer Paul was a
recipient of God's mercy, the greater was his sense of humility as he
"progressed" from an apostle "not fit to be called an apostle" (1Co
15:9-note
~55AD), to "the very least of all saints" (Ep 3:8-note
~61AD) to the foremost of sinners (1Ti 1:15 - 63-66AD)
Hughes comments that...
the combination of this mercy and
the astonishingly surpassing glory of his (New Covenant) ministry
heartened him and kept him from losing heart. in weakness...
Spurgeon was right in delineating
discouragement as one of the ministry’s great risks. Loss of heart can bring
disaster. But these two things will ground our hearts: 1) God’s merciful
call, and 2) the surpassing glory of the gospel ministry.
He stands in Christ’s stead; his message
is the Word of God; around him are immortal souls; the Saviour, unseen, is
beside him; the Holy Spirit broods over the congregation; angels gaze upon
the scene; and heaven and hell await the issue” (Matthew Simpson).
What glory! How heartening!
(Hughes,
R. K. 2 Corinthians: Power in Weakness. Preaching the Word. Crossway
or
Logos
or
Wordsearch)
We do not - The Greek word for "not" (ou/ouk) indicates
absolute negation. Paul says we absolutely in no way are losing heart, we
are not becoming discouraged or despondent with fear and we are not becoming
faint with weariness and exhaustion. The
present tense
indicates that this is his abiding attitude in spite of the challenges to
his character and conduct by the false teachers.
Beloved, have you ever been falsely
accused or had your motives for ministry impugned or unfairly questioned?
Most of us who have been at this for a while have been unjustly treated or
unfairly criticized.
We need to remember that the
same thing happened to Paul and of course to our Lord Jesus and we must
continually strive to imitate them (1Co 11:1) walking in the steps our
Savior trod (1Pe 2:21-note),
so that we do not lose heart.
(See 1Pe 5:8-note
1Pe 5:9-note,
1Pe 5:10-note)
Earlier Paul had affirmed that he had
great
boldness
to speak forth the truth of the
Gospel (2Co 3:12-note)
and when he considered the greatness of his calling (having such a
hope),
it buoyed up his spirit and gave him courage to face all his adversaries and
afflictions with a sense of confidence. Beloved, as those who have been
called out of darkness into His marvelous light, we often lose heart when we
fail to remember the greatness of the hope (absolute assurance of future
good) our calling (Ep 1:18-note
Ep 4:4-note)
with which God has called us in and for Christ Jesus (Ro 1:6-note,
Jude 1:1) and we forget that we have the high privilege and purpose to
proclaim His excellencies to those still lost in darkness. (1Pe 2:9-note,
Acts 26:18)
Listen to Spurgeon's
exhortation...
The preacher should either speak in God’s
name or hold his tongue. My brother, if the Lord has not sent you with a
message, go to bed, or to school, or mind your farm; for what does it matter
what you have to say of your own? If heaven has given you a message, speak
it out as he ought to speak who is called to be the mouth of God. (cp Jer
20:9 Acts 4:19, 20)
Lose heart
(1573)
(ekkakeo
[word study]
from ek = out of or intensifies
meaning of... + kakos = bad) strictly speaking means to act or behave badly
in some circumstance. On one hand, it can mean to give in to evil. On the
other hand, it can convey the idea of to be weary in or become tired of
doing something, to lose courage, to slacken their one's labor or exertion
because of the weariness caused by prolonged effort. It can picture one who
becomes fainthearted or despondent in the face of trial or difficulty.
Ekkakeo - 6x in 6v - Lk 18:1;
2Co 4:1, 16; Ga 6:9-note;
Ep 3:13-note;
2Th 3:13. NAS = grow weary(1), lose heart(5).
It is worth noting that Paul begins
and ends this section with this same verb "lose heart" (ekkakeo)
emphasizing that despite the difficulties and detractions, he refused to
lose heart, and steadfastly remained "energized" for the ministry for which
he had been chosen (Ac 9:15, 16, cp 2Ti 1:1-note) ...
Therefore we do not lose heart, but
though our outer man is decaying, yet our inner man is being renewed day by
day. For momentary, light affliction is producing for us an eternal
weight of glory far beyond all comparison, while we look not at the
things which are seen (eg, the detractions and the detractors!), but at the things which are not seen
("20/20" eternal vision -
Father, grant this to all of Thy children in Christ. Amen); for the things
which are seen are temporal, but the things which are not seen are eternal.
(2Co 4:16-note,
2Co 4:17-note,
2Co 4:18-note)
Wood comments
that...
The verb enkakein means “to become good
for nothing,” “to grow faint,” and hence “to be discouraged”
(Gaebelein,
F, Editor: Expositor's Bible Commentary 6-Volume New Testament. Zondervan
Publishing or
computer version)
The UBS Handbook
notes that...
Not to be discouraged may be expressed in
a number of ways, often idiomatically, for example, “not to lose heart,”
“not to give up,” “not to run away,”
(Ed:
Have you ever felt like running away from the ministry for which He has
chosen you? Don't do it! Instead run to Him and hide in Him and in His
Sufficiency. Pr 30:5-note
Ps 32:7-note,
Ps 119:114-note,
Ps 143:9-note
Ps 9:9-note
Ps 27:5-note
Ps 31:20-note
Ps 91:1-note
Col 3:3-note) or “not to think that all is lost”
(The
United Bible Societies' New Testament Handbook Series
or
Logos)
MacArthur
writes that ekkakeo was...
A
strong Greek term which refers to abandoning oneself to cowardly surrender.
That was not how Paul responded to the continual attacks he faced.
(MacArthur,
J.: The MacArthur Study Bible Nashville: Word
or
Logos)
Rienecker
writes that ekkakeo
became a Christian technical term
expressing the unflagging pursuit of the goal of service to neighbor, or of
apostolic ministry, as well as the tautness (having no give or slack --
tightly drawn, chiefly a nautical term signifying in proper order or
condition) of the determined heart that does not let up or lose courage.
(Linguistic and Exegetical Key to the Greek New Testament)
Albert Barnes writes that ekkakeo...
means properly to turn out a coward; to lose one's courage; then to be
faint-hearted, to faint, to despond, in view of trial, difficulty, etc. Here
it means, that by the mercy of God he was not disheartened by the
difficulties which he met; his faith and zeal did not flag; he was enabled
to be faithful, and laborious, and his courage always kept up, and his mind
was filled with cheerfulness. See [2Co 2:14]. He was deterred by no
difficulties; embarrassed by no opposition; driven from his purpose by no
persecution; and his strength did not fail under any trims. The
consciousness of being entrusted with such a ministry animated him; and the
mercy and grace of God sustained him.
Constable comments that...
Since we have a ministry in which the Spirit opens people’s eyes and
transforms their characters we can feel encouraged. Our job is not simply to
lay God’s high standards on people, as Moses did, but to provide God’s grace
to them as the Holy Spirit’s agents.
Warren Wiersbe writes that...
A discouraged Methodist preacher wrote to the great Scottish preacher,
Alexander Whyte, to ask his counsel. Should he leave the ministry? “Never
think of giving up preaching!” Whyte wrote to him. “The angels around the
throne envy you your great work!” That was the kind of reply Paul would have
written, the kind of reply all of us need to ponder whenever we feel our
work is in vain.
><>><>><>
Unmistakable Success - What would you think of a baseball player who
played seven seasons without hitting the ball in fair territory? One of the
best players of all time, Mickey Mantle, did the equivalent of that. His
walks and strikeouts add up to more than 3,400 trips to the plate—seven
seasons’ worth.
Or what would you think of an inventor who failed hundreds of times in his
experiments? Thomas Edison, perhaps the greatest inventor in American
history, spent many long months failing before he found a filament that
would stay lit in his incandescent light.
The lesson behind these experiences is clear: We have to look beyond
failures and keep persevering.
I can’t think of a better example of someone who persevered despite apparent
failure than the apostle Paul. His list of failures would lead most of us to
quit. For one, the people in a church he founded in Corinth stumbled badly.
For another, he went to prison numerous times. Throw in the shipwrecks,
beatings, and betrayals (2Co 11:23, 24, 25, 26 27), and you could have a
picture of defeat. Yet Paul’s ministry is remembered for its unmistakable
success.
Let’s learn to look past our failures. Because of God’s mercy, we need
not lose heart (2Co 4:1). - May 20, 1996 — by Dave Branon
Success is failure turned inside out—
The silver tint of clouds of doubt,
So stick to the fight when you're hardest hit—
It's when things seem worst that you mustn't quit. —Piggott
Success often rises out of the ashes of failure.
><>><>><>
Are You Weary? - I read a story about a pastor of a small, rural
church in Scotland. He had been forced out by his elders, who claimed they
saw no fruit from his ministry. The village in which the pastor served was a
difficult place. People’s hearts were cold and hostile to the truth. During
the time the pastor served, there had been no conversions and no baptisms.
But he did recall one positive response to his preaching.
When the offering plate was passed during a service, a young boy placed the
plate on the floor, stood up, and stepped into it. When asked to explain, he
replied that he had been deeply touched by the minister’s life, and while he
had no money to give he wanted to give himself wholly to God.
The boy who stepped into the plate was Bobby Moffat, who in 1817 became a
pioneer missionary to South Africa. He was greatly used of God to touch many
lives. And it all started with that small church and the faithful work of
that unappreciated pastor.
Perhaps you see no fruit from your work for the Lord. Remain faithful! Do
not lose heart, but ask God to strengthen you with His power (2Corinthians
4:1,7). In His time and in His way, He will produce a harvest if you do not
give up (Galatians 6:9). September 15, 2003 — by David H. Roper
Keep me faithful, keep me grateful,
This my earnest plea each day!
Keep me serving, keep me telling
Of His love while yet I may!
—Thiesen
A fruitful harvest requires faithful service.
|
|
2
Corinthians 4:2 Commentary |
|
2 Corinthians 4:2 but
we have
renounced the
things
hidden because
of
shame, not
walking in
craftiness
or
adulterating
the
word of
God, but by the
manifestation
of
truth
commending
ourselves to
every
man's
conscience in
the
sight of
God.
(NASB:
Lockman) |
|
Greek:
alla
apeipametha
ta
krupta
tes
aischunes,
me
peripatountes
en
panourgia
mede
dolountes
ton
logon
tou
theou,
alla
te
phanerosei
tes
aletheias
sunistanontes
heautous
pros
pasan
suneidesin
anthropon
enopion
tou
theou.
Amplified: We have renounced disgraceful ways (secret thoughts,
feelings, desires and underhandedness, the methods and arts that men
hide through shame); we refuse to deal craftily (to practice trickery
and cunning) or to adulterate or handle dishonestly the Word of God,
but we state the truth openly (clearly and candidly). And so we
commend ourselves in the sight and presence of God to every man’s
conscience.
(Lockman)
Barclay: But we have refused to have anything to do with hidden
and shameful methods. We do not act with unscrupulous cleverness. We
do not adulterate the word which God gave us to preach. But by making
the truth clear, we commend ourselves to the human conscience in all
its forms in the sight of God.
(Westminster
Press)
God's Word: Instead, we have refused to use secret and
shameful ways. We don't use tricks, and we don't distort God's word.
As God watches, we clearly reveal the truth to everyone. This is our
<letter of> recommendation. (GWT)
Easy English: We do not do things in secret and evil ways.
We do not try to make people believe lies. We do not give a false
meaning to the word of God. The opposite is true. We tell the truth
clearly. We know that God sees everything. He sees everything that we
do. Therefore, we live in a way that is attractive to everyone’s
conscience.
ESV: But we have renounced disgraceful, underhanded ways. We
refuse to practice cunning or to tamper with God's word, but by the
open statement of the truth we would commend ourselves to everyone's
conscience in the sight of God. (ESV)
KJV: But have renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not
walking in craftiness, nor handling the word of God deceitfully; but
by manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to every man's
conscience in the sight of God.
NET: But we have rejected shameful hidden deeds, not behaving
with deceptiveness or distorting the word of God, but by open
proclamation of the truth we commend ourselves to everyone's
conscience before God. (NET
Bible)
NIV: Rather, we have renounced secret and shameful ways; we do
not use deception, nor do we distort the word of God. On the contrary,
by setting forth the truth plainly we commend ourselves to every man’s
conscience in the sight of God.
(NIV
- IBS)
NLT: We reject all shameful deeds and underhanded methods. We
don’t try to trick anyone or distort the word of God. We tell the
truth before God, and all who are honest know this. (NLT
- Tyndale House)
Phillips: We use no hocus-pocus, no clever tricks, no dishonest
manipulation of the Word of God. We speak the plain truth and so
commend ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God.
(Phillips:
Touchstone)
Weymouth: Nay, we have renounced the secrecy which marks a
feeling of shame. We practice no cunning tricks, nor do we adulterate
God’s Message. But by a full clear statement of the truth we strive
to commend ourselves in the presence of God to every human conscience.
Wuest: but we have renounced the hidden things of shame, not
ordering the manner of our lives in the sphere of craftiness, nor even
adulterating the word of God [by an admixture of error], but by means
of an open declaration of the truth commending ourselves to every
variety of the conscience of men in the sight of God. (Eerdmans)
Young's Literal: but did renounce for ourselves the hidden
things of shame, not walking in craftiness, nor deceitfully using the
word of God, but by the manifestation of the truth recommending
ourselves unto every conscience of men, before God; |
|
|
BUT WE HAVE RENOUNCED THE THINGS
HIDDEN BECAUSE OF SHAME, NOT WALKING IN CRAFTINESS OR ADULTERATING THE WORD
OF GOD: alla apeipametha (1PAMI) ta krupta tes
aischunes, me peripatountes (PAPMPN) en panourgia mede dolountes (PAPMPN)
ton logon tou theou: (renounced:
1Co 4:5) (shame, Ro 1:16 6:21 Eph 5:12) (not: 2Co 1:12 2:17
11:3,6,13-15 Eph 4:14 1Th 2:3-5) a
NO HOCUS POCUS
PERMITTED OR PRACTICED!
Phillips has a pithy summary of
the three ministerial perversions Paul staunchly disavows...
We use no hocus-pocus, no clever tricks,
no dishonest manipulation of the Word of God.
But (alla) uses this
conjunction to sound a strong
contrast
between God's ministry in and through
him and the false ministers that had infiltrated the church at Corinth.
Renounced (550) (apeipomen from
apó = from + eípon <> épo = speak) literally means
to speak off or to speak out (against). To refuse, deny, renounce, spurn, disown with aversion.
The
aorist tense
is a "timeless aorist" (A T
Robertson) which pictures this as a once and forever repudiation (Bengel).
Charles Hodge adds that what
Paul denies of himself he affirms of the false teachers, their "lack of
openness, adopting secret methods to achieve their ends, which they would be
ashamed to admit openly."
Renounce (English definitions)
to give up, refuse, or resign usually by formal declaration. To refuse to
follow, obey, or recognize any further. To disown; to disclaim; to reject;
as a title or claim; to refuse to own or acknowledge as belonging to as to
renounce a title to land or a claim to reward; to renounce all pretensions
to applause. To renounce allegiance. To cast off or reject as a possession;
to forsake.
David Lowery writes that...
Already he had adroitly parried the
attacks of his accusers several times in the letter (e.g., 2Co 1:17; 2:17;
3:1), but he felt forced to do so again (e.g., 2Co 6:3; 7:3; Chapters
10-13).
M J Harris adds that...
Evidently he had been accused of
deceitful behavior (cf. 2Co 7:2; 12:16). This he emphatically rejects. The
openness marking the new covenant had always been reflected in his conduct.
His tactics had never been secretive or deceptive, nor had he ever
dishonestly manipulated the message of God entrusted to him.
(Gaebelein,
F, Editor: Expositor's Bible Commentary 5-Volume New Testament. Zondervan
Publishing or
computer version)
Hidden (2927)(kruptos from
krupto = keep secret; English ~ cryptic, etc) means concealed, secret, hidden either to protect it or for
self-serving purposes. Krupto describes something that is unknown
because it is being kept secret or hidden.
Liddell-Scott give an example
of a secular use of kruptos -- "a trench covered and concealed by planks and
earth".
Giving and praying are to be done in
secret (Mt 6:4, Mt 6:6) for God sees all things and there is nothing hidden
from Him so that all things will one day be brought to the light by
Him (Mt 10:26 Mk 4:22 Lk 8:17 Lk 12:2 1Co 4:5). Kruptos conveys the
idea of privately in Jn 7:4, 10, 18:20. Kruptos describes the
"secrets" of men's hearts (Ro 2:16, 1Co 14:25). "The hidden person of
the heart" in 1Pe 3:4 which Wuest explains is "the personality of the
Christian woman as made beautiful by the ministry of the Holy Spirit in
glorifying the Lord Jesus and manifesting Him in and through her life."
Krupto - 17x in 15v in NAS
- Mt 6:4, 6; 10:26 Mk 4:22 Lk 8:17; 12:2 Jn 7:4, 10; 18:20 Ro 2:16, 29 1Co
4:5 14:25 2Co 4:2 1Pe 3:4. NAS = hidden(5), inwardly(1), secret(7),
secrets(2), things hidden(2).
Hidden because of shame -
Literally "the hidden things of shame" - Paul is referring to
those things that are done only under cover and with the fear of shame
if they were to be exposed.
The Amplified Version does an
excellent job of "amplifying the meaning...
We have renounced disgraceful ways (secret thoughts, feelings, desires
and underhandedness, the methods and arts that men hide through shame); we
refuse to deal craftily (to practice trickery and cunning) or to adulterate
or handle dishonestly the Word of God, but we state the truth openly
(clearly and candidly). And so we commend ourselves in the sight and
presence of God to every man’s conscience.
(Lockman)
Shame (152) (aischune from
aischos = shame, disfigurement, disgrace) means shame resulting
from exposure of sin for example. Paul is describing that which brings
humiliating disgrace or disrepute.
Aischune - 6x in 6v in NAS
- Luke 14:9; 2 Cor 4:2; Phil 3:19; Heb 12:2; Jude 1:13; Rev 3:18. NAS
= disgrace(1), shame(5).
Webster's 1828 on shame - A
painful sensation excited by a consciousness of guilt, or of having done
something which injures reputation; or by the exposure of that which nature
or modesty prompts us to conceal. Shame is particularly excited by the
disclosure of actions which, in the view of men, are mean and degrading.
Hence it is often or always manifested by a downcast look or by blushes,
called confusion of face.
UBS Handbook explains that...
The words “of shame” characterize those
things that are hidden; they are “secret and shameful deeds.” More
specifically, does Paul mean that the people who do such deeds are, in fact,
ashamed of
their deeds? (Revised English Bible “the deeds that people hide for very
shame.”) Or does he mean that they should be ashamed and are
not? Either is possible, but the majority opinion seems to be that the
practices were “so shameful that they have to be kept hidden” (Barclay).
(The
United Bible Societies' New Testament Handbook Series
or
Logos)
J H Bernard...
the hidden things of shame; cf. Ro 13:12,
Eph. 4:22. The stress is on ta krupta (the hidden); it is the openness and
candor of his ministry on which he insists (cf. John 3:20). (Expositor's
Greek Testament)
Henry Alford adds that the
meaning here is that...
The having any views, ends or practices
which, such as have them, hide through shame...Shame is subjective, meaning
fear arising from expectation of exposure. It is plain from the
context
that
it refers, not to crimes and unholy practices, but to crooked arts, of which
men are ashamed, and which perhaps were made use of by the false teachers (The
New Testament for English Readers).
Not walking in - Not living, not
behaving, not conducting oneself. The preposition "in" (en)
means in the sphere of (it's like a fish in a fish bowl - he lives
in the sphere of the water that fish bowl). Wuest translates it as Paul
saying we are "not ordering the manner of our lives in the sphere of
craftiness", as were the false teachers.
Walking
(4043)(peripateo
from peri = about,
around + pateo = walk, tread) means literally to walk around, to go
here and there in walking, to tread all around. The 39 uses in the Gospels
always refer to literal, physical walking. Seven of the 8 uses in Acts are
also in the literal sense (except Acts 21:21). (See
Spurgeon's comments on what it means to walk)
Paul uses peripateo only in the metaphorical sense (32 times in his
Epistles) meaning to conduct one's life, to order one's behavior, to
behave, to make one's way, to make due use of opportunities, to live or
pass one’s life (with a connotation of spending some time in a place).
UBS Handbook...
"To walk” is an Old Testament expression
that means “to conduct oneself” or “to behave in a certain manner.” (Ibid)
Craftiness (3834)(panourgia
from pas = all + ergon
= work) is literally "all working" or capable of all work. In the NT
panourgia
takes on a negative meaning and conveys the ideas of trickery involving evil
cunning, cleverness, craftiness, shrewdness, craft or treachery. A crafty
person is marked by subtlety and guile and is adept in the use of cunning.
Beware! (see Paul's warning to the Ephesian elders - Acts 20:28).
Paul is saying that he
scrupulously avoids clever manipulation of words so that error is made to look like truth (cp Ep 4:14-note).
He is well aware of the fact that there are those who do practice panourgia,
using subtle sophistries and specious statements because they are willing to
do anything to achieve their unscrupulousness goals (to them this "end
justifies the means" regardless of cunning the means are.)
Kent Hughes adds that
craftiness is...
a cunning readiness to adopt any device
or trickery for the achievement of ends which are anything but altruistic
(unselfish regard for or devotion to the welfare of others)...I once
received an expensive brochure that featured eight separate pictures of a
self-styled “evangelist” designed to instill confidence in his power. It
featured photos of him praying by a waterfall and praying with his hands on
a pile of letters asking for prayer. Another photo showed him holding a
baby. In another he was shaking the hand of a poor man. But what really got
my attention was the offer of a specially blessed handkerchief that had been
dipped in the Jordan River and that, if prayerfully applied, would bring
healing. The cost? About twenty-five dollars in today’s economy. Such
conduct was anathema to Paul.
(Hughes,
R. K. 2 Corinthians: Power in Weakness. Preaching the Word. Crossway
or
Logos
or
Wordsearch)
In 2Corinthians 11:3 Paul explains
that one of the sought after effects of panourgia is to deceive the
listener even as Satan deceived Eve (Ge 3:13)...
But I am afraid that, as the serpent
deceived (beguiled
her thoroughly, seduced her wholly, led her astray - see
exapatao)
Eve by his craftiness (panourgia), your minds will be led
astray from the simplicity and purity of devotion to Christ. (2Corinthians
11:3)
Satan's modus operandi has
not changed that much so we do well to remain on "high alert" (1Pe 5:8-note
cp 2Co 2:11 "we are not ignorant of his schemes") for his nefarious
schemes. As Moses declared "the serpent was (still is) more crafty than any
beast of the field which the LORD God had made" (Ge 3:1).
Barnes writes that...
Truth never needs such arts (panourgia); and no cause
will long succeed by mere trick and cunning.
NIDNTT has the
following note regarding the classic use of panourgia...
Its first appearance is in Aeschylus; and
from then on in secular Greek its connotation is most commonly pejorative,
an unprincipled “capable of doing anything” (e.g. Aristotle, Lysias). Even
as a divine attribute (in Euripides, Artemis applies it to Aphrodite) the
connotation is negative. In the few instances where the word bears a
positive sense, there is a hint of presumption or perhaps deceptive
evaluation (Plato, Plutarch). It is possible that the positive ability
implicit in the etymology of the word group never got off the ground because
in Gk. thought the very idea of such ability is indicative of an arrogance
which soon tinges the panourgia with undesirable characteristics. (Brown,
Colin, Editor. New International Dictionary of NT Theology. 1986. Zondervan)
Here are the other 3 NT (out of 5) uses of panourgia...
Lk 20:23 But He (Jesus) detected their
trickery and said to them, (The scribes and the chief priests are guilty
of “trickery” in their question to Jesus)
1Co 3:19 For the wisdom of this world is
foolishness before God. For it is written, "He is the one who catches the
wise in their craftiness";
Ep 4:14-note
As a result, we are no longer to be children, tossed here and there by waves
and carried about by every wind of doctrine (Thus the vital importance of
the ministry described in Ep 4:11-note
- if we are preaching and teaching with stories and humor rather than the
Word of Truth, we are failing to arm the disciples to be able to discern
Satan's subtle errors and lies. Remember that Satan wages war in the mind
and the battle is for truth! Preach the Word! 2Ti 4:2-note),
by the
trickery of
men, by craftiness (panourgia) in deceitful scheming;
A W Pink comments...
The ministers of the New Covenant are
described as those who had "renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not
walking in craftiness." Christendom today is infested with men who are full
of deceit and hypocrisy, trimming their sails according to whatever
direction the breeze of public opinion is blowing. "Nor handling the Word of
God deceitfully" (2Corinthians 4:2). The true servant of Christ holds back
nothing that is profitable, no matter how unpalatable it may be unto his
hearers. He is one who does not magnify himself, nor his denomination—but
Christ—His wondrous Person, His atoning blood, His exacting claims. (Ministerial
Thieves)
NO ADDITIVES OR
ADULTERANTS
Adulterating (1389) (doloo from
dolos
which is derived from delo
meaning to bait or to catch with bait) is used
only here in the NT and means to use deceit, to bait, to ensnare, to corrupt with
error, to distort, to falsify. The idea is changing something to cause it be
be false (even while it appears to be "true"!). The goal is to beguile, to
ensnare or to take by craft. It's like adding a touch of arsenic to pure,
life giving water - now it is deadly poison!
The
present tense
pictures this falsification
as an ongoing process, an apt description of false teachers, for even when
they present the truth as Peter writes the "secretly introduce
destructive heresies" (2Pe 2:1-note),
where the verb pareisago (see
word study) accurately
describes their method of bringing in deadly error alongside the truth. This
always reminds of the U S Treasury department's method of training their
agents to recognize counterfeit $20 bills by having them intensely study
real $20 bills.
Paul passed on the
unadulterated Word of God to the saints, writing in his first
epistle...
For I received from the Lord that which
I also delivered to you (1Co 11:23a)
Comment: What Paul heard, Paul
preached, in purity and in power! How can we who preach and teach do any
less in a day when God and His Word and prayer to Him are being
systematically extracted from the heart of "In God we trust" America
which is reaping the consequences of this evil seed in the form of a rapidly
crumbling social fabric much like the days of the Judges (Jdg 21:25-note).
We must become like the psalmist and cry out "My soul cleaves to the
dust. Revive me according to Thy Word." (Ps 119:25-note)
Doloo was used in secular Greek
to describe the dishonest practice of adulterating wine with water. Here Paul is saying in essence "I don't
water down the Word of Truth with half truths, funny stories, inappropriate
language (which is sadly becoming all to accepted in modern, "hip",
"authentic" evangelicalism!)!"
It is worth noting that the root word
dolos literally refers to a fishhook, trap, or trick -- all of which
are various "instruments" of deception. Dolos is a deliberate attempt
to mislead, trick, snare or "bait" (baiting the trap in attempt to "catch"
the unwary victim), in this case the bait being lies that are spoken that
are counter to the Word of Truth (cp Jn 8:44, 2Co 11:13 14 15 2Pe 2:1-note
2Pe 2:2, 3-note).
Dolos reflects a desire to gain advantage or preserve one's position
by deceiving others. A modern term in advertising is called "bait and
switch" where the unwary consumer is lured in by what looks like an
price too good to be true!
William Barclay explains
that...
We best get the meaning of this from the
corresponding verb (doloun). Doloun has two characteristic usages. It
is used of debasing precious metals and of adulterating wines. Dolos
is deceit; it describes the quality of the man who has a tortuous and a
twisted mind, who cannot act in a straightforward way, who stoops to devious
and underhand methods to get his own way, who never does anything except
with some kind of ulterior motive. It describes the crafty cunning of the
plotting intriguer who is found in every community and every society." In
another writing Barclay explains that dolos can be translated "guile" and
that "It comes from a word which means bait; it is used for trickery
and deceit. It is used for instance of a mousetrap. When the Greeks
were besieging Troy and could not gain entry, they sent the Trojans the
present of a great wooden horse, as if it was a token of good will. The
Trojans opened their gates and took it in. But the horse was filled with
Greeks who in the night broke out and dealt death and devastation to Troy.
That exactly is dolos. It is crafty, cunning, deceitful, clever
treachery. Dolos is the trickery of the man who is out to deceive
others to attain his own ends, the vice of the man whose motives are never
pure. (Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press)
Paul says I do not corrupt, debase, or
make impure the precious (Ps 19:10-note,
Ps 119:72-note,
Ps 119:127-note,
Job 23:12-note),
persisting (Eternal - Mt 24:35 5:18-note),
powerful (Lk 1:37ASV) Word of God by adding any genre of
foreign or inferior elements!
Dear preacher of the Word may I ask you
a question? How much time do you devote to introducing your message each
Sunday, before you begin to preach the Word? I routinely encounter sermons
where from one quarter to one third of the "sermon" time is allocated to
introductory illustrations calculated to make the Word more "authentic".
Beloved, that is too long. The Word is authentic. I am not against salient,
short introductions and illustrations, but when they begin to "cut in" on
the time of the pure milk of God's Word then frankly the saints are being
short changed and will likely walk away unsatisfied for only the Word brings
genuine soul satisfaction. Personal stories and cute illustrations may
generate an emotional response, but ultimately they only tickle the ears
(2Ti 4:3,4-note) and
produce "spiritual children" who are vulnerable to being tossed to and fro by every wind of
doctrine (Ep 4:14-note). God's Words through His prophet Jeremiah are relevant
to much of the fare being offered from modern pulpits...
Thus says the LORD, "Stand by the ways
and
see and
ask
(=
3 commands) for the ancient paths
(cp Dt 32:7) where the
good way is, and walk in it and you shall find rest for your souls.
But they said, 'We will not walk in it.' (Jer 6:16)
For My people have committed two evils:
They have forsaken Me (Je 18:15), the Fountain of living waters, to hew for themselves
cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water. (Jer 2:13)
Guzik comments that...
Many preachers fail on this exact point.
They have the true gospel, but they add to it things of human
ingenuity and wisdom. Often, they add these corrupting or diluting
things to the gospel because they think it will make the gospel more
effective or give it a greater hearing. They are doing what Paul insisted he
would never do -- handling the word of God deceitfully. (2 Corinthians 4 Commentary)
C H
Spurgeon addressed the age old
tendency of preachers to change the words of the clear Gospel message in
order to make it more "seeker friendly" or hip or acceptable ("culturally
relevant") writing that...
Certain divines tell us that they must
adapt truth to the advance of the age, which means that they must murder it
and fling its dead body to the dogs...which simply means that a popular lie
shall take the place of an offensive truth.
John Calvin is quite blunt
writing...
For just as chaste and honorable women
are content with the gracefulness of natural beauty and do not resort to
artificial adornments, whereas harlots never think themselves well adorned
until they have corrupted nature, so too Paul’s boast is that he has set
forth the pure Gospel whereas others have offered a counterfeit Gospel
decked out with unworthy additions.
Earlier Paul had written...
we are not like many, peddling
(profiteering, adulterating for personal gain) the word of God, but
as from sincerity, but as from God, we speak in Christ in the sight of God.
(2Co 2:17)
HOW TO TAMPER WITH
THE WORD OF GOD!
Kent Hughes has some sobering
thoughts on how even evangelical preachers "tamper with the Word of God"
noting than instead of actually cutting out the Bible as crass liberal
preachers are prone to do...
it is far more common for the evangelical
preacher to "edit" (Ed: Edit = to alter, adapt, or
refine especially to bring about conformity to a standard or to suit a
particular purpose!) God’s Word:
(1) by removing the text from its
context,
(Ed: Context must be "king" in order to arrive at accurate
Interpretation - see example
of
danger of misinterpretation) and using it to say whatever the preacher likes (Ed: See example of
the mishandling Pr 29:18-discussion),
(2) by moralizing the text, so that it is reduced to an ethical maxim
that fits any religion,
(3) by using the text to promote hobbyhorses
(Ed: a topic to which one constantly reverts, a favorite object of
pursuit), and
(4) by dogmatic insistence that the text says things it
does not truly say. This homiletical hocus-pocus has subtle roots such as
the desire to be clever and popular or synthetically relevant
or intellectually respectable or to make the gospel more
acceptable.
But most often God’s Word
gets watered down by the
preacher’s laziness.
He simply will not do the hard work to engage and
preach a text in its
context.
(Hughes,
R. K. 2 Corinthians: Power in Weakness. Preaching the Word. Crossway
or
Logos
or
Wordsearch)
(Bolding and italics added)
Comment:
How many hours [or perhaps minutes!]
does it take for you to prepare your message for Sunday?
You are under grace, not legalism and so
there is no gold standard given in Scripture, but I have heard that Dr John
MacArthur routinely sets aside 20+ hours to prepare his messages. And we can
certainly see the fruit of his bountiful sowing! (Remember 2Co 5:9-note,
2Co 5:10-note)
John MacArthur emphasizes how
important it is that pastors and bible teachers constantly strive to
derive...
the right message from the right passage.
Don’t “proof text” your bias or opinions by making the Bible say what you
already know you want it to say...like the guy who said, “I’ve already
got a sermon; I just have to find a verse for it.” That’s having a
preconceived idea and then getting some verses to support it....so there are
three errors to avoid...
Don’t make a point at the price of a
proper interpretation
Avoid a superficial interpretation
Don’t spiritualize.
Warren Wiersbe cautions all of us
who handle the Word Truth to strive to rightly divide it (2Ti 2:15-note) ...
We must never divorce one part of
Scripture from another, but we must always “compare spiritual things with
spiritual” (1Co 2:13). We can prove almost anything by the Bible if we
isolate texts from the contexts and turn them into pretexts...
You can prove anything by the Bible,
provided you twist the Scriptures out of context and reject the
witness of your own conscience. The Bible is a book of literature and it
must be interpreted according to the fundamental rules of interpretation. If
people treated other books the way they treat the Bible, they would never
learn anything....
Most heresies are the perversion of some
fundamental doctrine of the Bible. False teachers take verses out of
context, twist the Scriptures, and manufacture doctrines that are
contrary to the Word of God. (Wiersbe,
W: Bible Exposition Commentary. 1989. Victor
or
Logos)
The Word of God - This phrase
occurs 47x in 46v in the NAS - 1 Sam 9:27; 2 Sam 16:23; 1 Kgs 12:22; 1 Chr
17:3; Pr 30:5; Mt 15:6; Mark 7:13; Luke 3:2; 5:1; 8:11, 21; 11:28; John
10:35; Acts 4:31; 6:2, 7; 8:14; 11:1; 13:5, 7, 46; 17:13; 18:11; Rom 9:6; 1
Cor 14:36; 2 Cor 2:17; 4:2; Eph 6:17; Phil 1:14; Col 1:25; 1 Thess 2:13; 1
Tim 4:5; 2 Tim 2:9; Titus 2:5; Heb 4:12; 6:5; 11:3; 13:7; 1 Pet 1:23; 2 Pet
3:5; 1 John 2:14; Rev 1:2, 9; 6:9; 19:13; 20:4
Related Resources:
Click Scriptural Descriptions
of the Word of God
Inductive Study on the
Power of the Word of God
Word
(3056)
(logos
from
légō = to speak with words; English = logic, logical) means
something said and describes a communication whereby the mind finds
expression in words. The Words of the Bible express the mind of God.
Paul gives us a wonderful "definition" of the unadulterated
Word and its work (efficacy) in men...
And for this reason we also
constantly thank God that when you received from us the word of God's
message, you
accepted it not as the
word of men, but for what it really is, the word of God, which also (present
tense =
continually) performs its work (energeo
- energetic, efficient, effectual, efficacious!) in you who believe.
(1Th 2:13- note)
THE POWER OF THE WORD - The
renowned preacher C H Spurgeon once tested an auditorium in which he was to
speak that evening. Stepping into the pulpit, he loudly proclaimed, "Behold
the lamb of God Who takes away the sin of the world." (Jn 1:29)
Satisfied with the acoustics, he left and went his way. Unknown to him,
there were two men working in the rafters of that large auditorium, neither
one Christians. One of the men was pricked in his conscience by the verse
Spurgeon quoted and became a believer later that day! Such is the
penetrating power of God's eternal word! Little wonder that Paul is so
insistent on our "preaching of the Word" (2Ti 4:2-note)!
BUT BY THE MANIFESTATION OF TRUTH
COMMENDING OURSELVES TO EVERY MAN'S CONSCIENCE IN THE SIGHT OF GOD: alla te phanerosei tes aletheias sunistanontes (PAPMPN)
heautous pros pasan suneidesin anthropon enopion tou theou: (by: 2Co 5:11 6:4-7 7:14)
But (alla) draws a
marked
contrast
between the trickery and deceit of the false teachers and
his open presentation of the Word of Truth. This is a good reminder to all
of us that the best "antidote" for false teaching is the Word of Truth.
Remember that spiritual warfare is not so much a "power" struggle as
it is a truth struggle.
By the manifestation of (the)
truth - ("by plain statement of the truths of the Gospel in public
preaching" [Bernard]) By simple exhibition of the truth, stating it as it is,
without "additives" (as with philosophies, traditions, etc, cp Col 2:8, 9-note),
not taking a text out of its
context, etc
In the first letter to the Corinthians
Paul emphasized his approach to ministry writing that...
when I came to you, brethren, I did not
come with superiority of speech or of wisdom, proclaiming to you the
testimony of God. For I determined to know nothing among you except
Jesus Christ, and Him crucified. (1 Co 2:1, 2).
Manifestation (5321)
(phanerosis from phaneroo = to make manifest) means a bringing
to light or to full disclosure. ("the full light of truth")
Phanerosis describes the full
exhibition of any thing by clear evidence, disclosing what is otherwise
unseen or obscure. Here it describes Paul's open proclamation of the Word of
Truth which stands in marked contrast to the shameful practices that must be
hidden.
The only other NT use of this noun is 1Cor 12:7 describing spiritual
gifts as "the manifestation of the Spirit".
Barnes adds...
not by blunting its edge, or concealing
anything, or explaining it away; but by an open, plain, straight-forward
exhibition of it as it is in Jesus. Preaching should consist in a simple
exhibition of the truth. There is no deceit in the gospel itself; and there
should be none in the manner of exhibiting it. It should consist of a simple
statement of things as they are. The whole design of preaching is to make
known the truth. And this is done in an effectual manner only when it is
simple, open, undisguised, without craft, and without deceit.
Truth
(225)(aletheia
from a = indicates
following word has the opposite meaning ~ without + lanthano = to be
hidden or concealed, to escape notice) has the literal sense of that which
contains nothing hidden, that which is not concealed so that it can be seen
or expressed for what it really is. The basic understanding of aletheia
is that it is the manifestation of a hidden reality. For example,
when you are a witness in a trial, the court attendant says "Raise your
right hand. Do you swear that you will tell the truth and nothing but the
truth so help you God?" And you say, "I do" and you sit down. The
question the court attendant is asking is "Are you willing to come into
this courtroom and manifest something that is
hidden
to us that only you know so that you will bear evidence to that?"
Therefore when you speak the truth, you are manifesting a hidden
reality. Does that make sense? An parallel example in Scripture is the
case of the woman in the crowd who had touched Jesus (Read context = Mk
5:24-25, 26-27, 28-29, 30, 31-32), but when she became "aware of what had
happened to her, came and fell down before Him, and told Him the whole
truth" (Mk 5:33) and nothing but the truth. She did not lie. She
spoke no falsehoods.
Noah Webster defined truth
as
Conformity to fact or reality; exact
accordance with that which is, or has been, or shall be. (1828 Dictionary)
Truth then is the
correspondence between a reality and a declaration which professes to
set forth or describe that reality. To say it another way, words
spoken or written are true when they correspond with objective reality.
Persons and things are true when they correspond with their profession
(which we describe with words like integrity, sincerity, non-hypocritical,
etc). In other words, "what you see is what you get". Hence God's Word of
Truth is His declaration which corresponds to reality in the
visible and invisible world and for time and eternity. God’s Word of
Truth is the source and measure not only of all spiritual and moral
truth but of all truth of any sort on which it speaks.
Charles Spurgeon wisely said
that
The spotless purity of truth must always
be at war with the blackness of heresy and lies
><>><>><>
The Heart Of The Gospel - When E. Stanley Jones, well-known
missionary to India, had the opportunity to meet with Mahatma Gandhi, he
asked a searching question of India’s revered leader: “How can Christianity
make a stronger impact on your country?” Gandhi very thoughtfully replied
that three things would be required.
First, Christians must begin to live more like Jesus. Second,
the Christian faith should be presented without any adulteration. Third,
Christians should emphasize love, which is at the heart of the gospel. (Ed:
Gandhi would have liked to meet Paul who lived in a way that was open and
attractive to every man’s conscience.)
These insightful suggestions are the key to effective evangelism around the
world. As messengers of God’s love, we are to be human mirrors who reflect
without distortion a growing likeness to our Lord; we are not to walk in
“craftiness” (2Co 4:2). If our lives reflect an image that is spiritually
blurred, the truth of saving grace may not be clearly communicated (2Co 4:3,
4, 5). We are also to share the biblical essentials of our faith clearly. We
must not handle the Word of God “deceitfully” (2Co 4:2). And our lives are
to be marked by love for God and others (1Jn 5:1, 2).
Let’s be sure that we reflect a clear image of Jesus’ likeness, the truth of
God, and love. — by Vernon C. Grounds
Called to be salt and light in this world,
Called to preserve and to shine,
Called to reflect the glory of God—
Oh, what a calling is mine!
—Fitzhugh
The primary reason for living in this world
is to reflect the likeness of Christ to the world.
><>><>><>
Truth is like a "bluegill"
fish in the "war of truth" incessantly being waged against God and His
children by the
the
world,
the
flesh
and the
devil...
San Francisco and New York City are using
bluegill fish to check for the presence of toxins in their water
supply, which could be a possible target for a terrorist attack. A small
number of bluegills are kept in a tank at the bottom of some water treatment
plants because the fish are sensitive to chemical imbalances in their
environment. When a disturbance is present in the water, the bluegills react
against it.
Like these bluegills, Paul wanted the Galatians to beware of and react
against any toxic disturbance in the “true gospel” that was being preached.
The toxin was defined as the false principle that God grants acceptance to
people and considers them righteous on the basis of their obedience to a set
of rules (especially circumcision and dietary laws). In short, obedience to
the law was needed, apart from faith in Jesus. This false teaching was a
toxic disturbance of the truth and the Galatians were told to react
strongly against it. Paul said that anyone preaching a gospel that is not
based on grace through faith in Christ alone should be accursed (Gal. 1:8,
9).
Let’s faithfully study the Scriptures so we can detect the toxins of false
teaching and proclaim the truth of God’s wonderful salvation through faith
in Jesus.
(Our
Daily Bread, Copyright RBC Ministries, Grand Rapids, MI. Reprinted by
permission. All rights reserved)
Lord, teach us from
Your holy Word
All error to discern,
And by Your Spirit’s light help us
From Satan’s snares to turn.
—Bosch
If you know the
truth,
you can discern what’s false.
><>><>><>
Commend ourselves - Note Paul's use of the plural - not "myself"
but "ourselves". Again he goes to great lengths to minimize any
accusation of self adulation.
Commend (4921)(sunistemi/sunistao
from
sun/syn = together with + hístemi
= set, place, stand) means literally to set, place or put together. To
bring together. When one brings together someone with another person, the
idea of this verb is that it is a way of presenting or introducing them and
this gives way to the meaning of commend, which means to recommend as
worthy of notice, regard, kindness or confidence. When we commend someone we
speak in favor of them, present them as worthy or recommend them.
The
present tense
indicates this is Paul's continual practice to present himself to men as an
"open book". He has nothing to hide as do
the false teachers.
It is notable that more than 50% of the uses of sunistemi occur in
2Corinthians - 2Co 3:1 4:2 5:12 6:4 7:11 10:12,18 12:11.
Barnes comments on commending ourselves to every man's
conscience...
so speaking the
truth that every man's conscience shall approve it as true; every man shall
see it to be true, and to be in accordance with what he knows to be right.
Conscience is that faculty of the mind which distinguishes between right and
wrong, and which prompts us to choose the former and avoid the latter, Jn
8:9.
Conscience (4893)
(suneidesis
is derived from
sun/syn = with
+ eido = know) literally means a "knowing with", a co-knowledge with
oneself or a being of one's own witness in the sense that one's own
conscience "takes the stand" as the chief witness, testifying either to
one's innocence or guilt. Suneidesis
describes the process of thought which distinguishes what it considers
morally good or bad, commending the good, condemning the bad.
In this verse Paul presents himself to every man's
conscience as one who has openly and
accurately handled the Word of Truth.
Suneidesis - Used 8x in the first letter to the Corinthians 1Co
8:7, 10, 12; 10:25, 27 28 29 (twice) and 3x in 2Co 1:12; 4:2; 5:11
Webster's 1828 Dictionary says conscience is
Internal or
self-knowledge, or judgment of right and wrong; or the faculty, power or
principle within us, which decides on the lawfulness or unlawfulness of our
own actions and affections, and instantly approves or condemns them.
The conscience of men who saw and heard Paul's
ministry made an internal judgment of whether it was good or bad. Paul
had no fear that he would be accused of any of the aspects he has just
renounced, for he "knew that both his ministry and his message found
approval in the conscience of every man, even if they would not admit
it." (Guzik)
John MacArthur adds that...
All people,
even those who have not heard the gospel, have an innate (though limited)
knowledge of God’s law. The preaching of the gospel activates the
conscience, which bears witness to the truth of the message even in those
who reject it.
(MacArthur,
J: 2Corinthians. Chicago: Moody Press
or
Logos
or
Wordsearch)
UBS Handbook adds that...
Normally in the
New Testament the word conscience refers to one’s ability to know
that one has done something wrong. Here and in 2Co 5.11 conscience is
used of one’s ability to decide on the rightness or wrongness of someone
else’s behavior. (Ibid)
The Disciples Study Bible writes that...
The authority
of any leader in the church derives from the leader's own devotion to live
out God's Word. Leaders must plainly teach God's truth rather than human
theories. Teaching must be backed by noble character. Christ gave us the
example to follow (Jn 13:1-17).
First, the leader must know the
Word.
Second, the leader must apply it to my own life.
Third, the leader must diligently study it in order to teach it.
Fourth, the leader must teach it correctly so that others will
understand it.
(cp Ezra 7:10-note)
PAUL'S
MINISTRY IS
"CORAM DEO"
In the sight of (enopion from en =
in + ops = face, eye, countenance) vividly pictures one in the face of God
and so in front of Him as if in His presence. Coram Deo - before the
face of God (See Dr R C Sproul's answer to
What Does Coram Deo Mean?).
Paul's Coram Deo mindset reminds me of
Peter's exhortation to us as believers that..
if you address
as Father the One who impartially judges according to each man's work,
conduct
(aorist
imperative
= Command to do this effectively. Don't delay. It is important, even urgent)
yourselves in fear (reverential awe, shrinking from anything that might
grieve your Father) during the time of your stay upon earth (Which in the
perspective of eternity is barely a "blip on the screen" so to speak
but it yields profit [1Ti 4:7, 8-note]
or loss [1Co 3:12, 13, 14, 15] for every believer throughout eternity.
May God teach us how to number our days wisely
[Ps 90:12-note,
cp Ep 5:16-note]
and give us the strength to conduct ourselves circumspectly in Christ.
Amen)
(1Pe 1:17-note)
Paul's ministry is "clear and clean" not only
before the saints at Corinth but before the
Omniscient
God of the universe, an "Audience of One"! God is
the "Onlooker". The One Who discerns, searches and tests our heart ( Study
- 1Sa 16:7 Jer 17:10 1Ki 8:39 1Chr 28:9 Ps 7:9 44:21 139:23,24 Pr 17:3
Jer 11:20 20:12 Ro 8:27 Rev 2:23).
Hughes writes
that...
There is a higher scrutiny than that of
the human conscience: it is to God that every minister of the gospel
is ultimately and eternally answerable.
Paul's adversaries and critics could hardly have accused
him of arrogant self-commendation for not only was his ministry an "open
book" to the consciences of all men, but more important he constantly
conducted himself with a strong sense that God was continually watching his
ministry (cp Paul's statement "I [continually] serve
[God] with a clear conscience" - 2Ti 1:3- note).
Guzik adds
that...
Paul will, later in this chapter, reflect
again on his sufferings. In these first two verses, he has made it clear
that he has not suffered because he has been an unfaithful minister of the
gospel. It would have been easy for Paul’s enemies to claim, “He suffers so
much because God is punishing him because he is unfaithful.” That wasn’t the
case at all. (2 Corinthians 4 Commentary)
In his first letter to the Corinthians Paul
alluded to his continual "Coram Deo" mindset writing that...
to me it is a
very small thing that I may be
examined
(Make careful, exact research as in legal processes)
by you, or by any human court; in fact, I do not even
examine myself. For I
am conscious of nothing against myself (I have a clear conscience), yet I
am not by this acquitted (Why? Because he was fully aware that it was God
Who stood as final Judge - eg, even examining and disclosing our
motives! 1Co 4:5); but the one who
examines
me is the Lord. (1Co 4:3, 4)
Barnes...
As in the
immediate presence of God. We act as if we felt that his eye was upon us;
and this consideration serves to keep us from the hidden things of
dishonesty, and from improper arts in spreading the true religion. See [2Co
2:17].
Paul has a similar statement in the next
chapter...
Therefore (in
light of the truth of 2Co 5:10- note),
knowing the fear of the Lord (not a shaking fear but a worshipful reverence
for God, cp Pr 9:10, Ac 9:31), we persuade men (In context Paul is not
persuading men regarding salvation, but about his integrity in ministry),
but we are made manifest to God (cp
Coram Deo - Do you carry out your
ministry as it it were Coram Deo? It is!)
and I hope that we are made manifest also in your consciences. (2Co 5:11)
><>><>><>
Speaking For God - Despite my best efforts to write clearly,
sometimes I’m misunderstood. I feel bad about my failure and try to improve
my skills. Occasionally, however, readers take words out of context or read
into them something that bears no resemblance to the intended meaning. This
is frustrating because there’s no way to control how people use words once
they are published.
This brings to mind a much more serious offense—that of misusing the words
of the Lord. The prophets in Jeremiah’s day did this. They put their own
words into God’s mouth by claiming He said things they wanted to be true but
that God had never said. So the Lord told His people, “Do not listen to the
words of the prophets who prophesy to you. . . . They speak a vision of
their own heart, not from the mouth of the Lord” (Je. 23:16). Then the Lord
warned the people that He would forsake those who pervert His words and cast
them from His presence (Jer 23:36,39).
In contrast, the apostle Paul made a point of saying that he did not
handle the Word of God deceitfully (2Co 4:2). He knew the danger of
preaching his own ideas rather than God’s.
All of us need to be careful to use God’s Word for His purpose, rather than
for our own agenda. October 16, 2010 — by Julie Ackerman Link
Lord, keep us faithful to Your Word,
Although, at times, we might rephrase;
And help us never twist its truths
To justify our selfish ways.
—Sper
We must align ourselves with the Bible
and never try to align the Bible to ourselves.
|
|