|















Search chap/verse
Search word: Retrieve verses, illustrations, etc |

| |
GOTO JOHN PART
5
GOTO JOHN PART
7
|
COLLECTIONS
Commentaries, Word
Studies, Devotionals, Sermons, Illustrations
Old and New Testament. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
GOSPEL OF
JOHN
THE LIFE AND LIGHT OF MEN
LOVE TO THE UTTERMOST
F. B. Meyer |
|
PART 1
John 1:1 The Word
John 1:2-3 The Word in Creation
John 1:9 The Word as Light
John 1:14 The Word Made Flesh
John 1:18 The Word Declaring the Unseen
God
John 1:23, 29, 37 Three Memorable Days
John 1:51 The Son of Man
John 2:11 The First Miracle
John 2:21 The Temple of the Body
John 3:6 A Psalm of Life
PART 2
John 3:14 The Shadow of the Cross
John 3:34 Sent
John 4:14 Life as a Fountain
John 4:50 Daring to Acts in Faith
John 5:17 The Divine Master Workman
John 5:30 The Will of God
John 5:43 The Father's Name
John 6:37 The Father's Gift to the Son
John 6:57 The Bread Which Gives and
Sustains Life
John 6:68 The Words of Jesus
John 7:37-39 Rivers of Living Water
PART 3
John 8:11 The Penitent's Gospel
John 8:12 The Light of Life
John 8:28 Christ's Absorption in His
Father
John 8:31, 32, 36 Made Free by the Son
of God
John 8:50 The Glory of Christ
John 9:4 The Works of God
John 10:4 The Blessed Life of Trust
John 10:11 The Ideal Shepherd
John 10:40-42 The Works of an Ungifted
Worker
John 11:6 Love's Delays
John 12:3 Anointed for His Burial
John 12:24 Falling Into the Ground to
Die
PART 4
John 12:27 The Troubled Saviour
John 12:31 The World and Its Prince
John 12:35-36 The True Light of God's
Children
John 13:5 The Laver in the Life of
Jesus
|
John 13:36 Heaven Delayed but
Guaranteed
John 14:2 Many Mansions
John 14:6 Reality of Which Jacob's
Dream Was...Shadow
John 14:8-9 Christ Revealing the Father
John14:12 The Great Deeds of Faith
John 14:16 How to Secure More and
Better Prayer
John 14:16 The Other Paraclete
John 14:17 The Three Dispensations
PART 5
John 14:18-19 Three Paradoxes
John 14:23 Many Mansions for God
John 14:27 Christ's Legacy and Gift of
Peace
John 15:1 The Story of the Vine
John 15:4 Abide in Me and I in You
John 15:7 Prayer that Prevails
John 16:2-3 The Hatred of the World
John 16:8 The Work of the Holy Spirit
on the World
John 16:12-15 Christ's Reticence...the
Spirit's Advent
PART 6
John 16:33 The Conqueror of the World
John 17:19 Consecrated to Consecrate
John 17:21-23 The Lord's Prayer for His
People's Oneness
John 18:4 The Love that Bound Christ to
the Cross
John 18:1-14 Drinking the Cup
John 18:13 The Hall of Annas
John 18:16 How it Fared with Peter
John 18:24 The Trial Before Caiaphas
John 18:2 Judas, Which Betrayed Him
John 18:28 The First Trial Before
Pilate
John 18:39 The Second Trial Before
Pilate
PART 7
John 19:16 The Seven Sayings of the
Cross
John 19:40 Christ's Burial
John 20:1 The Day of Resurrection
John 21:1 The Lake of Galilee
John 21:15 Peter's Love and Work
John 21:22 The Life-Plan of Peter and
John
John 21:25 Back to the Father
|
|
1 THE
CONQUEROR OF THE WORLD
"In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have
overcome the world."--John 16:33.
IT WAS the road between Jerusalem and the Gate of the Garden. Behind, lay
the city bathed in slumber; before, the Mount of Olives with its terraced
gardens; above, the Passover moon, pouring down floods of silver light
that dropped to the ground through the waving branches of the trees. The
Lord was on his way to betrayal and death, along that path flecked by
chequered moonlight.
The farewell talk had been prolonged until the disciples had grasped
something of the Master's meaning. With many a comforting assurance it had
borne them forward to the magnificent but simple declaration, "I came
forth from the Father, and am come into the world; again, I leave the
world, and go to the Father" (John 16:28). At that announcement light
seems to have broken in upon their hearts, and they said unto Him, "Lo,
now speakest Thou plainly:.., by this we believe that Thou camest forth
from God." Jesus replied--not as translators render it, "Do ye now
believe?" but as it should be rendered --"At last ye believe": and He
proceeded to formulate three paradoxes :
First, That within an hour or so He would be alone, yet not alone.
Secondly, That they would have tribulation, and yet be in peace. Thirdly,
That though He was going to his death, He was certainly a Conqueror, and
had overcome the world, whose princes were about to crucify Him.
The word overcome occurs but twice in the recorded sayings of our Lord; in
the present instance it made a lasting impression on the Apostle John, who
constantly makes use of it in his Epistles. We meet with it six times in
his First Epistle, and sixteen times in the Book of Revelation. Who can
forget the sevenfold promise spoken by the risen Lord to those who
overcome; or the sublime affirmation concerning the martyrs, that they
overcame by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony?
I. CHRIST AND HIS DISCIPLES
HAVE A COMMON FOE
"The world."
And what is the world? It is well to
take the inspired definition given in 1John 2:16. After enumerating her
three daughters--the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the
pride of life--the Apostle goes on to say: "All that is in the world, is
not of the Father," i.e. does not originate or proceed from Him, but has
its source in the world itself. We might reverse this proposition and say:
"All that does not emanate from the Father, which you cannot trace back to
his purpose in creation, is that mysterious indefinable influence or
spirit which makes the world." The world, in this sense, is not primarily
a thing, or a collection of people, but a spiritual influence poured out
into the very atmosphere of our lives.
The spirit of the world insinuates itself everywhere. It is what we call
society; the consensus of fashionable opinion; the spirit which finds its
satisfaction in the seen and transient; the ambition that is encircled by
the rim of an earthly horizon; the aims, plans, and activities, which are
comprehended, as the Preacher says, "under the sun." You meet it in the
school, where little children judge each other by their dress and the
number of horses their fathers keep; in the country town, where strict
lines are drawn between the professional or wholesale man and the
retailer; in gatherings of well-dressed people, stiff with decorum and the
punctilious observance of etiquette. The world has formulated its
Beatitudes, thus: "Blessed are the rich: for they shall inherit the
earth."
"Blessed are the light-hearted: for they shall have many friends."
"Blessed are the respectable: for they shall be respected."
"Blessed are they who are not troubled by a sensitive conscience: for they
shall succeed in life."
"Blessed are they who can indulge their appetites to the full: for they
shall be filled."
"Blessed are they who have no need to conciliate their rivals: for they
will be saved from anxiety."
"Blessed are they who have no poor relations: for they shall be delivered
from annoyance."
"Blessed are they of whom all men speak well."
The world's code says, "Do as others do; don't be singular; never offend
against good taste; have a tinge of religiousness, but remember that too
much is impracticable for daily life; whatever you do, don't be poor;
never yield an inch, unless you are going to make something by the
concession; take every advantage of bettering your position, it matters
not at what cost to others--they must look after themselves, as you to
yourself."
But it was reserved for John Bunyan to draw Madame Bubble's portrait:
"This woman is a witch. 'I am mistress of the world,' she says, 'and men
are made happy by me.' She wears a great purse at her side; and her hand
is often in her purse fingering her money. Yea, she has bought off many a
man from a pilgrim's life after he had fairly begun it. She is a bold and
impudent slut also, for she will talk to any man. If there be one cunning
to make money, she will speak well of him from house to house. None can
tell of the mischief she does. She makes variance betwixt rulers and
subjects, 'twixt parents and children, 'twixt a man and his wife, 'twixt
the flesh and the heart. 'Had she stood by all this while,' said Standfast,
whose eyes were still full of her, 'you could not have set Madame Bubble
more amply before me, nor have better described her features.' 'He that
drew her picture was a good limner,' said Mr. Honest, 'and he that so
wrote of her said true.' 'Oh,' said Standfast, 'what a mercy it is that I
did resist her! for to what might she not have drawn me!"
II. CHRIST AND HIS DISCIPLES
HAVE A COMMON CONFLICT.
It is inevitable that there should be collision, and therefore conflict,
and as a result tribulation. The world-spirit will not brook our
disagreement with its plans and aims; and therefore they who persist in
living godly lives in this present evil world must suffer persecution.
Conflict about the use of power and prerogative.
At his baptism our Lord was proclaimed
to be the Son of the Highest, and anointed with the Holy Ghost and with
power. Instantly the prince of this world came to Him with the suggestion
that He should use it for the purposes of his own comfort and display.
"Make these stones bread for thine hunger; cast Thyself down and attract
the attention of the crowds." Here were the lust of the flesh, and the
lust of the eyes. But our Lord refused to use for Himself the power which
was entrusted to Him for the benediction and help of men.
Conflict as to the way of helping and saving men.
The world's way was to leap into the
seat of power at any cost, and from the height of universal authority
administer the affairs of the world. But Christ knew better. He saw that
He must take the form of a servant, and humble Himself to the lowest. If
He would save men, He cannot save Himself: if He would bring forth much
fruit, He must fall into the ground to die: if He would ascend far above
all heavens, bearing us with Him to the realms of eternal day, He must
descend first into the lower parts of the earth.
Conflict in the estimate of poverty and suffering.
The world looked on these as the most
terrible disasters that could befall. Christ, on the other hand, taught
that blessedness lay most within reach of the poor in spirit, the
mourners, the merciful, the forgiving, and the persecuted. But the
Pharisees, who were lovers of money, when they heard all these things,
scoffed at Him.
Conflict in their diverse notions of royalty.
The Jews looked for a Messiah who
should revive the glories of the days of David and Solomon, driving the
Gentiles from the land, and receiving the homage of the surrounding
nations, whilst every son of Abraham enjoyed opulence and ease. Referring
to this expectation, the Master said, "My kingdom is not of this world :
if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight." His
conception of royalty was founded on service, which would wash the
disciples' feet; on humility, which meekly bore the heavy yoke; on
patience, which would not quench the smoking flax; on suffering, which
flinched not from the cross; on the nobility and dignity of the inner
life, which shone through the most humble circumstances, as the
transfiguration glory through his robes. For this He died. The chief
priests and scribes hunted Him to death, because He persisted in asserting
that He was the true King of men. "And Pilate wrote a title also, and put
it on the cross, Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews."
Conflict in regard to religion.
The people of Christ's day were very
religious. The world likes a flavour of religion. It makes a good
background and screen; it serves to hide much that is unbecoming and
questionable; it is respectable, and satisfies an instinctive longing of
the soul. The world, however, manages its religion in such a way as not to
interfere with its self-aggrandisement, but, in fact, to promote it.
Christ, on the other hand, taught that religion was for the Father in
secret; and consisted, not in the rigorous observance of outward rite, but
in pity, mercy, forgiveness, solitary prayer, and purity of heart.
Thus the Lord's life was the reversal of everything that the world prized.
Wherever He touched it there was conflict and collision, strong antagonism
was evoked, and profound irritation on the part of the poor hollow
appearance-loving world. So it must be with his followers. "These pilgrims
must needs go through the fair. Well, so they did; but behold, even as
they entered into the fair, all the people in the fair were moved, and the
town itself as it were in a hubbub about them. They were clothed with such
kind of raiment as was diverse from the raiment of any who traded in that
fair; few could understand what they said; and the pilgrims set very light
by all their wares. And they did not believe them to be any other than
bedlams and mad. Therefore they took them and beat them, and besmeared
them with dirt, and then put them in the cage, that they might be made a
spectacle to all the men at the fair."
Child of God, your conflict may be altogether hidden from the eyes of
those around you, lonely with the awful loneliness of one in a crowd of
unsympathising strangers, painful with the tribulation that Christ
foretold. You have been ridiculed, sneered at, maligned; your tools
hidden, your goods injured, violence threatened or executed. You have been
as a speckled bird, pecked at by the birds around. But this is the way the
Master went. By these marks you may be sure that you are in the way of his
steps.
III. THE COMMON VICTORY.
"Be of good cheer; I have overcome the world."
In the midst of a battle, when the soldiers are weary with fatigue, galled
with fire, and grimed with smoke, if the general rides into the midst to
cheer them with a few hearty words, and tells them that the key to the
position is in their hands, they cheer him enthusiastically, and take up
new hope. So down the line our Leader and Commander sends the
encouragement of these inspiring words. Let us drink their comfort and
encouragement to the full, that, amid our tribulation, in Him we may have
peace.
He conquered for Himself.
The Lord has shown that a great and
blessed life is possible on conditions which the world pronounces simply
unendurable. He would not accept the world's maxims, would not be ruled by
the world's principles, did despite to the world's most favourite plans.
He even tasted the dregs of reprobation that the world metes out to those
who oppose her, enduring the cross, and despising the shame. But his life
was blessed while it lasted; his name is the dearest and fairest treasure
of our race; and He holds an empire such as none of the world's most
favoured conquerors ever won. Does not this show that the world is a lying
temptress; that there is another and a better policy of life than hers;
that the real sweets and prizes of this brief existence are, after all,
not in her gift? Christ has overcome the world. Her prince came to Him,
but found no response to any of his proposals. He disregarded her
flatteries and threatenings; He would not have her help and despised her
hate; He prosecuted his path in defiance of her, and has left an
imperishable glory behind. Thus He overcame the world.
And He conquered as our Representative and Head.
What He did for Himself He is prepared
to repeat in the life-story of his followers. Ah! lonely soul, thou shalt
not be left unaided to withstand the seductions of the temptress world;
Jesus is with thee, thy Great-heart and Champion. As the Father was with
Him, so He is with thee; so thus thou mayest boldly say, "The Lord is my
helper: I will not fear what man can do unto me."
He does more. Behind the light of this world's glory, Jesus reveals
another; and it is as when the sun rises, while the yellow moon still
lingers in the sky. She comes to have no glory by reason of that glory
which excelleth. We are content with this world until He reveals the glory
of the unseen and eternal; then a holy discontent arises within us, such
as the patriarchs felt towards Canaan, when by faith they beheld the city
which hath foundations. I only say to you, get that vision, and it becomes
as easy for you to refuse the passing and worthless attractions of the
world as for an angel to ignore a wanton's beauty, or a child to make
light of diamonds in the rough.
In Jesus you may have peace.
It is not certainly ours, unless we
follow the two conditions He lays down. First, of abiding in Him; and,
secondly, of meditating on his words. But if these be observed, we shall
have peace in the midst of strife, just as there is an oratory in the
heart of the castle keep; a hollow cone in the midst of the candle flame;
and a centre of safety in the midst of the sweeping whirlwind. Oh, abide
there, child of God!
And, in addition to peace, there shall one day be victory.
We also shall overcome, and shall sit
with Christ on his throne, as He overcame, and sits with the Father upon
his. Then the fruit of the tree of life, immunity from the second death,
the hidden manna, the white stone, the morning star, the confession before
the angels of God, and the pillar in the temple of Eternity! |
|
2
CONSECRATED TO CONSECRATE
"For their sakes I sanctify Myself, that they themselves also may be
sanctified in truth."--John 17:19 (R.V.).
"THE MOST precious fragment of the past," is the unstinted eulogium which
a thoughtful man has passed on this transcendent prayer; transcending in
its scope of view, its expressions, its tender pathos, all other prayers
of which we have record.
Its primary characteristic is timelessness. Though uttered within a few
hours of Calvary, it contains thoughts and expressions which must have
been familiar to our Lord at any moment during the centuries which have
followed. As we study it, therefore, we are listening to words which have
been uttered many times on our behalf, and will be uttered until we are
with Him, where He is, beholding the glory of the divine Son, superadded
to that of the Perfect Servant.
The R.V. margin substitutes the word consecrate for sanctify; and it
probably conveys a better meaning, because devotion to the will of God is
prominent, rather than the holiness of personal character. Devotion to
God's will is the primary thought suggested by the word; but of course it
involves a blameless and spotless character. Thus we might read the words,
"For their sakes I consecrate Myself, that they also may be consecrated in
truth." Through the dim twilight the Lord clearly foresaw what was
awaiting Him--the agony and bloody sweat, the cross and passion, the
foresakenness and travail of his soul. The cross with outstretched arms
waited to receive Him; the midnight darkness to engulf Him; the murderous
band to wreak their hate on the unresisting Lamb--and yet He flinched not,
but went right forward, consecrating Himself.
Twas thus He suffered, though a Son,
Foreknowing, choosing, tasting all;
Until the dreadful work was done,
And drank the bitter cup of gall.
I. THE SUBJECTS OF CHRIST'S SOLICITUDE.
In the earlier verses the Lord speaks of Himself, of his finished work, of
the glory which He had left, of that to which He went; asking only that He
might be able to glorify the Father in every movement of his coming sorrow
(John 17:1, 2, 3,4, 5).
Then He launches Himself on the full current of intercession, and pleads
for those who had been given to Him, as distinguished from the world of
men out of which they had come. Evidently the same thought was in his mind
as inspired his words in John x., when He spoke of the sheep whom the
Father had given to Him, that He might give them eternal life (John 17:27,
28, 29). And it may be that each of these two utterances was inspired by
older words yet, that Zechariah had addressed to the poor of the flock
when he cut asunder his two staves, Beauty and Bands (Zech. 11:7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14).
The underlying conception in all these passages seems to be that the
Father has entrusted to the special keeping of Jesus certain elect spirits
having an affinity to his nature, and who should stand in the inner circle
to Him because associated with Him from high redemptive purpose. All souls
are God's by right of creation, and all are included in the redemption
wrought on the cross; but not all had been included in the divine gift of
which Jesus speaks, "Thine they were, and Thou gavest them Me." We
conclude that in the eternity of the past, as the Father beheld all future
things as though they were present, and surveyed the vast multitudes of
the human family, He discerned those who would be attracted by
indissoluble union with his Son manifest in the flesh; and whom He did
foreknow, these also He did predestinate to be his flock, his brethren and
sisters, his chosen band of associates in his redemptive purpose. These
were the subjects of his powerful solicitude, "I make request, not for the
world, but for those whom Thou hast given Me."
What then? Did not God care for the world? Certainly. He so loved the
world that He gave his only begotten Son.
How then can we reconcile the love of God to the world with the selection
of some as the flock of the Lamb, whilst the great world seems expressly
excluded from his prayer? That question is fitly put. The emphasis is on
the word seems. It is only to the superficial view that the world is
excluded. Are the planets excluded from the law of gravitation because
suns are filled with fire and light? Are the lower orders of creation
excluded from the circle of enjoyment because man with his high
organisation is more richly endowed than they? Are sufferers excluded from
the healing virtues of nature because a comparative few are specially
qualified as surgeons and physicians? Can a missionary be charged with
neglecting a dark continent because he concentrates thought and care on a
few elect spirits gathered around him? For instance, could Columba be held
guilty of neglecting the Picts and Scots when on Iona's lone isle he
focused his care upon the handful of followers who assembled around the
ancient pile, whose ruins are his lasting memorial? There is but one
answer to these questions. Election is not exclusive, but inclusive. Its
purpose is not primarily the salvation or delectation of the few; but
their equipment to become the apostles to the many. And if Jesus thought,
cared, and prayed so much for those whom the Father had given Him, his
ulterior thought was that the world might believe that the Father had sent
Him (John 17:21). If, then, it should be proved that you, my reader, are
not included in the band of the given ones, that would not necessarily
involve you in the eternal condemnation and loss of the future; though it
would exclude you from sharing with Christ in his lofty mission to the
sons of men.
What are the marks, then, that we belong to the inner circle of the given
ones? They are these---
1. That we have come to Him (John 6:37).
2. That we hear his voice, listening for the slightest indication of his
will (John 10:27).
3. That we follow his steps through the world.
4. That we receive his words and believe that the Father sent the Son to
be our Saviour.
5. That the world hates us (John 17:14).
Wheresoever these marks are present, they indicate the hand of the Great
Shepherd and Bishop of souls; and though we be amongst the most timid and
worthless of the flock, He is pledged to keep us so that none shall snatch
us from his hand, and to conduct us through the valley of the shadow to
those dewy upland lawns over which He will lead us for evermore.
II. WHAT HE SOUGHT FOR THEM.
"That they might be consecrated in truth."
Christ does not ask that his own should be forgiven, comforted, supplied
with the good things of life---all thought for these pales in the presence
of his intense desire that they should be consecrated, i.e. inspired by
the same consuming passion as was burning in his heart. He knew that He
was no more in the world. High business connected with its interests
summoned Him to the far country, whither He went to receive the kingdom
and return. But He desired that the passion which filled his soul, his
tears, his prayers, and, to some degree, his sufferings, might always be
represented amongst the sons of men, might be embodied in human lives,
might find utterance through human lips. He could not Himself perpetuate
his corporeal, visible ministry among men; and therefore desired with a
great desire that those whom the Father had given Him should evermore
"show the Lord's death till He come"--not simply by gathering at his
table, but by going forth to live his life, and to fill up that which is
behind of his sufferings.
Is this your life? We have sometimes heard consecration stated as though
it were a matter of choice whether believers should bind themselves by its
obligations or not. When a student enters the university there are certain
subjects in which he must matriculate, but there are special ones which he
may graduate in or not, as he pleases. Should he refuse them, he is not
blamed. The matter is within his option. Now, let it be deafly understood
from these words of Christ that consecration is not in the same sense
optional, but obligatory. For all those whom the Father had given Him He
pleaded with his dying breath that they should be consecrated; and if you
are not consecrated--if there are extensive reserves in your life, if you
are holding back part of the price, if you are saying of aught that you
have, It is my own, I shall do as I choose--then understand that you are
in direct conflict with Christ's purpose and prayer. He asked that you
might be consecrated; and you have chosen to regard consecration as the
craze of the fervid enthusiast.
III. CHRIST'S METHOD OF SECURING THE CONSECRATION OF HIS SERVANTS.
"For their sakes I consecrate Myself."
(1) There is the potency of example.
"Leaving us an example, that ye should
follow his steps."
"He that saith he abideth in Him ought
himself also so to walk, even as He walked." Once when He was praying in a
certain place his disciples said, "Lord, teach us to pray." They had come
within the powerful attraction of his Spirit. Like a swift current it had
caught them, and they were eager to emulate Him. It is impossible for the
saint to gaze long on the stigmata without becoming branded with the marks
of Jesus: impossible to see Him hastening to the cross without being
stirred to follow Him; impossible to behold the intensity of his purpose
for a world's redemption without becoming imbued with it; impossible to
see Him in love with the cross without feeling a similar infatuation. And
it is impossible to behold Him plunging into the dark floods of death that
He might emerge in the sunlit ocean, without the consciousness of the
uprising of an insatiable desire to be like Him, to drink of his cup, and
be baptized with his baptism, to fall into the ground to die that He may
not bide alone, to know the fellowship of his sufferings and conformity to
his death, that He may appoint unto us a kingdom, as the Father hath
appointed to Him.
(2) There is our implication in his mediatorial work.
"I have been crucified with Christ,"
the Apostle said.
And, again, "Ye died with Christ from
the rudiments of the world." Of course, Christ died for us, presenting to
the claims of a broken law a perfect satisfaction and oblation. It is also
true that we died with Him. were in Him as our Representative, wrought
through Him as our Forerunner; the first-fruit sheaf contained the promise
of all its companions.
Consider for a moment a remarkable expression that casts light on this
whole subject. In that memorable discussion with the Jews in Solomon's
porch, which practically closed our Lord's public ministry, He said that
the Father had sanctified and consecrated Him and sent Him into the world
(John 10:36). In these sublime words He undoubtedly refers to a moment
which preceded the Incarnation, when the Godhead designated the Second
Person to redeem men. Was it the same moment, think you, as that in which
Jesus said, "Sacrifice and offering Thou wouldest not, but a body Thou
hast prepared Me (or, mine ears hast Thou pierced). I delight to do thy
will, O my God"? If so, what an august scene that must have been when, in
the presence of the assembled hierarchies of heaven, the Father solemnly
set apart the Son for his redemption work; consecrating Him to bring in
everlasting salvation, to destroy the works of the devil, and to bring
together in one the children of God that are scattered abroad!
In that solemn consecration of the Head all the members were included. The
King stood for his kingdom; the Shepherd for his flock. Any who refuse to
be consecrated contravene and contradict that momentous decision.
When Christ approached his death in these words, He renewed his act of
consecration, and again implicated those who belong to Him; bearing us
with Him, He went to the cross; involving us by his actions, He yielded
Himself up to death. In his holy purpose we were quickened together with
Him, and raised up together, and made to sit together in the heavenly
places; and by the same emphasis with which we declare ourselves to be
his, we confess that we are amongst those who are bound to a life of
consecration. We are pledged to it by union with our Lord. We cannot draw
back from the doorpost to which He was nailed without proving that we are
deficient in appreciating the purpose which brought Him to our world, the
surrender that withheld not his face from spitting, his soul from the
shadow of death.
IV. OUR DUTY.
"Yield yourselves unto God."
When Abraham Lincoln dedicated, for the
purposes of a graveyard, the field of Gettysburg, where so many brave
soldiers had lost their lives, he said: "We cannot dedicate, we cannot
consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men who struggled here
have consecrated it far beyond our power to add or detract. It is for us,
the living, rather to be dedicated to the unfinished work which they who
fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be
here dedicated to the great task remaining before us, that from these
honoured dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave
the last full measure of devotion; and that we here highly resolve that
these dead shall not have died in vain."
These noble words, when we have made the needful alterations and
adaptations, are most applicable to our present point. Let us dedicate
ourselves to the great task before us, and to which Jesus has pledged us.
Let us devote ourselves to the great cause for which Jesus died. Let us
highly resolve that He shall not have died in vain. Let us offer and
present ourselves, our souls and bodies, to be a reasonable, holy, and
living sacrifice unto God, that his will might be done through us, as it
is done in heaven.
My Master, lead me to thy door;
Pierce this now willing ear once more;
Thy bonds are freedom, let me stay
With Thee, to toil, endure, obey.
"Yes; ear and hand, and thought and will!
Use all in thy dear slavery still!
Serf's weary liberties I cast
Beneath thy feet; there keep them fast.' |
|
3 THE
LORD'S PRAYER FOR HIS PEOPLE'S ONENESS
"That they all may be one... One in us... That they may be one, even as we
are one Perfect in one."--John 17:21-23.
THUS OUR High Priest pleaded, and thus He pleads. In all the power of his
endless life He ever liveth to bear this great petition on his heart: and
as the weight of the jewelled breastplate lay heavy on the heart of the
high priest of old, so does it press on Him, as the ages slowly pass by in
their never-ceasing progress towards the consummation of all things.
Listen to that voice, sweet and full as the distant rush of many waters,
as it pleads in the midst of eternity that those who believe in Him may be
one.
Nor is it true that this prayer awaits an answer indefinitely future.
There seems good reason to believe, as we shall see, that in these words
our Lord was making a request which began to be fulfilled on the day of
Pentecost, and is being fulfilled continually--although the oneness which
is being realised is still, like his kingdom, in mystery, and is waiting
for the manifestation of the sons of God. Then, as the gauzy mists of time
part before the breath of God, the accomplished oneness of the Church
shall stand revealed.
I. THE ONENESS OF BELIEVERS IS A SPIRITUAL ONENESS.
Can there be any reasonable doubt of this when our Master asks so clearly
that we may be one, as the Father and He are one? The model for Christian
unity is evidently the unity between the Father and Son by the Holy
Spirit; and since that unity, the unity of the blessed God, is not
corporeal, nor physical, nor substantial to the eye of the flesh, may we
not infer--nay, are we not compelled to infer--that the oneness of
believers is to be after the same fashion; and to consist in so close an
identity of nature, so absolute an interfusion of spirit, as that they
shall be one in aim, and thought, and life, and spirit--spiritually one
with each other, because spiritually one with Him?
The Church of Rome, which has ever travestied in gross material forms the
most spiritual conceptions of God, sought to prove herself the true Church
by achieving a oneness of her own. It was an outward and visible oneness.
In the apostate church everyone must utter the same formularies, worship
in the same postures, and belong to the same ecclesiastical system. And
her leaders did their best to realise their dream. They endeavoured to
exterminate heresy by fire, and sword, and torture. They spread their
network through the world. And just before the dawn of the Reformation
they seemed to have succeeded. At the beginning of the sixteenth century,
Europe reposed in the monotony of almost universal uniformity, beneath the
almost universal supremacy of the Papacy. Rome might indeed have adopted
the insolent language of the Assyrian of prophecy : "As one gathereth eggs
that are left, have I gathered all the earth; and there was none that
moved the wing, or opened the mouth, or peeped." And what was the result?
What but the deep sleep of spiritual death? And herein lay the most
crushing condemnation of the Roman Catholic conception of the unity of the
Church.
Many modern notions of Christian unity seem to proceed on the same line.
The assent to a certain credal basis, the meeting in great catholic
conventions, the exchange of pulpits--these seem to exhaust the
conceptions of large numbers, and to satisfy their ideal. But surely there
is a bond of union--deeper, holier, more vital and more blessed than any
of these--which shyly reveals itself, now and again, in one or more of
them, but is independent of all, and when all of them are wanting, still
constitutes us one. And what is that bond of union but-the possession of a
common spiritual life, like that which unites the Father and the Son; and
which pervades us also, making us one with each other, because we are
already one with God?
You may not care to admit it; you may even be ignorant of the full meaning
of this marvellous fact; you may live an exclusive life, never going
beyond the wails of some small conventicle, or the barriers of some strict
ecclesiastical system; you may bear yourself impatiently and brusquely
towards those who differ from you; you may even brand them with your
anathema : but if they are one with God, by his gracious indwelling Spirit
of Life, and if you are also one with Him, you positively cannot help
being one with them. Your creed may differ, or your mode of worship, or
your views about the Church; but you cannot be otherwise than one with
those who are one with God, in a union which is not material but
spiritual. ,
II. THIS ONENESS ALSO ADMITS
OF GREAT VARIETY.
"One, as Thou, Father, art in Me, and I in Thee." Now, of course, we all
admit the unity of the Godhead. The first article of the Jew is also the
first article of the Christian, that the Lord our God is one God, one in
essence, one in purpose, one in action. The Son does nothing of Himself;
the Father does nothing apart from the Son; the Holy Ghost proceedeth from
the Father and the Son. We cannot, as yet, understand this mystery; but
with reverence we accept it as the primary basis of our faith.
But though God is One, there is evidently a variety of function in the
ever-blessed Trinity. The Father decrees, the Son executes. The Father
sends, the Son is sent. The Father works in Creation, the Son in
Redemption and Judgment. And the functions of both Father and Son differ
from those of the Holy Spirit.
Since then, according to our Lord's request, the unity of the Church is to
resemble the unity of the Godhead, we may expect that it will not be
physical, nor mechanical, nor a uniformity; but that it will be variety in
unity--a unity of spirit and purpose, and yet a unity which admits of very
diverse functions and operations. Diversities of gifts, but the same
Spirit; differences of administrations, but the same Lord; diversities of
operations, but the same God who worketh all in all.
(1) The very conception of unity involves variety.
You take me out into a piece of waste
land, and pointing to a heap of bricks, say, "There is a unity." I at once
rebut your assertion; there is uniformity undoubtedly, but not unity.
Unity requires that a variety of different things should be combined to
form one structure and carry out one idea. A collection of bricks is not a
unity, but a house is. A pole is not a unity, but a hop-plant is. A snow
atom is not a unity, but a snow crystal is. And when our Lord spoke of his
disciples as one, He not only expected that there would be varieties
amongst them, in character, mind, and ecclesiastical preference; but by
the very choice of his words He meant us to infer that it would be so. The
unity on which He set his heart was not a uniformity.
(2) But with variety there may be the truest unity.
There is variety in the human
body--from eyelash to foot, from heart to blood-disc, from brain to
quivering nerve-fibre; yet, in all this variety, each one is conscious of
an indivisible unity. There is variety in the tree: the giant arms that
wrestle with the storm, the far-spreading roots that moor it to the soil,
the myriad leaves in which the wind makes music, the cones or nuts which
it flings upon the forest floor; yet for all this it is one. There is
variety in the Bible: variety of authorship--king, prophet, priest,
herdman, fisherman, scholar, sage, and saint; variety of style--prose,
poetry, psalmody, argument, appeal; variety of age--from the days of Moses
to those of John, the beloved apostle, writing amid the persecutions of
the empire. Yet for all this there is a oneness in the Bible which no mere
binding could give. So with the Church of Christ: there may be, there must
be, infinite varieties and shades of thought and work. Some will prefer
the methods of Wesley, others the freedom of Congregationalism. Some will
pray most naturally through the venerable words of a liturgy, others in
the deep silence of a Friends' Meeting; some will thrive best beneath the
crozier of the Bishop, others in the plain barracks of the Salvation Army.
But, notwithstanding all this variety, there may be a deep spiritual
unity--many folds, but one flock; many regiments, but one army; many
stones, but one breastplate. "There is one body, and one Spirit, even as
ye are called in one hope of your calling; one Lord, one faith, one
baptism; one God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and
in you all."
III. THE BASIS OF CHRISTIAN
UNITY IS THE UNION OF EACH BELIEVER TO CHRIST.
"I in them, that they may be made perfect in one." However much true
believers in Christ differ, there are two points in which they agree.
(1) Each believer is in Christ
In Christ's heart, loved with an
everlasting love, the beloved name engraven on its secret tables; in
Christ's book, enrolled on those pages which are sealed so fast that He
alone can break the sevenfold seal; in Christ's hand, which holds the
ocean as a drop upon its palm, and which was pierced on Calvary, from
which no power shall ever pluck the trembling soul; in Christ's grace,
rooted as a tree in luxuriant soil, or a house in a foundation of rock;
but above all in Christ's Person, for He is the Head, "from whom the whole
body is fitly flamed and knit together by that which every joint supplieth."
There are innumerable texts which speak of the Church as the Body of
Christ (Eph. 1:23; Col. 1:24); and directly a man believes in Christ, he
becomes a member of that mystical body. "We are members of his body, of
his flesh, and of his bones." You may be a very obscure member, or even a
paralysed member; but be sure of this, if you are a Christian you are in
Christ, as the eye is in the eye-socket, the arm in the shoulder-joint,
and the finger in the hand.
(2) Christ is in each believer.
The texts that teach Christ's real
presence in the believer are as numerous as spring flowers. "Christ liveth
in me." "Know ye not that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobate?
.... Ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in Me, and I in you."
The Lord Jesus is in the heart which makes Him welcome--as the steam is in
the piston, as the sap is in the branch, as the blood is in the heart, as
the life is in the body. It would be impossible for words to describe a
more intense spiritual Oneness than that which is here presented to us.
The Saviour is in each of us; as the Father is in Him and we are in Him,
and He in God. "Our life is hid with Christ in God." Therefore we are not
only one with Jesus Christ. but through Him we are one with God. "I in
them, Thou in Me." The very life of God is pouring its glorious tides
through us, and would do so more largely if only we were more receptive
and obedient. He pours water out of the mouth of the Congo at the rate of
a million tons per second; and is willing to do marvels as mighty through
each believer. And as this life permeates us all alike, it makes us one,
not only with the blessed God, but with all who believe--as the blood
makes all the members of the body one, and the sap the branches of the
tree.
IV. THE MEANS OF THIS
SPIRITUAL UNITY ARE THE INFLUENCES OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.
Influence means inflow. It was by the Holy Spirit that our Lord's human
nature was made one with his Father's. And this same Holy Spirit He has
bequeathed to us, that He may be the same bond of spiritual life between
us and our Lord as He was between our Lord and his Father. May not this be
the meeting of his words: "The glory which Thou gavest Me I have given
them; that they may be one, even as we are one"? May not that glory have
consisted in the oneness of his human nature with God the Father, by the
Holy Spirit? And if so, it may be shared by us. The more believers receive
the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, the more clearly will they appreciate
this great mystery, and the more closely will they be drawn to all other
believers; hushing jealous thoughts and uncharitable words, and
"endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace."
It is abundantly clear, then, that this unity cannot be broken unless we
break away from Christ. Men have used the word schism with terrible
effect. If a man has broken away from some visible church, they have
pointed to him as a schismatic. But what is schism? It is breaking away
from the Body of Christ. But what is the Body of Christ? The Roman
Catholic will tell you that it is the Church of Rome; the Anglican will
tell you that it is the Church of England; the High Churchman will tell
you that it is the collection of churches which hold the doctrine of
Apostolical Succession. What vestige of Scriptural proof is there for
these assertions? What an absurdity it is to be told that we must submit
to an outward rite, or we cannot belong to the Body of Christi What, then,
would become of all the saints and martyrs who died without membership
with one of these visible organisations? No; the Body of Christ, as
Scripture plainly teaches, is that great multitude which no man can
number, of all nations, and kindreds, and peoples, and tongues, and sects,
and eras, who are united by faith with the Saviour. The Church of Christ
is not conterminous with any earthly or visible organisation; it is long
as the ages, wide as the poles, broad as the charity of God; it includes
all in heaven and on earth who hold the Head. The only condition of
membership in that Church is simple faith in Christ. And the only method
of severance from that Church is through the severance of the soul's trust
in Christ. He only is a schismatic who ceases to be Christ's.
The papal legate told Savonarola that he cut him off from the Church
Militant and from the Church Triumphant. "From the Church Militant you
may," was the martyr's reply; "but from the Church Triumphant, never!" It
was well spoken; but Savonarola might have gone further, and defied the
scarlet-coated functionary even to cut him off from the Church
Militant--nothing could do that but apostasy. A man may be excommunicated
from our church systems, or he may never have belonged to one of them; but
so long as he believes in Christ, he is a member of the Holy Catholic
Church. And schism is more likely to be charged against those who violate
the spirit of Christian charity in making harsh and false statements
against their fellow-members in the Body of Christ. Let us not retaliate,
lest we also commit that sin. We can afford to wait. Five minutes in
heaven, or less, will settle it all.
The object for which Christ prayed is already being partially
accomplished. The world may not be as yet surrendering to the claims of
Jesus Christ, but it is becoming increasingly impressed with his divine
mission: "that the world may believe that Thou hast sent Me." And in
proportion as the Holy Spirit pervades and fills the hearts of the
children of God, the manifestation of the life of God in them and through
them will have an ever-increasing effect, and will do what church systems
and even the preachings of her thousand pulpits cannot effect in
convincing and saving men.
Let us remember that Christ's own conception of the unity of his Church is
that which is the result of the indwelling of the one Spirit. Such unity
is already a fact in the eye of God, though undiscerned as yet in all its
fullness by men. Let us thank God that this marvellous request has been
already so largely realised; and let us dare to hold fellowship as
Christians with all those who are indwelt by the Spirit of Life which is
also in Christ Jesus. |
|
4 THE
LOVE THAT BOUND CHRIST TO THE CROSS
"Jesus therefore, knowing all things that should come upon Him, went
forth, and said unto them, Whom seek ye?"--John 18:4.
THE CEDRON was never more than a mountain brook, and it is now dry. Its
stony bed alone shows where it used to flow through the valley that
separated Mount Zion from the Mount of Olives. The main road which led
from the city gate, over the Mount of Olives to Bethany and Jericho,
crossed it by an ancient bridge, from which, on this especial night, a
fair scene must have presented itself.
Above, the Passover moon was shining in full-orbed splendour, turning
night into day. Beneath, the little stream was brawling down the valley,
catching the moonlight on its wavelets. On the one slope dark, thick
woods, above which rose the ancient walls and gates of the city; on the
other, the swelling slopes of Olivet. Presently the Lord emerged out of
the shadow, engaged in earnest converse with the apostles; crossed the
bridge, but, instead of pursuing the path as it wound upward towards
Bethany and Bethphage, they all turned into a large enclosure, well known
as the garden of the oil-press, and which we know best as Gethsemane.
Somewhere, no doubt, within its enclosure stood the rock-hewn trough in
which the rich juicy olives were trodden by naked feet. "When Jesus had
spoken these words, He went forth with his disciples over the brook Cedron,
where was a garden, into the which He entered, and his disciples."
The sequel was so fully narrated by the other evangelists that there was
no need for the writer of this narrative to tell of the awful anguish, the
broken cries, the bloody sweat, the running to and fro of the disciples,
the sleep of the chosen three, the strengthening angel. He confines
himself almost entirely to the circumstances of the Lord's arrest.
Two hours only had passed since Judas left the Supper-table; but that had
given him all the time needed for the completion of his plan. Hastening to
the authorities, he had told them that the favourable moment had arrived
for his Master's arrest; that he knew the lonely spot to which He was wont
to resort for meditation and prayer; and that he had need of an armed band
to overpower all possible resistance on the part of Himself or his
followers. This they were able to supply from the guards and custodians of
the Temple. They were going against One who was deserted and defenceless;
yet the soldiers were armed with sticks and staves. They were about to
arrest One who would make no attempt at flight or concealment, and the
moon was full; yet, lest he should make his escape to some limestone
grotto, or amid the deep shadows, they carried torches and lanterns.
The Lord had just awoke his disciples for the third and last time, when
probably his ear detected the tread of hurrying feet, the muffled clank of
swords, the stifled murmur of an advancing crowd; perhaps He saw also the
glancing lights, as they advanced through the garden shrubs, and began to
encircle the place where He had prayed. By such signs, and especially by
the inner intimation of the Holy Spirit, He knew all things that should
come upon Him; and without waiting for his enemies to reach Him, with calm
and dignified composure He went forth to meet the rabble band, stepping
out into the moonlight and saluting them with the inquiry, "'Whom seek
ye?"
There are some deep and memorable suggestions here as to the voluntariness
of Christ's death. In order to his death having any value it must be free.
If it could be shown that He had no choice but to die, because his own
purpose was overmastered by the irresistible force of circumstances, his
death could not have met the claims of a broken law, or inaugurated a new
code of morals to his Church. But there are several points in this
narrative which make it clear that He laid down his life of Himself--that
none took it from Him; that He had power to lay it down, and power to take
it again.
(1) When Jesus asked them the question, "Whom seek ye?" there were,
no doubt, many in the band who knew Him well enough, and that He was the
object of their midnight raid; but not one of them had the courage to
answer, "Thee." A paralysing awe had already commenced to cast its spell
over their spirits. Those who knew Him shrank from identifying Him, and
were content to answer generally, "Jesus of Nazareth." But when He
answered, "I am He," what was it that so suddenly affected them? Did some
stray beams of concealed glory burst forth from their confinement to
indicate his majesty? Did they dread the putting-forth of that power which
had been so often exerted to save and bless? Or was there a direct miracle
of Divine power, which secured their discomfiture? We cannot tell. But,
whatever the cause, the crowd suddenly fell back in confusion, and were
flung to the ground.
Here, for a moment, the would-be captors lay, as though pinioned to the
dust by some unseen hand. The spell was soon withdrawn, and they were
again on their feet, cursing themselves for their needless panic. But--and
this is the point--the power that sent that rough hireling band reeling
backwards to the ground could easily have held them there, or plunged them
as Korah, Dathan, and Abiram into living graves. "One flash came forth to
tell of the sleeping lightning which He would not use"; and then, having
revealed the might which could have delivered Him from their puny arms, He
returned to his attitude of willing self-surrender. Who, then, shall say
that our Saviour's death was not his own act and deed?
(2) When that rabble crew were again on their feet, confronting
Jesus, He asked them a second time, "'Whom seek ye?" Again they replied,
"Jesus of Nazareth." Jesus answered, "I have told you that I am He; if,
therefore, ye seek Me, let these go their way." And, forthwith, He put
forth such a power over his own as secured their freedom from arrest.
It is evident that it was no part of his foes' purpose beforehand to let
them go; for on their way back they arrested a young man, probably Mark
himself, whom curiosity had drawn from his bed, and whom they took for one
of his disciples. He escaped with great difficulty from their hands. It is
hardly doubtful that if some special power had not been exerted over them,
they would have treated the whole of the followers of Jesus as they sought
to treat Him. Is it not evident, then, that the power which secured the
safety of his disciples could have secured that of the Master Himself; or
that He might have passed away through the midst of them, as He did
through the infuriated crowd which proposed to cast Him headlong over the
precipice near Nazareth at the commencement of his ministry? Every arm
might have been struck nerveless, every foot paralysed with lameness. Who,
then, shall deny that Christ's death was his own act?
(3) But again, when Jesus had spoken thus there seemed some
wavering among his captors--perhaps a hesitation as to who should first
lay hand on Him. At this juncture, when the whole enterprise threatened to
miscarry, Judas felt that he must, at all hazards, show how safe it was to
touch the person of his Master; so, though the bold challenge of Jesus had
made the preconcerted signal needless, he resolved still to give it, that
the spell of that presence might be broken. The traitor, therefore,
stepped up and kissed the Lord.
Encouraged by this sacrilegious act, his myrmidons now laid hands on
Jesus, grasping his sacred person as they might have done Barabbas, or
some other member of his gang. They then proceeded to bind Him after the
merciless Roman fashion. Peter could not bear to see this. He sprang forth
from the covert of the shadow, drew his sword, and cut at the nearest
assailant's head. But the blade, glancing off the helmet, cut off the ear.
It was an unwelcome interference with the behaviour of the meek and gentle
Lord, whose hand was already bound. It could not be permitted. "Suffer ye
thus far," He said to the rude soldier who was binding Him; and with his
own finger touched the ear, stanched the flowing blood, and healed it. It
has been remarked that this was the only act of healing wrought on one for
whom it was not asked of Him, and who had no faith in his beneficent
power. But, surely, the hand that could work that miracle could have
broken from the bonds that held it as easily as Samson from the two new
cords which burnt as flax in the flame. The power with which Jesus saved
others might have saved Himself. Who, then, shall say that his death was
not his own free act? Listen, moreover, to his own words. Then said Jesus
unto Peter, "Put up thy sword into the sheath; the cup which my Father
hath given Me, shall I not drink it? .... Thinkest thou that I cannot now
pray to my Father, and He shall presently give Me more than twelve legions
of angels; but how then shall the Scripture be fulfilled that thus it must
be?"
As, then, we view the death of the cross we must ever remember the
voluntariness of that supreme act, which is all the more conspicuous as
the agony of the garden reminds us how greatly the Lord's spirit dreaded
the awful pressure of the world's sin, which made Him cry: "My God, my
God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?" How greatly He must have loved us! It was
love, and only love, that kept Him standing at the bar of Pilate, bending
beneath the scourge of the soldiers, hanging in apparent helplessness on
the cross. Not the iron band of relentless fate; not the overpowering
numbers or closely-woven plots of his foes; not the nails that pierced his
quivering flesh. No, it was none of these. It was not even the compulsion
of the Divine purpose. It was his own choice, because of a love that would
bear all things if only it might achieve redemption for those whom He
loved more than Himself. "He loved me, and gave Himself for me."
Surely we may trust that love. If it moved Him to endure the cross and
despise the shame, is there anything that it will withhold, anything that
it will not do? His love is stronger than death, and mightier than the
grave. Strong waters cannot quench it, floods cannot drown it. It silences
all praise, and beggars all recompense. To believe and accept it is
eternal life. To dwell within its embrace is the foretaste of everlasting
joy. To be filled by it is to be transfigured into the image of God
Himself. |
|
5
DRINKING THE CUP
"The cup which my Father hath given Me, shall I not drink it?"--John
18:1-14.
IN OUR Master's arrest the one feature which stands out in unique
splendour is its voluntariness. He went into the garden "knowing all
things that should come upon Him." Even at the last moment He might have
evaded the kiss of the traitor, and the binding thong with which Malchus
sought to manacle his gracious hands. The spell of his intrinsic nobleness
and glory, which had flung his captors to the ground, might have held them
there; the power that could heal the wounded ear might have destroyed with
equal ease the entire band.
The reason for all this hardly needs explaining. His life and death were
not merely a sacrifice, but a self-sacrifice. He freely gave Himself up
for us all. Each believer may dare to appropriate the words of the Apostle
: "He loved me, and gave Himself for me." It was through the Eternal
Spirit that He offered Himself without spot to God. It was from his own
invincible love that He gave Himself for the Church, his Bride. "From
beginning to end the moving spring of all his actions was deliberate
self-devotedness to the good of men, and the fulfilment of God's will, for
these are equivalents. And his death as the crowning act of this career
was to be conspicuously a death embodying and exhibiting the spirit of
self-sacrifice." Let us learn:
I. THE SUPREME NOBILITY OF
SURRENDER TO THE EVITABLE.
It is, of course, most noble, when the martyr goes to his death without a
murmur of complaint; allowing his enemies to wreak their vengeance without
recrimination or threatening; bowing the meek head to the block; extending
the hand to the hungry flame. He has no alternative but to die; there are
no legions waiting under arms to obey his summons; no John of Gaunt to
stand beside him, as beside Wycliffe, to see him fairly tried and insist
on his acquittal Then, there is nothing for it but to evince the patience
and gentleness of Christ in being led as a lamb to the slaughter.
But though this spectacle stirs the hearts of men, there is one still more
illustrious--when the sufferer bends to a fate which he might easily
avoid, but confronts for the sake of others. The former is submission to
the inevitable, this to the evitable. That is bearing a yoke which is
imposed by superior authority; this taking a yoke which might be evaded
without blame, as judged by the tribunal of public opinion. And this is
the sublimest spectacle on which the eye of man or angel can rest; for
thus the sacrifice of Christ finds its noblest counterpart and fulfilment.
When a missionary, with ample means and loving friends, deliberately
spends among squalid and repulsive conditions the precious years which
might have been passed among congenial society and luxurious comfort in
the homeland; chooses a lot from which nature inevitably shrinks instead
of that to which every conclusion but one points; and stays at his post,
though his return, so far from being resented, would actually be favoured
by all whose opinion is of weight--this is a voluntary submission to the
evitable.
When a home pastor stays by his poor flock because they need him so
sorely, and sets his face towards grinding poverty and irksome toil when
the city church invites him to a larger stipend and wealthier
surroundings--this again is a voluntary surrender to the evitable.
When a wealthy bachelor is willing to forego the ease and quiet of his
beautiful home to welcome the orphans of his deceased brother, who might
have been sent to some charitable institution or cast on strangers, that
they may be beneath his personal supervision, and have a better chance in
life--this again is voluntary submission to the evitable.
In each such case, it is not inevitable that the cross should be borne,
and the hands yielded to the binding thong. The tongue of scandal could
hardly find cause for criticism if the easier path were chosen. Perhaps
the soul hardly realises the kindredness of its resolve with the loftiest
that this world has seen--but it is superlatively beautiful, nevertheless.
And let it never be forgotten, that nothing short of this will satisfy the
standard of Christ. No Christian has a right to use all his rights. None
can claim immunity from the duty of seeking the supreme good of others,
though it involve the supreme cost to himself.
II. THE RECOGNITION OF GOD'S
WILL IN HIS PERMISSIONS.
In the bitter anguish which had immediately preceded the arrest, our Lord
had repeatedly referred to his cup. "If this cup," He said, "may not pass
from Me, except I drink it, thy will be done." The "cup" evidently
referred to all the anguish caused to his holy nature in being numbered
among the transgressors, and having to bear the sin of the world. Whether
it was the anguish of the body, beneath which He feared He would succumb,
as some think; or the dread of being made a sin-offering, a scapegoat
laden with sins, as others; or the chill of the approaching eclipse, which
extorted the cry of forsakenness, as seems to me the more likely--is not
pertinent to our present consideration. It is enough to know that, whilst
there was much that cried, "Back!" there was more that cried, "On!"--and
that He chose from the profoundest depths of his nature, to do the
Father's will, to execute his part in the compact into which they had
entered before the worlds were made, and to drink to the dregs the cup
which his Father had placed in his hands.
But here we note that to all appearances the cup was mingled, prepared,
and presented by the malignity and hate of man. The high priests had long
resolved to put Him to death, because his success with the people, his
fresh and living comments on the law, his opposition to their hypocrisies
and pretensions had exasperated them to madness. Judas also seemed to have
had a conspicuous share in his discovery and arrest. Had we been left to
our unaided reasonings we might have supposed that the most bitter
ingredients of his cup had been supplied by the ingratitude of his own,
the implacable rancour of the priests, and the treachery of Judas; but,
see, He recognises none but the Father --it is always the Father, always
the cup which the Father had given.
There have been times in our lives when we may have been tempted to
distinguish between God's appointments and permissions, and to speak of
the former as being manifestly his will for us, whilst we suspended our
judgment about the latter, and questioned if we were authorised in
accounting them as being equally from Heaven. But such distinctions are
fatal to peace. Our souls were kept in constant perturbation, as we
accounted ourselves the shuttlecock of rival powers, now God's, now man's.
And we ended in ruling God out of more than half our life, and regarding
ourselves as the hapless prey of strong and malicious forces to which we
were sold, as Joseph to the Ishmaelites.
A deeper reading of Scripture has led us to a truer conclusion. There is
no such distinction there. What God permits is as equally his will as what
He appoints. Joseph tells his brethren that it was not they who sent him
to Egypt, but God. David listens meekly to Shimei's shameful words,
because he feels that God allowed them to be spoken. And here Jesus
refuses to see the hand of his foes in his sufferings, but passes beyond
the hand which bore the cup to his lips to the Father who was permitting
it to be presented, and reposed absolutely in the choice for Him of One
who loved Him with a love that was before the foundation of the world.
O sufferer! whether by those strokes, which, like sickness or bereave,
merit, seem to come direct from Heaven, or by those which, like malicious
speeches or oppressive acts, seem to emanate from man. look up into the
face of God, and say, "My Father, this is thy will for me; thine angels
would have delivered me, had it been best. But since they have not
interposed, I read thy choice for thy child, and I am satisfied. It is
sweet to drink the cup which thy hands have prepared."
III. THE DEEP LAW OF
SUBSTITUTION.
Some of the rabble crowd had probably shown signs of a disposition to
arrest some of Christ's followers. He, therefore, interfered, and reminded
them of their own admission, that He was the object of their midnight
raid, and bade them allow these to go their way. Is it surprising that the
evangelist generalises this act, finding in it an illustration of his
Master's ceaseless interposition on behalf of his own--that of those whom
the Father had given Him He should lose none? In brief, this scene affords
a conspicuous and striking illustration of the great doctrine of
substitution. As the Good Shepherd steps to the front and sheathes the
swords of his foes in his own breast, while He demands the release of the
cowering flock, He is doing on a small scale what He did once and for ever
on Calvary; when, exposing Himself to the penalty due to sin, and braving
the concentrated antagonism of a broken law, the drawn sword of inviolable
justice, the sharpness of death, the shame of the cross, and the
humiliation of the grave, He said, "If ye seek Me, let these go their
way." Christ sheltered us without reckoning the cost to Himself. He stood
to the front, and bore the extreme brunt of all that was to be borne. He
substituted his suffering for ours, his wounds for our pain, his death for
our sins. If you are fearing the just recompense of your sins, like a band
of arresting soldiers lurking in the dark shadows and threatening to drag
you forth to pay the uttermost farthing, take heart; Jesus has met, and
will meet, them for you. Listen to his majestic voice, saying, "Take Me;
but let this soul, who clings to the skirts of my robe, go his way." He is
arrested, and led away; thou art free--that in thy freedom thou shouldest
give thyself to be his very slave. |
|
6 THE
HALL OF ANNAS
"They led Him away to Annas first, for he was father-in-law to Caiaphas,
which was the high priest that same year."--John 18:13.
THE BAND that had arrested Jesus led Him back across the Cedron bridge, up
the steep ascent, and through the ancient gateway, which at this season of
the year stood always open, even at night.
The passage of the armed men through the quiet streets must have aroused
from their slumbers many sleepers, who hurried to the windows to see them
pass below in the clear moonlight. But no one guessed who was being taken
into custody; and most of them probably thought that the soldiers had
captured some more of the Barabbas gang, who, at that season of the year,
would make a rare harvest by plundering pilgrims to the feast.
Their destination, in the first place, was the mansion of Annas, the head
of the reigning priestly family, who was father-in-law of the actual high
priest. He was now an old man--wealthy, aristocratic, and laden with all
the honours his nation could give. For many years he had worn the high
priest's robes, and though he had now nominally retired from that exalted
office, he still kept his hand upon the reins of government. Caiaphas, at
the time of which we speak, had held the priesthood for seventeen years
under his tutelage; and he retained it for five years after. It is easy
therefore to understand why Annas is described as the high priest. He was
still the most powerful living bearer of that title. The whole family
partook of his character, and was notorious for unwearied plotting. The
gliding, deadly, snake-like smoothness with which Annas and his sons
seized their prey is said to have won them the name of "hissing vipers."
Annas and Caiaphas probably shared the same cluster of buildings, which
was presumably the official residence of the high-priestly family. In the
East the houses of the great are frequently a group of buildings of
unequal height standing near each other and surrounded by the same court,
but with passages between, independent entrances, and separate roofs.
Sometimes they would form a square or quadrangle with porticos and
corridors around it, plants and fountains in the midst, and a slight
awning overhead to protect the open courtyard from the sun or rain, the
communication with the street being through a smaller courtyard and
archway, called in the Gospels "a porch." In some such cluster of splendid
buildings Annas and Caiaphas and others of their family would live, and
the whole would be called the high priest's palace.
In one of the large reception halls Annas waited, impatient and feverish,
to know the result of the midnight expedition. He had a nervous dread of
what Jesus might do when driven to bay; and feared lest the secret should
leak out, and the Galilean pilgrims rise in defence of their favourite
Prophet, whom four days before they had escorted into the city with
shouts. What if Judas should not prove true? All these disquieting
thoughts chased each other like pursuing phantoms through his mind; and it
was an immense relief when the clank of weapons in the court assured him
of the safe return of Malchus' party, and answering voices told him that
Jesus was at last safe within his power.
The prisoner was at once brought before the old man, who eagerly
scrutinized his features in the flickering light of lanterns and
flambeaux, casting shadows which a Rembrandt would have loved to paint.
One or two intimates may have stood around him; but the main inquiry was
left to himself, as he put the Master through a preliminary and informal
examination, in the hope of extracting from his replies materials on which
the Court, which was hastily summoned for an early hour in the morning,
might proceed.
On the surface the inquiry seemed fair and innocent enough. The high
priest, we learn from John 18:19, asked Jesus of his disciples and his
doctrine. But the lamb-skin hid a wolf. For the questions were so worded
as to entangle, and to provide material on which to found the subsequent
charge, which was even then being framed, that Jesus was a disturber of
the public peace, and a teacher of revolutionary doctrine.
First, then, about his disciples.--Annas would like to be informed what
this association of men meant. Why were they formed into a society? By
what bond were they united? What secret instructions had they received?
What hidden objects had they in view? If Jesus refused to answer these
questions, might it not be made to appear that an attempt was on foot to
organize a confederation throughout the entire country? If so, it would be
easy to awaken the jealousy of the Roman authorities, and lead them to
feel that they must take immediate steps to stamp out the plot by
executing the ringleader.
And, next, as to his doctrine.--Had not Jesus repeatedly spoken about the
Kingdom of Heaven? What did this mean? Was He contemplating the setting-up
of a kingdom? Did He intend it to be understood that He was the expected
Messiah, and that He meditated revolt against Rome? Was the manifestation
of force, which had accompanied his recent entrance into the city, at his
instigation?
Our Lord at once penetrated the design of his crafty interrogator. And in
his answer He took care not to mention his disciples, speaking only of
Himself. He affirmed that He had nothing to say which He had not already
said a hundred times in the synagogues and the Temple, before friends and
foes. He had no secret doctrines for the initiated, but had declared all
that was in his heart. Between his disciples and Himself there had been no
connection other than was obvious on the surface. No meetings under cover
of night; no discussions of revolutionary topics; nothing that could not
bear the fullest scrutiny. "I spake openly to the world; I ever taught in
the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort; and in
secret [that is, in the sense in which you use the word] have I said
nothing. Why askest thou Me? Ask them which heard Me, what I said unto
them: behold, they know what I said."
Our Lord's reference to those who had heard Him is probably an allusion to
the armies of spies whom Annas had set on his track, watching his actions,
reporting his words. Was not this examination of the prisoner a confession
that the close scrutiny to which He had been subjected for so long had
failed to elicit aught on which a criminal charge could be based? Jesus
knew that his most secret words had been tortured in vain to yield an
accusation against Him. How great, then, was the hypocrisy which could
feign ignorance! How evident it was that Annas was only intent on
inveigling his prisoner to say something on which to base his
after-accusation.
All this was implied in our Lord's noble and transparent words. We shall
see that He adopted another tone when He was properly arraigned before the
assembled Sanhedrim; but in this more private, injudicial, inquisitorial
interview, with one scathing rebuke He tore away the cloak of assumed
ignorance with which this crafty man veiled his sinister purpose, and laid
his secret thoughts open to the gaze of all.
For the time Annas was silenced. He had made small headway in the informal
examination of his prisoner, and he now gave it up. Whatever resentment he
may have felt at our Lord's answer he carefully concealed, biding the hour
when he might vent the vials of his hate without stint.
We must not suppose there was any anger in that long-suffering heart
towards this judge. He was even then about to die for him, and to bear the
guilt of the very sin He so pitilessly exposed. But surely it was the part
of love to show Annas what he was, and to utter words of rebuke in which,
as in a mirror, his secret thoughts might be revealed. But if, in the
moment of his humiliation, Jesus could thus search and reveal a man, what
will He not do when He is no longer prisoner, but Judge? Oh those awful
eyes, which are as a flame of fire! Oh those awful words, which pierce to
the dividing asunder of the joints and marrow, and discern the thoughts
and intents of the heart! What wonder that men shall at last call on the
rocks to hide them from the wrath of the Lamb! Kiss the Son, less ye
perish from his presence, when his wrath is kindled but a little! Blessed
are they who can stand before Him without blame! Then followed one of the
grossest indignities to which our Lord was at this time subjected. On
speaking thus, one of the officers, in the spirit of that despicable
flunkeyism which will sacrifice all nobility and self-respect to curry the
favour of a superior, smote our Lord with a rod, saying, "Answerest Thou
the high priest so?" When afterwards they came around Him to mock and
smite, He answered nothing; but when this first stroke was inflicted the
Master said quietly, "If I have spoken what is false or unbecoming, prove
that I have done so; but if you cannot, why do you strike Me? No one has
the right to take the law into his own hands, much less a servant of the
Court." It is impossible not to recall the mighty utterances against the
resistance of wrong, spoken from the Mount, in the Messiah's manifesto :
"I say unto you that ye resist not evil; but whosoever shall smite thee on
thy right cheek, turn to him the other also." Clearly our Lord did not
literally do so in this instance, because He saw an opportunity of
revealing to this man his true condition, and of bringing him to a better
mind. Our bearing of wrong must always be determined by the state of mind
of those who ill-use us. In the case of some we may best arrest them by
the dignity of an unutterable patience, which will bear to the utmost
without retaliation--this is to turn the other cheek. In the case of
others we may best serve them by leading them calmly and quietly to take
the true measure of their crime. In all cases our prime consideration
should be, not what we may be suffering, nor the utter injustice which is
meted out to us; but how best to save the evil-doer, who is injuring his
own soul more fatally than he can possibly injure us, and who is sowing
seeds of harvest of incredible torture to his own conscience, in the long
future which lies behind the veil of sense. If only we could drink, into
the pure love of Jesus, and view all wrong and wrong-doers, not in the
light of our personal interest, but of their awful condition and certain
penalty; if only we could grieve over the infinite horror of a warped and
devil-possessed soul, drifting like a ship on fire before the breeze,
straight to the rocks; if only we could see the wrong done to our Father
God and his sorrow, we should understand Chrysostom's beautiful comment on
this scene: "Think on Him who said these words; on him to whom they were
said; and on the reason why they were said: and, with Divine power, they
will cast down all wrath that may arise within thy soul." |
|
7 HOW IT
FARED WITH PETER
"Peter stood at the door without. Then went out that other disciple, which
was known unto the high priest, and spake unto her that kept the door, and
brought in Peter."--John 18:16.
REMEMBER that this very circumstantial account was given by one who was an
eye-witness of the whole scene; and who, withal, was then and in after
years the warm friend and companion of Peter. But his love did not lead
him to conceal his brother's sins. Peter himself would not have wished him
to do so, because where sin had abounded, grace had had the greater
opportunity to super-abound.
At the moment of the Lord's arrest, all the disciples forsook Him and
fled. "The Shepherd was smitten and the flock scattered." Two of them,
however, speedily recovered their self-possession, and followed at a
distance, eager to see what would befall. When the procession reached the
palace gate John seems to have entered with the rest of the crowd, and the
ponderous massive doors closed behind him. On looking round for Peter he
missed him, and concluding that he had been shut out and was still
standing without, he went to the maid that kept the wicket-gate, opening
in the main entrance doors for the admission of individuals, and asked her
to admit his friend. She recognised him as being well known to the high
priest, and readily assented to his request.
A fire of wood had been hastily lighted in the open courtyard, and cast
its rays on the chilly April night; so that whilst Jesus was being
examined by Annas the men who had taken part in the night adventure were
grouped around the fire, discussing the exciting incident, with its moment
of panic, the case of the arrest, the hurt and healing of the ear of
Malchus, the seizure of the rich Eastern dress from the young man whom
they had encountered on their homeward march. Peter did not wish to be
recognized, and thought that the best way of preserving his incognito was
to put on a bold face and take his place among the rest as though he, too,
had been one of the capturing band, and had as much right to be there as
any other of that mixed company. So he stood with them, and warmed
himself.
Meanwhile, the doorkeeper, leaving her post, came to the fire, and in its
kindling ray her eye fell upon Peter's face. She was surprised to see him
there, feigning to be one of themselves. If, like John, he had gone
quietly into some recess of the court, and waited unobtrusively in the
shadow, she could have said nothing. In her kind-heartedness she would
have respected them both; for she knew that they sympathized with the
arrested Nazarene. But to find him there talking and acting as though he
had no personal interest in the matter was so unseemly and unfit that she
was provoked to expose him. She looked at him earnestly--as another
evangelist tells us--to be quite sure that she was not mistaken; and
feeling quite certain in her identification, said abruptly, "Art thou not
one of this man's disciples?"
Peter was taken off his guard. If he had been arrested, and taken for
trial, he would no doubt have played the hero--he had braced himself up
for that; but he had not expected that the supreme trial of his life could
come in the question of a servant-maid. It is so often thus. We lock and
bolt the main door, and the thief breaks in at a tiny window which we had
not thought of. We would burn at the stake; but in an hour of social
intercourse with our friends, or a trivial business transaction, we say
the word which fills our life with regret. Confused at the sudden pause in
the conversation, and the turning of all eyes towards himself, Peter's
first impulse was to allay suspicion, and he said bluntly, "I am not."
Such was his first denial.
After this, as Matthew and Mark tell us, he went out into the outer porch
or gateway, perhaps to avoid the glare of the light and the scrutiny of
those prying eyes. He remembered afterwards that, at the same moment, a
cock was heralding the dawn--the dawn of the blackest, saddest day that
ever broke upon Jerusalem, or the world. But its warning notes were just
then lost on him; for there another maid, speaking to some male
acquaintances, pointed him out as one of the Nazarene's friends. "This man
also was with Jesus the Nazarene." Probably no harm was meant; but the
words alarmed Peter greatly, and he denied, as Matthew says, with an oath,
"I know not the man." This was the second denial.
An hour passed; Peter, as we learn from the twenty-fifth verse, was again
at the fire, and it was hardly possible for him to talk in a large company
without unconsciously, and by force of character, coming to the front and
taking the lead. His perturbed spirit was perhaps the more vehement to
drown conscience. But now he is challenged by many at once. They say unto
him, "Art not thou also one of his disciples?" And another saith, "Of a
truth, thou wast with Him"; and another, a kinsman to Malchus, and
therefore specially likely to remember his relative's assailant, saith,
"Did I not see thee in the garden with Him?" Beset and badgered thus,
Peter begins to curse and to swear, saying, "I know not the man of whom ye
speak." When men lose their temper, they drop naturally into their native
speech; and so, as Peter's fear and passion vented themselves in the
guttural patois of Galilee, he gave a final clue to his identification.
"Thou art a Galilean : thy speech betrayeth thee." And again he denied
with an oath, "I know not the man." This was his third denial. And
immediately the cock crew.
It may have happened that, at this moment, Jesus was passing from Annas to
Caiaphas, and cast on Peter that marvellous look of mingled sorrow and
pity, of suffering more for his sake than his own, and of tender allusion
to the scene and words of the previous evening, which broke Peter's heart,
and sent him forth to weep bitterly.
The light was breaking over the hills of Moab, flushing with roseate hues
the marble pinnacles of the Temple, whilst the city and surrounding
valleys were still shrouded in the grey gloom, as Peter went forth alone
from the high priest's palace. Only those whose last words to the beloved
dead were rude and thoughtless--not expecting that there would be no
opportunity to unsay them and ask forgiveness, but that, ere they met
again, death would have sealed in silence the only lips that could speak
words of relief and peace--can realise just what Peter felt. Did he know
Him? Of course he did, and ever since that memorable hour, when Andrew
first brought him into his presence, he had been growing to a more perfect
knowledge. Did he love Him? Of course he did; and Jesus, who knew all
things, knew it too. But why had he acted thus? Ah, the reasons were not
far to seek. He had boasted of his superiority to all his brethren; had
relied on his own braggart resolutions; had counted himself strong because
he could speak strongly and loudly when danger was not near; had thought
that he could cope with Satan, though arrayed in no stronger armour than
that which his red-hot impulse forged. He thought his resolutions wheat
and his Master's cautions light as chaff; he had to learn his weakness and
see his confidence winnowed away as clouds of chaff while Satan sifted
him.
The resolutions of the evening are not strong enough to carry us
victoriously through the morning conflict. We must learn to watch and
pray, to lie low in humility and self-distrust, and to be strong in the
grace which awaits all tempted ones in God.
And where could Peter go to weep his bitter tears but to Gethsemane! He
would surely seek out the spot where his Master's form was still outlined
in the crushed grass, and his tears would fall where the bloody sweat had
fallen but a few hours before. But how different the cause of sorrow! The
anguish of the blessed Lord had none of the ingredients that filled the
cup of Peter to the brim! And all the while the memory of that sorrow, of
those broken cries, of that coming and going for sympathy, of those
remonstrances against his senseless sleep, and of that last tender,
yearning, pitiful look of love, came back on him to arouse successive
surges of grief. Contrast Christ's love with your ingratitude, Christ's
constancy with your fickle devotion, Christ's meekness to take the yoke of
his Father's will, and your unwillingness to bear his cross of shame--and
ask if you, too, have no cause for tears like those that Peter shed.
It is remarkable that Peter should have fallen here. His open, ingenuous
nature was not given to lying, his impetuous character was not prone to
cowardice. Accustomed from boyhood to meet death in the wrestle with
nature for daily sustenance, he was not subject to the apprehensions of a
nervous dread. None of his fellow-disciples would have expected the
rock-man to show that he was clay or sand after all. But this was
permitted that he and we might learn that our noblest natural qualities as
much need to be dealt with by the grace of God as our vices and defects.
Many a fortress has been taken from a side which was deemed impregnable.
No one expected that Wolfe would assail Quebec from the Heights of
Abraham.
How often we have fallen into the same trap! We have, perhaps, been thrown
into a company where it was fashionable to sneer at evangelical religion,
and we have held our peace; where the ready sneer was passed on those who
dared still to believe in miracle and inspiration, and we have been
silent; where condemnation has been freely passed on some man of God whom
we owned as friend, and knew to be innocent, and we have not tried to
vindicate him; where some great religious movement in which we were
interested was being discussed and condemned, whilst we have coolly joined
in the conversation as if we had not made up our minds, or were totally
indifferent. We have been unwilling to be unpopular, to stand alone, to
bear the brunt of opposition, to seem eccentric and peculiar. Let those
who are without sin cast their stones at Peter; but the most of us will
take our place beside him, and realise that we, too, have given grief to
Christ, and grave cause to his enemies to blaspheme.
But, be it remembered, the true quality of the soul is shown, not in the
way in which it yields to temptation in some moment of weakness and
unpreparedness, but in the way in which it repents afterwards. Do we weep,
not for the penalty we dread, but because we have sinned against Christ?
Are we broken down before Him, waiting till He shall restore? Do we dare
still to believe in his forgiving and renewing grace? Then this is a godly
repentance, which needs not to be repented of. These are tears which his
love shall transform to pearls. How different this to the attitude of a
Judas! Each fell; but in their demeanour afterwards the one was shown to
be gold, silver, precious stones; the other wood, hay, and stubble.
How may we be kept from falling again?
(1) Let us not sleep through the precious moments which Heaven affords
before each hour of trial; but use them for putting on the whole armour of
God, that we may be able to stand in the evil day.
(2) Let us not cast ourselves needlessly into situations where our most
cherished convictions are likely to be assailed by wanton men; though if
God should lead us there we need not fear, for it will be given us in the
same hour what to answer. Take care of warming yourself at the world's
fire.
(3) Let us keep within the environing presence of our Lord. It is always
right to do right; always safe; always blessed. Satan can only hurt us
when he allures us out of that safe hiding-place. Never forsake the things
which are pure, and lovely, and of good report. You, in Jesus, shall yet
overcome the world if you refuse to allow the world to come between Him
and you. |
|
8 THE
TRIAL BEFORE CAIAPHAS
"Annas had sent Him bound unto Caiaphas the high priest." John 18:24.
IT WAS as yet but two or three o'clock in the morning. Jerusalem was still
asleep, and well it was for the foes of Jesus that no suspicion of what
was on foot had breathed into the minds of the crowds of pilgrims; for,
had the Galileans only known what was being done to their favourite
prophet, they would have risen, and the plot must have miscarried before
Jesus was handed over to the Romans. But, as the Lord said, "It was their
hour and the power of darkness." The darkest hour before the dawn!
When Annas had completed his preliminary inquiry he gave orders that He
should again be bound with the thongs of which He had been relieved, and
led to that part of the palace specially used by Caiaphas, who was high
priest, but a mere puppet in the hands of the wily Annas. By this time the
leading Pharisees, Sadducees, and priests had been got together, summoned
by special messengers; and though the formal meeting of the Council was
probably not held till a little later (compare Matt. 26:57 with 37:1-2),
the trial was really conducted at that untimely hour, and the evidence
procured on which final action was taken.
They awaited the prisoner in one of the larger halls of the palace,
sitting in Oriental fashion on cushions and pillows, in a half-circle,
with turbaned heads, crossed legs, and bare feet; the high priest in the
centre, the others on either side, according to age.
All the rules of justice were violated. The judge was chief inquisitor;
witnesses against the prisoner were alone summoned; and the Court set
itself from the first to get evidence to put the accused to death.
Ever since Jesus had commenced his ministry it had been certain that He
would have to face some such tribunal as this. His soul was aflame for
Righteousness and Truth; it was inevitable that He should come into
conflict with these representatives of a traditional and external
religiousness, which consisted in a number of formal rules and rites from
which the life had long since fled.
This Gospel specially narrates the progress of the quarrel in the holy
city. As far back as John 2:18 we are told that there had been an
altercation on the Lord's right to cleanse the Temple.
John 4:1, 2, 3.--He left Judaea because of the irritation of the Pharisees
at the numerous baptisms which were taking place under his ministry.
John 5:18.--He was only at the beginning of the second year of his
ministry, and had just healed the impotent man at the pool of Bethesda;
and we find the Jews consulting how they might kill Him, and He was
compelled again to retire from Judaea.
John 7:19.--Such was the spirit of vindictiveness excited against our Lord
that when twelve months afterwards He came to Jerusalem at the Feast of
Tabernacles, one of his first words was, "Why go ye about to kill Me?" The
people were well acquainted with the designs of the rulers (John 18:25,
26); and ultimately officers were sent to arrest Him (John 18:30, 31, 32).
John 8:59.--They were so exasperated with his words that they took up
stones to stone Him.
John 9:34.--They excommunicated the blind man because their hated foe had
cured him, and he in his favour had dared to protest.
John 10:31.--The Jews (and the Apostle always uses that word of the
Sanhedrim and their allies) took up stones to cast at Him; and in John
18:39 we read that they sought again to take Him; but He escaped out of
their hand to Perea, where He remained until the message of the sisters
called Him from his retreat.
John 11:47.--The raising of Lazarus produced such an effect that a special
Council was called to consider what should be done, with the result that
from that day they took counsel to put Him to death.
John 12:10.--Their malignity was so great that they consulted whether they
should not put Lazarus to death also; because by reason of him many of the
Jews went away and believed in Jesus.
It was all this that made them fall in so eagerly with the proposal of
Judas that he should betray Him unto them.
Now at last they had Him in their power, and their object was to convict
Him of some crime which would justify the infliction of the severest
sentence of the law. To preserve the appearance of justice, witnesses were
called to testify to some action or speech which would involve blasphemy
against their law, and, if possible, against the Roman law as well; and it
was necessary that two of them should agree in some specific charge. The
chief priests, and elders, and all the Council, Matthew tells us, sought
for witness against Jesus to put Him to death. They brought forward many,
but either their charges did not reach the required degree of criminality,
or the clumsy witnesses, brought hastily forward, undrilled beforehand,
broke down so grossly in their story that for shame's sake they had to be
dismissed.
At last two witnesses appeared who seemed likely to agree on a very
momentous charge. They said they had heard Him utter, more than two years
ago, words which seemed to threaten the very existence of the Temple. But,
when more closely questioned, their witness also broke down utterly. It
seemed as though Jesus was not to die, except on his own testimony to his
own supreme claims. All lesser counts failed.
All this time, as witness after witness was brought in, our Lord
maintained an unbroken silence. He seemed as though He heard not, but was
absorbed in some other scenes from those transpiring around. What need was
there for Him to interpose, when all the charges proved abortive? He was,
moreover, waiting till the Father gave Him the signal to open his lips.
At last Caiaphas could restrain his impatience no longer; he sprang to his
feet, and with unconcealed fury fixed his eyes on Jesus and said: "Answerest
Thou nothing? Hast Thou nothing to say, no question to put, no explanation
to offer as to what these witnesses say?" Jesus quietly returned the look,
but held his peace. There are times when it is treason to hold our peace;
when God demands of us to raise our voice and cry like a trumpet. But when
it is clear that high-handed wrong is bent on securing the condemnation of
the innocent, and that the case is prejudged, it is the highest wisdom to
be as a lamb dumb before its shearers, and not open the mouth.
There was a last alternative. Caiaphas might put Jesus on his oath, and
extort from his own lips the charge on which to condemn Him; but he was
evidently reluctant to do it, and only availed himself of this process as
a last resource. It was well known to this astute and cunning priest that
Jesus on more than one occasion had claimed, not only to be the
long-expected Messiah, but to stand to God in the unique relationship of
Son. Nearly two years before, He had called God his own Father, making
Himself equal with God (John 5:18); and again, comparatively recently, at
the Feast of Dedication, He had claimed that He and the Father were one;
in consequence of which the bystanders threatened to take his life because
that, being a man, He made Himself God (John 10:31, 32, 33). Gathering,
therefore, the two claims in one, and in the most solemn form, putting
Jesus on his oath, the high priest said unto Him, "I adjure Thee by the
Living God, that Thou tell us whether Thou be the Christ, the Son of the
Blessed?" (Matt. 26:63; Mark 14:61). There was no need for further
hesitation. Charged in this way, in the highest court of his nation, and
by the representative of his people, He could not hold his peace without
inconsistency with the whole tenor of his life and teaching. John,
representing his disciples and friends, must be assured that his Master
did not vacillate by a hairbreadth at that supreme moment. Those high
officials must understand, beyond the smallest possibility of doubt, that
if they put Him to death He would die on the supreme count of his
Messianic and Divine claims; and, therefore, amid the breathless silence
of the Court, without a falter in the calm, clear voice, Jesus said, "I
AM." The Father that sent Him was with Him; He had not left Him in that
awful moment alone: and it was a great pleasure to the Saviour to be able
publicly to avow the relationship, which was shedding its radiance through
his soul. Then, with evident allusion to the sublime vision of Daniel, He
added, "Ye shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of power,
and coming with the clouds of heaven." Though Son of God, He was not less
the Son of Man; and though one with the Father before the worlds were
made, was yet prepared to exercise the functions of the expected Prince of
the House of Israel. This is the force of nevertheless in Matt. 26:64 I am
the Son of God: nevertheless, ye shall see the Son of Man sitting on the
right hand of power.
The words were very grateful to the ears of Caiaphas and his confederates,
as they afforded ground for the double charge they needed. For a man to
claim to be Son of God would make him guilty of blasphemy, and he must be
put to death according to Jewish law; whilst if there was a prospect of
his setting up a kingdom, the Romans' suspicions would at once be aroused.
But in their glee at having entrapped their victim they must not forget to
show a decorous horror of his crime. In well-assumed dismay the high
priest rent his clothes, saying, "He hath spoken blasphemy: what further
need have we of witnesses? Behold, now ye have heard the blasphemy." And
then came the decisive question which the judge was wont to put to his
co-assessors, "What think ye? And they all condemned Him to be guilty of
death."
Then ensued a brief interval, until the early formal session of the
Sanhedrim could be held : and during this recess the disgraceful scenes
were repeated which had already taken place in the hall of Annas. Luke
tells us that the men that held Jesus mocked Him, beat Him, and asked Him
to prophesy who it was that smote Him. Matthew adds that they spat in his
face. But Mark lets in still more light on the horror of the scene, when
he appears to distinguish between some who began to spit on Him, and to
cover his face, and the officers who received Him with blows of their
hands. And the expression some occurs so immediately after the record of
their condemning Him, that the suggestion seems irresistible that several
of these reverend dignitaries did not hesitate to disgrace their grey
hairs in personally insulting the meek and holy Sufferer; venting their
spleen on one who gave no show of retaliation, though one word from those
pale compressed lips would have laid them low in death, or withdrawn the
veil of eternity, behind which legions of angels were waiting impatient to
burst upon the impious scene. But do not condemn them as though they were
sinners beyond all others; remember that we have all the same evil human
heart.
At last the morning broke, and as soon as it was day the assembly of the
elders of the people was gathered together, both chief priests and
scribes; and they led Jesus away into their Council (Luke 22:66). This
scene had already been so well rehearsed that it probably did not take
many minutes to run through the necessary stages, according to the precise
formulae of Jewish procedure. The method that had already proved so
valuable was quickly repeated. Questioning Him first as to His Messiahship,
Caiaphas, as spokesman to the rest, said formally, "If Thou art Christ,
tell us."
It was a sorry figure that stood before them. Dishevelled and in disarray,
with disordered garments, the spittle still hanging about his face, and
the marks of the awful storm and mental anguish stamped on every feature,
the innate dignity and glory of Jesus shone out in his every movement, and
notably in his majestic answer, "What do you ask Me? You have no real
desire to know! If I tell you, ye are in no mood to believe! And if I ask
you your warrant for refusing to believe, if I argue with you, if I adduce
Scripture to support my claims, ye will not answer; but though I read the
motive of your inquiry, I will give you all the evidence you desire. From
henceforth shall the Son of Man be seated at the right hand of God."
As to the other charge, involving his divine nature, the admission of
which involved the crime of blasphemy, they were too eager to wait for
Caiaphas; but with swollen faces, excited gestures, and loud cries, rising
from their seats, and gesticulating with the fury of religious frenzy,
they all said, "Art Thou then the Son of God?" And He said unto them,
solemnly and emphatically, "Ye say that which I am."
Then they turned to one another and said, "What further need have we of
witness? for we have heard from his own mouth." The inquiry was at an end
so far as Jesus was concerned. But they held a further Council against
Him, how to construct the indictment which would compel Pilate to inflict
death; for the execution of the sentence of death was kept resolutely by
the Roman Procurator in his own hands.
Finally, as soon as they dared disturb him, they led Jesus from Caiaphas
into the Praetorium, the place of the Roman governor, who, in accordance
with his custom, had come up from his usual residence at Caesarea to the
Jewish capital, partly to keep order amid the vast crowds that gathered
there at the feast, seething with religious fanaticism, and partly to try
the cases which awaited his decision. The Jewish authorities anticipated
no great difficulty in securing from him the necessary ratification of the
death-sentence. It surely would not matter to him to add another to the
long tale of robbers and revolutionaries which were awaiting the cross;
the more especially as they were able to prefer a charge of treason
against the Roman power substantiated by the prisoner's own admissions
made recently in their presence.
It is an awful spectacle, and one over which we would fain draw a veil;
but let us dare to stay to watch the evolution of the diabolical plot to
the end. This, at least, will become manifest--that Jesus died, because He
claimed to be the Son of God, in the unique sense of oneness with the
Father; that made Him equal with God, and constituted blasphemy in the eye
of the Jewish law. And He who has taught the world Truth could neither
have been a deceiver, nor deceived, in this high claim. |
|
9 JUDAS,
WHICH BETRAYED HIM"
"Judas, which betrayed Him."--John 18:2.
ON THE Wednesday evening before our Lord died, He supped with his
disciples in Bethany at the house of Simon. Lazarus was there, and his
sisters--Martha, who served, and Mary, who anointed Him beforehand for his
burying. The Master's reception of this act of love, and his rebuke of the
parsimony which sought to check all such manifestations of devotion,
exasperated Judas beyond all bounds; so, after supper, when Jesus and the
rest had retired to their humble lodgment, he crossed the intervening
valleys and returned by the moonlight to Jerusalem.
At that untimely hour the Sanhedrim may have been still in session,
plotting to destroy Jesus. At any rate, the chief priests and captains
were quickly summoned. Judas may have been in communication with some of
them before; but, in any case, he met with a glad welcome. They were glad,
and covenanted to give him money.
In the word, communed with them, used by the evangelist Luke, it is
suggested that there was a certain amount of bargaining and haggling
before the sum was fixed. Perhaps he wanted more, and they offered him
less, and at last he was induced to take less than he had hoped, but more
than they had offered; and the price of betrayal was fixed at thirty
pieces of silver, about £8, the price of a slave. From that moment he
sought opportunity to betray Him unto them.
At the Passover Supper provided on the next day by Peter and John in the
upper room, Judas must have reclined on the Lord's left, and John upon his
right, so that the beloved disciple could lean back his head on the bosom
of his Friend. When all were settled, Jesus exclaimed, with a sigh of
innermost satisfaction, "With desire I have desired to eat this Passover
with you before I suffer"; and as He uttered the words, Judas must have
felt a thrill passing through his nature, as he realised more clearly than
any around that table what was approaching. Evidently, then, the Master
had guessed what was being prepared for Him! Did He also know the share
that he had in preparing it? In any case, it was clear that, so far from
resisting, He was prepared to suffer. Apparently, He would not take the
opportunity of asserting his claims; but would allow events to take their
course, yielding Himself to the will of his foes!
When He had given thanks, the Lord passed round the first cup; then
followed the washing of the disciples' feet, in the midst of which He
looked sorrowfully towards Judas, exclaiming, "Ye are clean, but not all";
for He knew from the first who would betray Him. It was with a strange
blending of awe and wonder that the little group saw the dark cloud of
anguish gather and rest on the beloved face when, on resuming his place,
He was troubled in the spirit, and testified, and said, "Verily, verily, I
say unto you, that one of you shall betray Me." The disciples looked at
one another, doubting of whom He spoke, and Peter beckoned to John to ask.
But Judas knew. And when He went on to say, "The Son of Man goeth even as
it is written of him; but woe unto that man through whom the Son of Man is
betrayed! good were it for that man if he had not been born"--again Judas'
heart smote him. It may be that he asked himself whether he might not even
now draw back.
For three years he had played his part so well that, in spite of his
constant pilfering from the bag which held the slender resources of the
little band, no one suspected him. His fellow-disciples might contend for
the first places at the table, but all felt that Judas, at any-rate, had a
prescriptive right to sit near Jesus. All round, in sorrowful tones, the
question passed, "Lord, is it I?" Each, conscious of the unfathomed evil
of his own nature, thought himself more likely to be the traitor than that
the admirable Judas should do the deed. It was terrible to know that the
Shepherd should be smitten, and the flock scattered; but more, that the
Master would be betrayed by the inner circle of his friends! But there
seemed no reason for challenging his announcement, backed as it was by a
quotation from a familiar Psalm, "He that dippeth his band with Me in the
dish, the same shall betray Me." From these words also it was evident that
the traitor must be one of two or three; for only these could reach the
common dish in which Jesus dipped his food.
It became, therefore, more and more clear to Judas, that the Master knew
perfectly well all that had transpired, and he said to himself, "If He
knows so much, it is almost certain that He knows all." Therefore, partly
to disarm any suspicions that might be suggested to the others if he did
not take up their question, partly because he felt that probably there was
nothing to be gained by maintaining his disguise before Jesus, and being
withal feverishly anxious to know how much of his plan was discovered, he
asked, adopting the colder title Rabbi, rather than that of Lord, as
employed by the others, "Rabbi, is it I?" Probably the question was asked
under his breath, and that Jesus replied in the same tone, "Thou hast
said."
Immediately the thoughts of Judas sprang back to the foot-washing, and all
the other marks of extraordinary tenderness with which Jesus had treated
him. At the time he had thought, "He would not act like this if He knew
all." Now, however, he realised that Jesus had acted in the full knowledge
of all that had passed, and was passing in his heart. It must have struck
him as extraordinary that the Master should continue to treat him thus
when He had read the whole dark secret. Why did He not unmask and expose
him? Why not banish him from his company? Why count him still on speaking
terms? Not till afterwards was he aware of Jesus' motive, nor did he
detect the loving purpose which was laying siege to his stony heart as
though to turn him from his evil purpose before it was too late.
Once more the Lord made an effort to prove to him that though He knew all
He loved him still---even to the end. It was the Jewish custom for one to
dip a morsel in the common dish and pass it to another in token of special
affection, so when He had dipped the sop, Jesus took and gave it to Judas,
the son of Simon. He had previously answered John's whispered question,
"Lord, who is it?" which had been suggested by a sign from Peter, by
saying, "He it is to whom I shall give a sop when I have dipped it." But
He did not give the token of love merely as a sign of John and Peter, but
because He desired to assure Judas that, notwithstanding His perfect
knowledge, His heart was full of tender affection.
When the sun strikes on a foetid pond, its rays, beneath which all
creation rejoices, bring out the repulsive odours that otherwise had slept
undiscovered; so the love of God is ever a savour of life unto life or of
death unto death, and the very fervour of Christ's love seems to have
driven Judas almost to madness. Shutting his heart against the Saviour, he
opened it to Satan, who was waiting his opportunity. "After the sop, then
Satan entered into him." Instantly the Master saw the change, and knew
that He could do nothing more to save his disciple from the pit which he
had digged for himself. Nothing could be gained by further delay. Jesus
therefore said unto him, "That thou doest, do quickly."
So carefully had the Lord concealed his knowledge of Judas' real character
that none of those who sat at table guessed the real significance and
purport of his words. For some thought, because Judas had the bag, that
Jesus said unto him, "Buy what things we have need of for the feast"; or
that he should give something to the poor. Only John, and perhaps Peter,
bad the slightest suspicion of his possible errand. The sacred narrative
adds significantly, "He then having received the sop, went out
straightway, and it was night"; as though the black pall of darkness were
a befitting symbol of the blackness of darkness that was enveloping his
soul--a night broken only by one star, when Jesus once more in the garden
sought to arrest him with the words, "Friend, to what a deed thou art
come! Betrayest thou the Son of Man with a kiss?" But that lone star was
soon obscured. The cloud-wreath hastened to conceal it. Headlong and
precipitate over every obstacle, he rushed to his doom, until his career
was consummated in the despairing act which the evangelist so solemnly
records.
The specified fee was no doubt paid to Judas, on his delivery of Jesus
into the hands of the high priest. As soon as the great doors closed
behind the arresting band, Judas went to some inner pay-office, claimed
his money, and then waited in the shadow to see what befell. Perhaps he
met John; and if so, avoided him. Perhaps he heard Peter deny the Lord
with oaths, and congratulated himself that there was not much to choose
between them. But for the most part his mind was absorbed in what was
transpiring. He beheld the shameful injustice and inhumanity of the trial.
Though he had kissed his Master's face, his soul winced from the blows and
spittle that befell it. Perhaps he had entertained some lingering hope and
expectation that when the worst came to the worst the Master would use on
his own behalf the power He had so often used for others. But if that
thought had lodged in his mind, the dream was terribly dissipated. "He saw
that He was condemned."
Then the full significance of his sin burst upon him. The veil fell from
his eyes, and he stood face to face with his crime in all its naked
horror--his ingratitude, his treachery, his petty pilfering, his
resistance of a love which the strong waters of death could not
extinguish. And the money scorched his hand. A wild and haggard man, he
made his way into the presence of the chief priests and scribes, as they
were congratulating themselves on the success of their plot. There was
despair on his face, a piercing note in his voice, anguish in his soul;
the flames of hell were already consuming him, the thirst of the
bottomless pit already parching his lips; his hand convulsively clutched
the thirty pieces of silver.
"I have sinned," he cried. "I have sinned. He whom you have condemned is
innocent; take back your money, only let Him go free; and oh, relieve me,
ye priests, accustomed to deal with burdened hearts, relieve me of this
intolerable pain."
But they said, with a gleam as of cold steel, "What is that to us? That is
your business. You made your bargain, and you must stand to it: see thou
to it."
He knew that it was useless to parley with them. That icy sarcasm, that
haughty indifference, told him how man must ever regard his miserable act.
He had already refused the love of God, and dared not expect anything more
from it. He foresaw how coming ages would spurn and abhor him. There
seemed, therefore, nothing better than to leap into the awful abyss of
suicide. It could bring nothing worse than he was suffering. Oh, if he had
only dared to believe in the love of God, and had fallen even then at the
feet of Jesus, he might have become a pillar in his temple, and an apostle
of the Church. But he dared not think that there could be mercy for such
as he was. He passes out into the morning ah', the most wretched of men,
shrinks away into some lonely spot, puts a rope around his neck, and dies.
We have been accustomed to think of Judas as one whose crime has put him
far in front of all others in the enormity of his guilt. Dante draws an
awful picture of him as alone even in hell, shunned by all other sinners,
as Turkish prisoners will shun Christians, though sharing the same cell.
But let us remember that he did not come to such a pitch of evil at a
single bound. There was a time, no doubt, when, amid the cornfields,
vineyards, and pastoral villages of his native Kerioth, he was regarded as
a promising youth, quick at figures, the comfort of his parents, the pride
of his instructors, the leader of his comrades.
During the early years of his manhood, Jesus came through that court
country on a preaching tour, and there must have been a wonderful
fascination in Him for young men, so many of whom left their friends and
callings to join and follow Him. Judas felt the charm and joined himself
to the Lord; perhaps Jesus even called him. At that time his life must
have been fair, or the Master would never have committed Himself to him.
He was practical, prompt, and businesslike, the very man to keep the bag.
But the continual handling of the money at last awoke within him an
appetite of the presence of which he had not been previously aware. He did
not banish it, but dwelt on it, allowing it to lodge and expand within
him, till, like a fungus in congenial soil, it ate out his heart and
absorbed into itself all the qualities of his nobler nature, transmuting
them into rank and noisome products. All love for Christ, all care for the
poor, all thought of his fellow-disciples, were quenched before that
remorseless passion; and at last he began to pilfer from those scant
treasures, which were now and again replenished by those that loved to
minister to the Master's comfort. At first, he must have been stung by
keen remorse; but each time he sinned his conscience became more seared,
until he finally reached the point when he could sell his Master for a
bagatelle, and betray Him with a kiss.
Alas! Judas is not the only man of whom these particulars have been true.
Change the name and you have an exact description of too many. Many a fair
craft has come within the reach of the circling eddies of the same boiling
whirlpool, and, after a struggle, has succumbed. The young man hails from
his native village home, earnest and ingenuous. At first he stands firm
against the worldly influences around; but gradually he becomes careless
in his watch, and as money flows in he realises the fascination of the
idea of being a wealthy man. He becomes increasingly absorbed, until he
begins to drift towards a goal from which in other days he would have
shrunk in horror. If any reader of these words is conscious of such a
passion beginning to lay hold of him, let him beware, lest, like Judas, he
be lost in the divers hurtful lusts which drown men in perdition.
And if already you have been betrayed into sins which would bear
comparison with that of Judas, do not despair--true, you have sinned
against light and love, the eager, tender pleadings of God's love; but do
not give up hope. Cast yourself on a love which wants to abound over sin,
and glories in being able to save to the uttermost. |
|
10 THE
FIRST TRIAL BEFORE PILATE
"Then led they Jesus from Caiaphas unto the hall of judgment: and it was
early; and they themselves went not into the judgment hall, lest they
should be defiled; but that they might eat the passover." John 18:28.
THERE is no doubt that had Pilate been absent from Jerusalem at the time
of our Lord's trial before the Sanhedrim, they would have rushed Him to
death, as afterwards Stephen, and have risked the anger of the governor.
But they dared not attempt such a thing beneath the eyes of the dreaded
Roman eagles. They must needs obtain Pilate's countersign to their
death-sentence, and, indeed, consign their victim to him for execution.
The Lord was to die, not the Jewish death by stoning, but the terrible
Roman death of crucifixion.
The day then breaking was that before the Passover. If the order for
execution were not obtained that morning, the case could not come on for
seven days, and it would have been highly impolitic, from their point of
view, to keep Jesus so long in bonds. The national sentiment might have
awoke and refused to sanction their treachery. For the same reason it was
necessary to carry the sentence into effect with as little delay as
possible, or the whole plot might miscarry. Then led they Jesus from
Caiaphas to the official residence of Pilate, which had been the palace of
the magnificent Herod--and it was early.
In the palace there was a hall where trials were usually conducted; but
the Jewish dignitaries who had not scrupled shamelessly to condemn Jesus
were too scrupulous to enter the house of a Gentile on the eve of the
feast, for fear there might be a single grain of leaven there, and the
mere suspicion of such a thing would have disqualified them from
participating in the feast. Remember that these men had just broken every
principle of justice in their treatment of Jesus, and now they palter over
minute points of Rabbinical casuistry. So Philip of Spain abetted the
massacres of Alva, but rigorously performed all the rites of the Church;
and the Italian bandit will carefully honour priest, and host, and church.
How well our Lord's sharp sword cut to the dividing of soul and spirit, in
such cases as these: "Ye pay tithe of mint, and cummin, and anise, and
have omitted the weightier matters of the law." It is an evil day when
religion and morality are divorced.
Pilate knew too well the character of the men with whom he had to do, to
attempt to force their scruples, and went out to them; so that for most of
the time his intercourse with Jesus was apart from their interference and
scrutiny. Without much interchange of formalities, the governor asked,
"What accusation bring ye against this man?"
It was not a little disappointing to their pride to be obliged to adduce
and substantiate capital charges against Jesus, so they replied in general
terms, and with the air of injured innocence, "If He were not a
malefactor, we would not have delivered Him unto thee." It was as though
they said, "There is no need for thee to enter into the details of this
case; we have thoroughly investigated it, and are satisfied with the
conclusive evidence of our prisoner's guilt; you may be sure that men like
ourselves would never come to thee at such an hour, on such an errand,
unless there were ample grounds for it."
But Pilate was in no mood to be talked with thus. He saw their eagerness
to ward off inquiry, and this was quite enough to arouse his proud spirit
to thwart and disappoint them. He knew well enough that they wanted him to
pronounce the death-sentence; but he pretended not to, and said, in
effect, "If your judgment, and yours only, is to settle the case, take ye
Him and judge Him according to your law, inflicting such penalty as it
directs."
The Jewish notables at once saw that they must adopt a more conciliatory
tone, or they would lose their case; they therefore explained that they
wanted a severer sentence than they had the right to inflict. "It is not
lawful," they said, "for us to put any man to death."
Pilate again asked for a statement of the crime of which Jesus was
accused.
Now mark the baseness of their reply. The only crime on which they had
condemned Jesus to death was his claim to Deity; but it would never have
done to tell Pilate that. He would simply have laughed at them. They must
find some charge which would bring Him within the range of the common law,
and be of such a nature that Pilate must take cognisance of it, and award
death. It was not easy to find ground for such a charge in the life of one
who had so studiously threaded his way through the snares they had often
laid for Him; who had bade them render Caesar's things to Caesar; and
protested that He was neither a ruler nor judge. Their only hope was to
rest their charge on his claim to be the Messiah; construing it as the
Jews were wont to do, but as Jesus never did, into a claim to an outward
and visible royalty. They said, therefore, as Luke informs us, "We found
this man perverting the nation and forbidding to give tribute to Caesar,
saying that He Himself is Christ a King."
This was quite enough to compel Pilate to institute further inquiry. There
were thousands of Jews who questioned Caesar's right to tax them, and were
willing to revolt under the lead of any man who showed himself capable. It
was certainly suspicious that such a charge should be made by men who
themselves abhorred the yoke of Rome. However, Pilate saw that he had no
alternative but to investigate the case further. He therefore went within
the palace to the inner judgment hall, summoned Jesus before him, and
said, not without a touch of sarcasm in his tones, "Art Thou the King of
the Jews?" Thou poor, worn, tear-stained outcast, forsaken by every friend
in this thy hour of need, so great a contrast to him who built these halls
and aspired to the same title--art thou a king?
He probably expected that Jesus would at once disclaim any such tide. But
instead of doing so, instead of answering directly, our Lord answered his
question by propounding another--"Sayest thou this thing of thyself, or
did others tell it thee concerning Me?" The purport of this question seems
to have been to probe Pilate's conscience, and make him aware of his own
growing consciousness that this prisoner was too royal in mien to be an
ordinary Jewish visionary. It was as though He said: "Dost thou use the
term in the common sense, or as a soul confronted by a greater than
thyself? Do you speak by hearsay or by conviction? Is it because the Jews
have so taught thee, or because thou recognisest Me as able to bring order
and peace into troubled hearts like thine?"
Whatever thoughts had instinctively made themselves felt were instantly
beaten back by his strong Roman pride. Never before had he been catechised
thus. And he answered haughtily, "Am I a Jew? Thine own nation and the
chief priests have delivered Thee unto me: what hast Thou done?"
Our Lord did not answer that question by enumerating deeds which had
filled Palestine with wonder; but contented Himself by saying that He had
committed no political offence, and had no idea of setting Himself up as
king, in the sense in which Pilate and the Jews used the word: "My kingdom
is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my
servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my
kingdom not from hence."
Never in the history of this world did the lips of man speak or his ears
listen to a more pregnant or remarkable utterance. But it has been
shamefully misunderstood. Men have misread the words, and said, See, the
religion of Jesus is quite unworldly, has nothing to do with the
institutions and arrangements of human life. It deals with the spiritual,
and not with the secular. It treats of our spirits, not our hands or
pockets. So long as we recognise Christ's authority in the Church, we may
do as we like in the home, the counting-house, the factory, and the shop.
It was in no such sense that Jesus uttered these words, and the mistake
has largely arisen through the misunderstanding of the word of as used by
our translators. It has not the force of belonging to, or being the
property of; but is the translation of a Greek preposition, meaning out
of, springing from, originating in. We might freely translate the Master's
words thus: "My kingdom does not originate from this world; it has come
down from another, to bring the principles, methods, and inspirations of
heaven to bear on all the provinces of human thought and activity." The
Son of Man claims the whole of man and all that he does as a subject of
his realm. He cannot spare one relationship of human life, one art, one
industry, one interest, one joy, one hope, from the domain of his empire.
He has a word about the weight in the pedlar's bag, the dealings of the
merchant on 'Change, the justice and injustice of wars that desolate
continents.
The one conspicuous proof of the absolutely foreign origin of this
heavenly kingdom is its refusal to employ force. Its servants do not
fight. In the garden the King had repudiated the use of force, bidding his
servant sheath his sword. Whenever you encounter a system that cannot
stand without the use of force, that appeals to the law court or bayonet,
you are sure that, whatever else it is, it is not the Kingdom of Christ.
Christ's kingdom distinctly and for ever refuses to allow its subjects to
fight. They who would surround Christianity with prestige, endow it with
wealth, and guard it with the sword, expel its divine Spirit, and leave
only its semblance dead upon the field. But if the aid which might be
deemed essential is withheld, whether of funds or force, it thrives and
spreads until the hills are covered with its goodly shadow, and its
products fill the earth with harvests of benediction. All the Gospel asks
for is freedom--freedom to do what Jesus did, in the way He did it;
freedom because of its belief that the power of truth is greater than all
the power of the Adversary. Oh for a second Pentecost! Oh for the holy
days of apostolic trust and simplicity! Oh for one of the days of the Son
of Man, who came to our world armed with no authority save that of truth,
clothed with no power but that of love.
In Pilate's next question there seems a touch of awe and respect: "Art
Thou a king then?" That moral nature which is in all men, however debased,
seemed for a moment to assert itself, and a strange spell lay on his
spirit.
With wondrous dignity our Lord immediately answered, "Thou sayest that I
am--a king." But He hastens to show that it was a kingship not based upon
material force like that of the Caesars, nor confined to one race of men:
"To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I
should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth
my voice." There is no soul of man, in any clime or age, devoted to the
truth, which does not recognise the royalty and supremacy of Jesus Christ.
There is an accent in his words which all the children of the truth
instantly recognise. The idea here given of Jesus gazing ever into the
depths of eternal truth, and bearing witness of what He saw, not in his
words alone, but in his life and death; and of the assent given to his
witness by all who have looked upon the sublime outlines of truth, is one
of those majestic conceptions which cannot be accounted for on any
hypothesis than that the speaker was divine.
When Pilate heard these words, he probably thought of the Epicureans, and
Stoics, and other philosophers, who were perpetually wrangling about the
truth, and demanding men's allegiance. "Oh," said he to himself, "here is
another enthusiast, touched with the same madness, though He does seem
nobler than many of his craft. One thing is clear, that my lord has
nothing to fear from his pretensions. He may sit as long as he likes on
his ideal throne without detriment to the empire of the Caesars." With
mingled bitterness and cynicism, he answered, "What is truth?" and,
without waiting for an answer, went out to the group of Jewish rabbis
waiting in the opening daylight, and threw them into convulsions of
excitement by saying, "I find in Him no fault at all."
They were the more urgent, saying, "He stirreth up the people, teaching
throughout all Judea, and beginning from Galilee even unto this place."
The mention of Galilee came as a gleam of light to Pilate. He was
sincerely desirous not to be an accomplice in the death of Jesus, by
falling into the plot which he had been astute enough to detect. But not
daring to take the only honourable and safe way of declaring his
innocence, and summoning a cohort of soldiers to clear the court, he
endeavoured to exculpate himself by throwing the responsibility on Herod.
He congratulated himself on the ingenuity of a plan which should relieve
him of the necessity of grieving his conscience on the one hand, or of
irritating the Jews on the other, and which would conciliate Herod, with
whom he was at this time on unfriendly terms. When he knew therefore that
He was of Herod's jurisdiction he sent Him unto Herod, who himself was at
Jerusalem in those days.
Herod was glad to see the wonderful miracle-worker of whom he had heard so
much, and hoped that He might do some wonder in his presence; and, in the
hope of extorting it, set Him at nought, and mocked Him, with his mighty
men. But the Lord remained absolutely silent in his presence, as though
the love of God could say nothing to the murderer of the Baptist, who had
not repented of his deed. Finally, therefore, disappointed and chagrined,
Herod sent Jesus back to Pilate, admitting that he had found in Him no
cause of death. |
|
11 THE
SECOND TRIAL BEFORE PILATE
"Ye have a custom, that I should release unto you one at the Passover:
will ye therefore that I release unto you the King of the Jews?" John
18:39.
PILATE must have felt mortified when he heard that Herod had sent Jesus
back to his tribunal. He had hoped that the Jewish monarch would so settle
the matter that there would be no need for him to choose between his
conscience and his fear of the Jewish leaders. But it was not to be. It
was decreed that he should pronounce the judicial sentence on our Lord,
and so on himself.
Now was the time for him to act decisively, and to say clearly that he
would be no party to the unrighteous deed to which these priests were
urging him. To have done so firmly and decisively, and before they could
further inflame popular passion, the whole matter would have come to an
end. Alas! he let the golden moment slip past him unused, and every
succeeding moment made it more impossible for him to retrieve it.
Pilate is one of the most notable instances in history of the fatal error
of preferring expediency to principle. He wished to do right, but not to
do it avowedly because it was right. He wished to do fight without seeming
to do it, or making a positive stand for it. And in consequence he was
finally entrapped into doing the very deed which he had taken the greatest
trouble to avoid. Therefore, on the plains of time he stands as a beacon
and warning; and to all who do not dare to oppose the stream of public
passion and practice with the single affirmation of inflexible adherence
to righteousness, the voice of inspiration cries aloud, "Remember Pilate!"
However promising a tortuous course may look, it will certainly end in
disaster. However discouraging a righteous one may appear, it will at last
lead out into the open. And in doing the right thing, be sure to speak out
firmly at once. It may be harder for the moment, but it will be always
easier afterwards. One brave word will put you into a position of moral
advantage, from which no power shall avail to shake or dislodge you.
Such a word, however, Pilate failed to speak; and when Jesus was again
brought before him, he began to think of some way by which he might do as
conscience prompted, without running counter to the Jewish leaders. He,
therefore, summoned around him the chief priests and rulers of the people.
The latter are particularly mentioned, as though Pilate thought that his
best method of saving Jesus would be by appealing over the heads of the
priests to the humanity of the common people. When all were again
assembled he made, as Luke tells us, a short speech to them, reiterating
his conviction of His innocence, corroborating his own opinion by Herod's,
and closing by a proposal which he hoped would meet the whole case. "I
will therefore chastise Him and release Him." Was there ever such a
compromise? A little before he had solemnly affirmed that he could find in
Him no fault at all, but if that were the case, why chastise Him? And if
He were guilty of the charges brought against Him, as chastisement might
seem to suggest, surely He should not be released. Pilate meant to do the
best. The chastisement was intended as a sop to the priests, and to win
their acquiescence to their victim's release. But it was not straight
forward, or strong, or right. And, like all compromises, it miserably
failed.
Those keen Jewish eyes saw in a moment that Pilate had left the ground of
simple justice. He had shifted from the principle on which Roman law was
generally administered, and they saw that it was only a question of
bringing sufficient pressure to bear on him, and they could make him a
tool for the accomplishment of the fell purpose on which their heart was
set. The proposal, therefore, was swept ignominiously away, and Pilate
could never regain the position he had renounced.
Pilate then resorted to another expedient for saving Jesus. It was the
custom to carry out capital sentences at feast times, which were the
occasions of great popular convocations; but it was also customary for the
governor to release any one prisoner, condemned to death, whom the
multitude, on the Passover week, might agree to name. Pilate recollected
this, and also that there was a notorious criminal awaiting execution, who
for sedition and murder had been arrested and condemned to die. It
occurred to him that, instead of asking the people generally whom they
wished him to release, he should narrow the choice and present the
alternative between Barabbas and Jesus. They would hardly fail, he
thought, to choose the release of this pale Prisoner, who was innocent of
crime, and, indeed, had lived a life notable for its benevolence.
Pilate took care to announce his proposal with the greatest effect. The
vast space before his palace was rapidly filling with excited crowds, who
guessed that something unusual was astir, and were pouring in surging
volumes into the piazza, although it was still early. That he might be the
better seen and heard he ascended a movable rostrum, or judgment-seat,
which was placed on the tessellated pavement that ran from end to end of
the palace. "Whom will ye," he asked, "that I release unto you--Barabbas,
or Jesus which is called the Christ?" And then he suggested the answer:
"Will ye that I release unto you the King of the Jews?"
At this moment, and perhaps whilst waiting for their answer, a messenger
hurried to speak to him from his wife. It must have been most unusual for
her to interfere with his judicial acts; but she had been so impressed by
a dream about her husband's connection with Jesus, the unwonted Prisoner
who stood before him, that she was impelled to urge him to have nothing to
do with Him. It was a remarkable episode, and must have made Pilate more
than ever anxious to extricate himself from his dilemma.
It was still not absolutely too late to set himself free by the resolute
expression of his will. But his temporising policy was making it immensely
difficult, and he was becoming every moment more entangled in the meshes
of the merciless priests.
He had hoped much from his last proposal, but was destined to be bitterly
disappointed. The chief priests and elders had been busy amongst the
crowds, persuading and moving them. We do not know the arguments they
would employ; but we all know how inflammable a mob is, and presently the
name of Barabbas began to sound ominously from amid the hubbub and murmur
of that sea of human beings. Presently the isolated cries spread into a
tumultuous clamour, which rang out in the morning air, "Not this man, but
Barabbas!"
Pilate seems to have been dumbfounded at this unexpected demand; and said,
almost pitifully, "What then shall I do with Jesus which is called
Christ?" As though he had said, "You surely cannot mean that He should
suffer the fate prepared for a murderer!" Then they cried out for the
first time, To the cross, to the cross! "Crucify Him! crucify Him!"
Pilate had failed twice; he felt that he was being swept away by a current
which already he could not stem, and which was becoming at every moment
deeper and swifter. But he was very anxious to release Jesus; and so he
tried to reason with them, and said, "Why, what evil hath He done?" But he
might as hopefully have tried to argue with an angry sea, or with a pack
of wolves. He felt this, and, mustering a little show of authority, said:
"I have found no cause of death in Him; I will, therefore, chastise Him,
and release Him." But this announcement was met by an infuriated shout of
disapproval. "They were instant with loud voices, requiting that He might
be crucified." "They cried out the more exceedingly, Crucify Him." A
little before this Pilate had been besieged for six days in his palace at
Caesarea by similar crowds, whose persistent fury at last compelled him to
give in to them. He dared not provoke similar scenes, lest they should
result in a revolution. When he saw that he could prevail nothing, but
that rather a tumult was made, he called for water. He said to himself, "I
am very sorry; this Man is innocent, and I should like to save Him. But I
have done my best, and can do no more. I will, at least, relieve myself of
the responsibility of his blood. Slave, bring me water!"
As he washed his hands he said, "I am innocent of the blood of this
righteous Man; see ye to it." "Yes, yes," cried those bloodthirsty voices;
"his blood be on us, and on our children." See how God sometimes takes men
at their word. The blood of Jesus was required of that generation at the
sack of Jerusalem, forty years after; and it has been required of their
children through all the ages. Why that wandering foot, found in every
land, yet homeless in all? Why the hideous tortures, plunderings, and
massacres of the Middle Ages? Why the modern Jew-hate, disguised under the
more refined term anti-Semitism? Why the banishment from their holy places
for eighteen centuries? All is attributable to that terrible imprecation
which attracted to the race the blood of an innocent Victim. It does not
exculpate them to say that they did not realize who Jesus was, and that
they would not have crucified Him if they had realized his divine dignity.
They are being punished to-day, not because they crucified the Son of God,
knowing Him to be such, but because they crucified One against whom they
could allege no crime, and whose life had been full of truth and grace.
After he had washed his hands, "Pilate gave sentence that it should be as
they required, and released unto them him that for sedition and murder had
been cast into prison, whom they desired; but he delivered Jesus to their
will."
Those condemned to die by crucifixion first underwent the hideous torture
of the scourge. This, then, was inflicted on Jesus, and it was carried out
in the inner courtyard by the Roman soldiery, under Pilate's direction.
"Then Pilate therefore took Jesus, and scourged Him." Stripped to the
waist, and bound in a stooping posture to a low pillar, He was beaten till
the officer in charge gave the signal to stop. The plaited leathern
thongs, armed at the ends with lead and sharp-pointed bone, cut the back
open in all directions, and inflicted such torture that the sufferers
generally fainted, and often died.
But the scourging in this case did not satisfy the soldiers, whom scenes
of this nature had brutalized. They had been told by their comrades of the
mockery of Herod's palace, and they would not lag behind. Had He been
robed in mockery as King of the Jews, then He should pose as mock-emperor.
They found a purple robe, wove some tough thorns into a mimic crown,
placed a long reed in his hand as sceptre, then bowed the knee, as in the
imperial court, and cried "Hail, King of the Jews l" Finally, tiring of
their brutal jests, they tore the reed from his hands, smote Him with it
on his thorn-girt brow, and struck Him with their fists. We cannot tell
how long it lasted, but Jesus bore it all--silent, uncomplaining, noble.
There was a majesty about Him which these indignities could not suppress
or disturb.
Pilate had never seen such elevation of demeanour, and was greatly struck
by it. He was more than ever desirous to save Him, and it suddenly
occurred to him that perhaps that spectacle of sorrow and majesty might
arrest the fury of the rabble. He therefore led Jesus forth wearing the
crown of thorns and the purple robe, and, stationing him where all could
see, said, "Behold the Man! Behold Him and admire! Behold Him and pity!
Behold Him and be content!" But the priests were obdurate. There is no
hate so virulent as religious hate, and they raised again the cry,
"Crucify Him l crucify Him!" Pilate was not only annoyed, but provoked.
"Take ye Him," he said, in surly tones, "crucify Him as best ye can; my
soldiers and I will have nothing to do with the foul deed."
Then it was that the Jewish leaders, in their eagerness not to lose their
prey, brought forward a weapon which they had been reluctant to use. "We
have a law," they said, "and by our law He ought to die, because He made
Himself the Son of God." We hardly know how much those words meant to
Pilate, but they awakened a strange awe. "He was the more afraid." He had
some knowledge of the old stories of mythology, in which the gods walked
the world in the semblance of men. Could this be the explanation of the
strange majesty in this wonderful Sufferer, whose presence raised such
extraordinary passion and ferment? So he took Jesus apart, and said to
Him, "Whence art Thou? .... Art Thou of human birth, or more?" But Jesus
gave him no answer. This is the fifth time that He had answered nothing;
but we can detect the reason. It would have been useless to explain all to
Pilate then. It would not have arrested his action, for he had lost
control; but would have increased his condemnation. Yet his silence was
itself an answer; for if He had been only of earth, He could never have
allowed Pilate to entertain the faintest suspicion that He might be of
heaven.
Pilate's pride was touched by that silence. It was at least possible to
assert a power over this defenceless Prisoner, which had been defied by
those vindictive Jews. "Speakest Thou not unto me? Knowest Thou not that I
have power to release or to crucify Thee?" And Jesus answered, "Thou
couldest have no power against Me, except it were given thee from above;
therefore, he that delivered Me unto thee hath the greater sin." In these
words our Lord seems to refer to the mystery of evil, and specially the
power of the prince of this world, who was now venting on Him all his
malice. At this moment the serpent was bruising the heel of the Son of
Man, who shortly would bruise his head. It would appear as though our Lord
were addressing kind and compassionate words to Pilate. "Great as your sin
is, in abusing your prerogative, given to you from above, it is less than
the sin of that Evil Spirit who has cast Me into your power, and is urging
you to extreme measures against Me. The devil sinneth from the beginning."
Even in his sore travail, the Lord was tender and pitiful to this weak and
craven soul, and spoke to it as though Pilate and not He were arraigned at
the bar.
Pilate was now more than ever set on his deliverance. "He sought to
release Him." And then the Jews brought out their last crushing and
conclusive argument, "If thou release this Man, thou art not Caesar's
friend; everyone that maketh himself a king, speaketh against Caesar."
Pilate knew what that meant, and that if he did not let them have their
way, they would lodge an accusation against him for complicity with
treason before his imperial master. Already strong representations had
been made in the same quarter against his maladministration of his
province, and he positively dared not risk another. "When, therefore, he
heard these words, he brought Jesus out, and sat down in the judgment seat
at a place called the Pavement, and it was about the sixth hour."
With ill-concealed irritation, and adopting the recent phraseology of the
priests, he said, "Behold your King!" At which they cried, "We have no
king but Caesar. Away with Him; away with Him; crucify Him." It gave
Pilate savage pleasure to put the cup of humiliation to their lips, and
make them drain it to its dregs. "What!" said he; "shall I crucify your
King?" Then they touched the lowest depth of degradation, as, abandoning
all their Messianic hopes, and trampling under foot their national pride,
they answered, "We have no king but Caesar."
At last, therefore, he delivered Jesus to them to be crucified, signed the
usual documents, gave the customary order, and retired into his palace, as
one who had heard his own sentence pronounced, and carried in his soul the
presage of his doom.
Long years after, when, stripped of his Procuratorship which he had
sacrificed Christ to save, worn out by his misfortunes, and universally
execrated, he was an exile in a foreign land, with his faithful wife, how
often must they have spoken together of the events of that morning, which
had so strangely affected their lives! |
|