|















Search chap/verse
Search word: Retrieve verses, illustrations, etc |

| |
INDEX
PREVIOUS
NEXT
|
COLLECTIONS
Commentaries,
Word Studies, Devotionals, Sermons, Illustrations
Old and New Testament. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Hebrews 5:4
And
no
one
takes the
honor to
himself, but
receives it when he is
called by
God,
even as
Aaron was. (NASB:
Lockman) |
|
Greek:
kai
ouch
heauto
tis
lambanei
ten
timen,
alla
kaloumenos
hupo
tou
theou,
kathosper
kai
Aaron.
Amplified: Besides, one does not appropriate for himself the
honor [of being high priest], but he is called by God and receives it
of Him, just as Aaron did.
(Amplified
Bible - Lockman)
Barclay: No one takes this honourable position to himself, but
he is called by God to it, just as Aaron was. (Westminster
Press)
KJV: And no man taketh this honour unto himself, but he that is
called of God, as was Aaron.
NLT: And no one can become a high priest simply because
he wants such an honor. He has to be called by God for this work, just
as Aaron was. (NLT
- Tyndale House)
Phillips: Note also that nobody chooses for himself the honour
of being a High Priest, but he is called by God to the work, as was
Aaron, the first High Priest in ancient times. (Phillips:
Touchstone)
Wuest: And not to himself does one take this honor, but being
called by God, even as also Aaron. (Eerdmans)
Young's Literal: and no one to himself doth take the honour,
but he who is called by God, as also Aaron: |
|
|
|
|
AND NO ONE TAKES THE
HONOR TO HIMSELF: kai ouch heauto
tis lambanei (3SPAI) ten
timen: (Ex 28:1;
Leviticus 8:2; Nu 3:3; 16:5,7,10,35,40,46, 47, 48; 17:3-11; 18:1, 2, 3, 4,
5; 1Chr 23:13; 2Chr 26:18)
OT PASSAGES QUOTED IN HEBREWS 5 -
Click for complete list of OT
Quotations/Allusions
He 5:5 <> Ps 2:7
He 5:6 <> Ps 110:4
He 5:10 <> Ps 110:4
KEY WORDS IN HEBREWS 5 -
Click for complete list of Key Words in
Hebrews
Eternal - He 5:9
Sacrifice - He 5:1, 3
Priest - He 5:1, 5, 6, 10
CONSIDER JESUS
OUR GREAT HIGH PRIEST
|
INSTRUCTION
He 1:1-10:18 |
EXHORTATION
He 10:19-13:25 |
REVELATION
He 1:1-10:18 |
RESPONSE
He 10:19-13:25 |
PRECEPTS
He 1:1-10:18 |
PRACTICE
He 10:19-13:25 |
DOCTRINE
He 1:1-10:18 |
DUTY
He 10:19-13:25 |
SUPERIORITY
of
CHRIST'S PERSON
He 1:1-7:28 |
SUPERIORITY
of
CHRIST'S PRIESTHOOD
He 8:1-10:18 |
SUPERIORITY
of the
CHRISTIAN'S PRACTICE
He 10:19-13:25 |
|
MAJESTY
OF CHRIST
He 1:1-4:13 |
MINISTRY
OF CHRIST
He 4:14-10:18 |
MINISTERS
FOR CHRIST
He 10:19-13:25 |
|
SUPERIORITY
OF CHRIST
He 1:1-4:13 |
SUPERIORITY
OF PRIESTHOOD
He 4:14-10:18 |
SUPERIORITY
OF THE POWER OF CHRIST
He 10:19-13:25 |
|
Christ
the
Son of God
He 1:1-2:4 |
Christ
the
Son of Man
He 2:5-4:13 |
Christ
the
High Priest
He 4:14-10:18 |
Christ
the
Way
He 10:19-13:25 |
|
This
chart is adapted in part from Jensen's Survey of the NT and
Wilkinson's Talk Thru the Bible |
CHRIST PRIESTHOOD
SUPERIOR QUALIFICATIONS
He 5:1-10
Ryrie summarizes chapter 5...
The qualifications for high priest are stated in these verses, Aaron serving
as the model:
(1) he had to be a man (Hebrews 5:1);
(2) he had to be compassionate (Hebrews 5:2);
(3) he had to be chosen by God (Hebrews 5:4, 5, 6);
(4) he had to learn through suffering (Hebrews 5:7, 8).
Henry Alford summarizes the two necessary qualifications of a high
priest fulfilled in Christ as
(1) He 5:1,
2, 3, he must be taken from among men, capable, in respect of infirmity, of
feeling for men,
(2) He 5:4-10, he must not have taken the dignity upon himself, but have
been appointed by God. (Hebrews 5 Commentary)
(In regard to) The High Priesthood of Christ...That which has before
been...by anticipation hinted at, He 2:17; He 3:1; He 4:14, 15 (Ed:
Also suggested in He 1:3, so "previewed" 4 times in prior passages) is now
taken up and thoroughly discussed.
In this section the writer continues with the second requirement of the Jewish high priest,
indicating that he must be chosen and appointed by God.
A W Pink makes the point that
Considering the strictness of God’s law, and the specified requirements for
one entering the priestly office, and more especially seeing that Jesus did
not belong to the tribe of Levi, how could He be said to be
“Priest?” In meeting this difficulty, the apostle emphasizes the fact that
the chief requirement and qualification was a Divine
call: “No man takes this honor unto himself, but he that is called
of God” (He 5:4): applying that rule the apostle now shows, from Scripture
itself, our Lord’s right and title to this office.
No one (ouch) indicates absolute negation and continues the
discussion specifically of the high priesthood (Heb 5:1) emphasizing that
the requirements for who could be a priest in Israel were strictly
stipulated in the Scripture and as Pink says, first and foremost, one had to
be called by God to that position.
How might we apply this truth in our lives today?
If you are a believer, you have at least one spiritual gift (1Pe 4:10-note,
Ro 12:6-note)
and you are a priest (1Pe 2:9-note)
of the Most High God. In short, you have a ministry. The question then is
have you discovered the ministry He has granted you or have you sought a
ministry of your own making. Your answer has eternal ramifications, for
unless we abide in the Vine, we can do nothing of eternal value (Jn 15:5).
Dear Father, please show every man and woman reading these notes what Your
ministry to and through them is and cause them to walk in your way and will
in Christ Jesus, that them might bear much fruit (Jn 15:8) for eternity (Jn
15:16). Amen.
Received (2983)
(lambano) conveys the sense of one taking or grasping at a title or
position (high priest) without any Biblical mandate. Rendering it as
"received" somewhat softens the writer's intent that no one could simply
decide he wanted to be the high priest and then declare himself as such!
Absolutely no one could become a high priest simply by claiming to be one.
Honor (5092)
(time from tío = pay honor, respect) is basically, the worth
ascribed to a person or the value ascribed to a thing. It refers to the
worth or merit of some object, event, or state. It is a valuing by which the
price is fixed, an estimation of the value of a thing. It is an attitude
towards person or thing commensurate with its value and in the present
context conveys the sense of rank, position or "office".
Time - 41x in 40v in the NAS - Matt 27:6, 9; John 4:44;
Acts 4:34; 5:2f; 7:16; 19:19; 28:10; Rom 2:7, 10; 9:21; 12:10; 13:7; 1 Cor
6:20; 7:23; 12:23f; Col 2:23; 1Th 4:4; 1Ti1:17; 5:17; 6:1, 16; 2 Tim 2:20f;
Heb 2:7, 9; 3:3; 5:4; 1 Pet 1:7; 2:7; 3:7; 2 Pet 1:17; Rev 4:9, 11; 5:12f;
7:12; 21:26. NAS = honor(28), honorable use(1), marks of respect(1),
precious value(1), price(7), proceeds(1), sum(1), value(1).
This same Greek word (time)
is used by the Jewish Historian Josephus to denote the “office” of high priest (Ant.
3.188–89).
BUT RECEIVES IT WHEN HE IS
CALLED BY GOD EVEN AS AARON WAS: alla kaloumenos (PPPMSN) hupo tou theou kathosper kai Aaron:
But receives it (honor) - Receives is not in the Greek text
but is supplied by the translators to lend fluidity to the sentence.
John the Baptist declared...
A man can receive nothing, unless it has been given him from heaven. (John
3:27)
The office of high priest could not be campaigned for but was given by right
of birth to the man chosen by God. It was an honor no man could take to
himself.
Marcus Dods explains that...
An additional reason for trusting in the priest is that he has not assumed
the office to gratify his own ambition but to serve God’s purpose of
restoring men to His fellowship. All genuine priesthood is the carrying out
of God’s will. The priest must above all else be obedient, in sympathy with
God as well as in sympathy with man. God’s appointment also secures that the
suitable qualifications will be found in the priest. (The
Expositor's Greek Testament - online)
Call (invite, name, summon) (2564)(kaleo
from root kal-, whence
English “call” and “clamour”) literally means to speak to another in order
to attract their attention or to them bring nearer, either physically or in
a personal relationship.
When he is called
- This refers to a call to a particular position and service to God.
In the Old Testament this call to the Levitical priesthood was only
given to certain men...
Then bring near to yourself
Aaron your
brother, and his sons
with him, from among the sons of Israel, to minister as priest to Me--
Aaron, Nadab and Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar, Aaron's sons. (Exodus 28:1)
Take
Aaron
and his sons with him, and the garments and the anointing oil
and the bull of the sin offering, and the two rams and the basket of
unleavened bread (Leviticus 8:2)
The sons of Amram were Aaron and Moses. And
Aaron
was set apart to sanctify
him as most holy, he and his sons forever, to burn incense before the LORD,
to minister to Him and to bless in His name forever. (1Chr 23:13)
Even as
Aaron was - This reference to Aaron (a
Levi, the first high priest) emphasizes that the priesthood was not a human
institution but a divine calling.
There are some tragic examples where men presumed to act as priests who
were not priests, such as
Korah
(Numbers 16), Saul (1 Samuel 13) and
King Uzziah who disregarded the fact that no one was to attempt to function as a
priest on his own volition. Scripture records that when King Uzziah...
became strong, his heart was so proud that he acted corruptly, and he was
unfaithful to the LORD his God, for he entered the temple of the LORD to
burn incense on the altar of incense...18 And they opposed Uzziah the king
and said to him, "It is not for you, Uzziah, to burn incense to the LORD,
but for the priests, the sons of Aaron who are consecrated to burn incense.
Get out of the sanctuary, for you have been unfaithful, and will have no
honor from the LORD God." 19 But Uzziah, with a censer in his hand for
burning incense, was enraged; and while he was enraged with the priests, the
leprosy broke out on his forehead before the priests in the house of the
LORD, beside the altar of incense. 20 And Azariah the chief priest and all
the priests looked at him, and behold, he was leprous on his forehead; and
they hurried him out of there, and he himself also hastened to get out
because the LORD had smitten him. (2Chronicles 26:16, 18, 19, 20)
Comment from ISBE on Uzziah's presumptive sin of assuming priestly
function: In the earlier part of his career Uzziah had enjoyed and
profited by the counsels of Zechariah, a man "who had understanding in the
vision of God" (2Ch 26:5), and during the lifetime of this godly monitor "be
set himself to seek God." Now it happened to him as with his grandfather
Jehoash, who, so long as his preserver Jehoiada lived, acted admirably, but,
when he died, behaved like an ingrate, and killed his son (2Ki 12:2; 2Ch
24:2,22). So now that Zechariah was gone, Uzziah's heart was lifted up in
pride, and he trespassed against Yahweh. In the great kingdoms of the East,
the kings had been in the habit of exercising priestly as well as royal
functions. Elated with his prosperity, Uzziah determined to exercise what he
may have thought was his royal prerogative in burning incense on the golden
altar of the temple. Azariah the high priest, with 80 others, offered stout
remonstrance; but the king was only angry, and pressed forward with a censer
in his hand, to offer the incense. Ere, however, he could scatter the
incense on the coals, and while yet in anger, the white spots of leprosy
showed themselves upon his forehead. Smitten in conscience, and thrust forth
by the priests, he hastened away, and was a leper ever after (2Ch 26:16-20,
21). Uzziah's public life was now ended. (Uzziah)
Hughes comments...
The divine appointment of Aaron was confirmed, moreover, at the time of the
revolt of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram who accused him of having exalted
himself to a position of prominence and whom Moses rebuked with these words:
"It is against the Lord that you and all your company have gathered
together; what is Aaron that you murmur against him?" (Nu 16:11).
Subsequently, the sprouting of Aaron's rod alone among the rods of
the leaders convinced the rebellious Israelites that he was indeed the man
whom God had chosen and not one who had arrogated the high priesthood to
himself (Nu 17:1ff.; cf. Heb. 9:4). (A
Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews)
Steven Cole...
The appointment of the high priest: He does not take it upon himself, but
must be called by God (He 5:4).
Although in the first century the Jewish high priesthood had degenerated
into a political appointment, the author overlooks that and goes back to the
original intention. God called Aaron to the office of high priest (Ex 28:1,
2, 3), and he served as the example for all that followed. God’s appointment
of Aaron to this office was confirmed during the rebellion of
Korah, who accused Moses and Aaron of
appointing themselves (Nu 16:1-35). God showed the rebels and all of Israel
that He had appointed Moses and Aaron by causing the ground to open up and
swallow the rebels and their households. When some in the congregation
grumbled at this judgment, a plague broke out and killed over 14,000.
That was a sober lesson that no one
may dare to approach God
in the way of man’s own choosing.
The only way to approach God is through the way of God’s choosing, through
His ordained mediator. In the Old Testament, that mediator was the high
priest. But the fact that all of these priests were themselves sinners
pointed to the inadequacy of that old covenant and the need for the perfect
high priest, the Lord Jesus Christ (cp He 8:6, 9:15, 12:24). (Hebrews
5:1-10 The Kind of Priest You Need)
In the OT a call of
God to undeserving men was part of His gracious dealing with
sinful mankind. We see examples of God's graciously calling individuals to
certain "ministries"...
Abraham
1
Now the LORD said to Abram, "Go forth from your country, And from your
relatives And from your father's house, To the land which I will show you;
2 And I will make you a great nation, And I will bless you, And make your
name great; And so you shall be a blessing;
3 And I will bless those who bless you, And the one who curses you I will
curse. And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed." (Ge
12:1-3)
Moses
"Therefore, come now, and I will send you to Pharaoh, so that you may bring
My people, the sons of Israel, out of Egypt." (Ex 3:10)
Bezaleel
2
"See, I have called by name Bezalel, the son of Uri, the son of Hur, of the
tribe of Judah. 3 "And I have filled him with the Spirit of God in wisdom,
in understanding, in knowledge, and in all kinds of craftsmanship, 4 to make
artistic designs for work in gold, in silver, and in bronze, 5 and in the
cutting of stones for settings, and in the carving of wood, that he may work
in all kinds of craftsmanship. (Ex 31:2-5)
Isaiah
Then I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, "Whom shall I send, and who will
go for Us?" Then I said, "Here am I. Send me!"9 And He said, "Go, and tell
this people: 'Keep on listening, but do not perceive; Keep on looking, but
do not understand. (Isaiah 6:8, 9)
Jeremiah
Now the word of the LORD came to me saying, 5 "Before I formed you in the
womb I knew you, And before you were born I consecrated you; I have
appointed you a prophet to the nations." (Jer 1:4, 5),
Ezekiel
Then He said to me, "Son of man, I am sending you to the sons of Israel, to
a rebellious people who have rebelled against Me; they and their fathers
have transgressed against Me to this very day. 4 "And I am sending you to
them who are stubborn and obstinate children; and you shall say to them,
'Thus says the Lord GOD.' (Ezek 2:3-4)
All New Testament believers have been called into God's priesthood as Peter
declared in his first epistle writing that...
you are A CHOSEN RACE, A royal PRIESTHOOD, A HOLY NATION, A PEOPLE
FOR God's OWN POSSESSION, that you may proclaim the excellencies of Him who
has called you out of darkness into His marvelous light (1Pe 2:9-note)
(Note: Do not misinterpret Peter for he is not saying that the NT church
replaces Israel in God's prophetic timetable - see discussion of
Israel of God)
The question we each to ask is "Am I fulfilling my calling by God to the
priesthood of believers?"
Guzik qualifies the believers' priesthood noting that...
We can also not take the honor of being our own priest. It is great
arrogance to think we can approach God on our own, without a priest; but it
is great superstition to think we need any other priest other than Jesus
Christ Himself. God has provided a mediator, a priest, and we must avail
ourselves of the priest God has provided.
Matthew Poole in his excellent mid-seventeenth century commentary
wrote that...
A
sinner can undertake to manage nothing towards God immediately, or by
himself, but with a mediating priest, who must know God’s mind and perform
it . . . The common sense of mankind about it since the fall doth evidence
it; no nation being without a religion, a temple, a place of worship, or a
priest.
C. H. Spurgeon had the following assessment regarding Matthew Poole's
commentary writing that...
If I must have only one commentary, and had read Matthew Henry as I have, I
do not know but what I should choose Poole. He is a very prudent and
judicious commentator... not so pithy and witty by far as Matthew Henry, but
he is perhaps more accurate, less a commentator, and more an expositor.
Even as Aaron - see Ex. 28:1; 29:4: Lev. 8:1: Nu 3:10 and
especially Nu 16–18.
|
|
Hebrews 5:5
So
also
Christ did not
glorify
Himself so as
to
become a
high
priest, but He
who
said to Him,
"YOU ARE MY
SON,
TODAY I HAVE
BEGOTTEN YOU" (NASB:
Lockman) |
|
Greek:
Houtos
kai
o
Christos
ouch
heauton edoxasen
genethenai
archierea,
all'
o
lalesas
pros
auton,
Huios
mou
ei
su,
ego
semeron
gegenneka
se;
Amplified: So too Christ (the Messiah) did not exalt Himself to
be made a high priest, but was appointed and exalted by Him Who said
to Him, You are My Son; today I have begotten You;
(Amplified
Bible - Lockman)
Barclay: So it was not Christ who gave himself the glory of
becoming high priest; but it was God who said to him: “You are my
beloved Son; today I have begotten you.” (Westminster
Press)
KJV: So also Christ glorified not himself to be made an high
priest; but he that said unto him, Thou art my Son, to day have I
begotten thee.
NLT: That is why Christ did not exalt himself to become High
Priest. No, he was chosen by God, who said to him, "You are my Son.
Today I have become your Father." (NLT
- Tyndale House)
Phillips: Thus we see that the Christ did not choose for
himself the glory of being High Priest, but he was honoured by the one
who said: 'You are my Son, today I have begotten you'. (Phillips:
Touchstone)
Wuest: So also the Messiah did not glorify himself in becoming
a high priest, but the One who said to Him, My Son you are, I this day
have begotten you. (Eerdmans)
Young's Literal: so also the Christ did not glorify
himself to become chief priest, but He who spake unto him: 'My Son
thou art, I to-day have begotten thee;' |
|
|
SO ALSO CHRIST DID NOT GLORIFY HIMSELF SO AS TO BECOME A HIGH
PRIEST: Houtos kai o Christos ouch heauton edoxasen (3SAAI) genethenai (APN) archierea:
(John 7:18; 8:54) (Hebrews 1:5; Psalms 2:7; Micah 5:2; John 3:16; Acts
13:33; Romans 8:3)
So also - The writer is drawing a clear parallel with the Aaronic
(Levitical) priesthood. Even as Aaron (and other Levitical priests) did not
exalt themselves to the priesthood, so too Christ did not exalt Himself, but
was appointed by His Father to be High Priest (as the writer has already
alluded to - He 2:17-note,
He 3:1-note,
He 4:14-note).
Christ - The definite article is present in the original Greek so
that this reads literally "the Christ" and thus the "Messiah",
the "Anointed One" (cp Da 9:25-note,
Da 9:26-note)
Pink makes the point that in using "the Christ", the writer's
specific
design was to demonstrate that the promised
Messiah, (Hebrew = Mashiach -
04899) the Hope of the fathers (Jer 50:7,
Acts 26:6), was to be High Priest forever over the house of God. The
“Anointed One” (meaning of "Messiah") signified His unction unto this
office.
Marcus Dod makes the point that...
The designation, “the Christ,” is introduced, because it might not
have seemed so significant a statement if made of “Jesus”. It was not
personal ambition that moved Christ. He did not come in His own name, nor
did He seek to glorify Himself. See Jn 8:54; 5:31, 43; 17:5 (Hebrews 5 Commentary
Online)
The primary ministry of Jesus today is as our forever High Priest Who represents us before God
the Father Who chose His
Son to be our eternal Priest. If we were first century Jews who had believed
in the Messiah, it would be difficult to grasp the truth that Jesus was the
Great High Priest. He was not from the line of Aaron. Even when He was in
the Temple in Jerusalem, He did not attempt to practice what the Jews would
recognize as a priestly ministry. And so we can understand why the writer goes
to such great lengths to explain why Jesus would be qualified to be a High
Priest. The writer is trying to get his Jewish readers to make what we would
call today a "paradigm shift" in their thinking - ultimately a shift from
the Old Covenant of law, bondage and death to the New Covenant of grace,
freedom and life.
Dear searching reader, have you made that "paradigm shift"?
Even in the time of the Old Covenant the way of salvation was clearly
proclaimed and the call of God has always been...
Turn to Me, and
be saved,
all the ends of the earth; For I am God, and there is no other. (Is 45:22-
see
How God used this very passage to save
Charles Haddon Spurgeon from the guttermost to the uttermost!)
And so Jesus did not glorify Himself. Instead in John Jesus speaks of the
One Who gives glory...
John 7:18 "He who speaks from himself seeks his own glory; but He who
is seeking the glory of the One Who sent Him (God the Father), He is true, and there is no
unrighteousness in Him.
John 8:54 Jesus answered, "If I glorify Myself, My glory is nothing;
it is My Father who glorifies Me, of Whom you say, 'He is our God';
In fact Jesus exemplified the antithesis of self-glorification in His
kenosis or self-emptying...
but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being
made in the likeness of men. (Php 2:7-note,
in perfect accord with Mt 23:12, which is the example for all His
disciples!)
Glorify (1392)(doxazo)
means Christ did not ascribe praise to Himself or esteem Himself by putting
Himself into the honorable position of high priest.
Hughes explains that...
The sayings of Christ recorded in
the Fourth Gospel make it emphatically plain that the glory which the Son
sought with intense singleness of purpose was the glory of the Father
who had sent him (Jn 7:18; 8:42; 9:4; 10:18, 25, 38; 11:42; 12:28, 44f, 49f;
14:7, 9, 13, 24, 31; 15:8, 23; 16:27f.; 17:1, 4ff.). Indeed, if one thing is
stressed throughout the New Testament it is that, in assuming the office of
Savior and High Priest, so far was the Son from exalting and glorifying
Himself that He accepted it knowing full well that it meant for Him the
experience of the darkest depths of humiliation, rejection, agony, and
death. His office-bearing was the furthest possible remove from
self-glorification. To put it colloquially, there was nothing in it for
him—only the certainty of unutterable anguish and alienation and immolation
suffered vicariously for our redemption.
Yet the cross of Christ is also the
glory of Christ. This moment of his solitude and self-sacrifice is also the
moment when He is glorified, not indeed self-glorified, but glorified
because in Him God is glorified and the divine purpose for the redemption of
the world is now accomplished (cf. Jn 12:23; 13:31; Heb. 10:9f.). And the
awful glory of His humiliation is followed by the resplendent glory of His
exaltation—not, again, self-exaltation—when, raised to the right hand of the
Majesty on high, the glory of His triumphant redeemership is, so to speak,
added to the glory, which He now resumes, of His eternal sonship (cf. Heb.
1:3; 2:9; 12:2; Acts 3:13; Phil. 2:5-11; Jn. 17:4f., 24).A Commentary On The
Epistle To The Hebrews. (A
Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews -
recommended resource)
High priest
(749)
(archiereus from arche = first in a series, the leader
or ruler + hiereus = priest) (Dictionary articles -
Easton's;
ISBE)
refers to the priest that was chief over all the other priests in
Israel. This office was established by God through Moses instructions
in the Pentateuch. The high priest functioned as the mediator between
Jehovah and Israel performing sacrifices and rituals like other
priests, but in addition acting to expiate the sins of the nation on
the annual Day of Atonement.
The irony is that the high
priest Caiaphas was residing over the Sanhedrin during trial of
Jesus, the trial which would lead to His death and pave the way for
His eternal High Priesthood!
Eerdman's
Bible Dictionary explains that...
The high priest descended from
Eleazar, the son of Aaron. The office was normally hereditary and was
conferred upon an individual for life (Nu 25:10-13). The candidate was
consecrated in a seven-day ceremony which included investiture with
the special clothing of his office as well as anointments and
sacrifices (Ex 29:1-37; Lev 8:5-35).
The high priest was bound to a higher degree of ritual purity than
ordinary Levitical priests. He could have no contact with dead bodies,
including those of his parents. Nor could he rend his clothing or
allow his hair to grow out as signs of mourning. He could not marry a
widow, divorced woman, or harlot, but only an Israelite virgin (Lev.
21:10-15). Any sin committed by the high priest brought guilt upon the
entire nation and had to be countered by special sacrifice (Lev
4:1-12). Upon a high priest’s death manslayers were released from the
cities of refuge (Nu 35:25, 28, 32). (Eerdman's
Bible Dictionary)
Archiereus
occurs only in the Gospels (Matthew
- 25 times,
Mark 21 times,
Luke 15 times,
John 20 times),
Acts 22 times
and 17 times in Hebrews. The
references to the high priests in the Gospels and Acts refers
primarily to their bitter opposition to Jesus Who the writer of
Hebrews identifies as our everlasting High Priest.
BUT HE WHO SAID TO HIM
"THOU ART MY SON, TODAY I HAVE BEGOTTEN THEE": all o lalesas (AAPMSN) pros
auton Huios mou ei (2SPAI) su ego semeron gegenneka (1SRAI) se:
QUOTING FROM
PSALM 2:7
Having just stated that no man was entitled to appoint himself as high
priest but that he became such only by divine call, even Christ did not make
Himself High Priest, but God the Father recognized Him as such. The writer's
argument is that just as much as Jesus was declared to be the Son of God by God
Himself (Psalm 2:7), so also Jesus was declared to be a priest forever
according to a different order, not of Levi but of Melchizedek (Psalm 110:4).
Phil
Newton adds that...
None of the angels were declared to be the Son of God. The same is
true of the high priests. They were sons of Aaron, the first high priest in
the tribe of Levi and father and grandfather of all who followed. Quoting
from the second Psalm a passage already quoted in He 1:5, the writer now
declares the uniqueness of the sonship of Jesus Christ. In that Psalm the
ancient hymnist muses on the nations' rebellion against the Creator as
Sovereign. Here he declares that God the Creator has "installed" His
King-Jesus Christ the Lord-to rule the nations! How does he identify this
King? "YOU ARE MY SON, TODAY I HAVE BEGOTTEN YOU." Even in the face
of Neronian persecution these struggling believers could have confidence
that God the Son reigns! They did not have to go on in fear but with
confidence that His purposes would be accomplished because He reigns over
the nations. The emphasis on "You are My Son" points to the
Incarnation. He is the eternal Son of God without beginning or end; but He
is also the Son born in time-born of woman, embracing a human nature
forever. We could think of His reigning over humanity from his lofty
heavenly throne without being human. But we could not think of Him serving
as our high priest without being one of us. Thus the Incarnation is
the declaration of the Son of God becoming a Son of Man, so that as
high priest mediating the way for us, we might become sons of God.
(Jesus
Christ: Qualified as High Priest Hebrews 5:1-10)
(Bolding added)
Psalm 2 is a Psalm which is
indisputably Messianic as shown by the fact that the NT writers quote from
it in references that are clearly speaking of Jesus. The reader is
encouraged to listen to the two part exposition (each about 45 minutes) of
this great psalm by my dear brother in Christ, Tony Garland -
Mp3 Part 1
;
Mp3 Part 2
(Or see the Pdf transcript
Why Do the Nations Rage?).
The Jewish readers of this exhortational letter ("sermon") to the Hebrews
undoubtedly understood Psalm 2 and Psalm 110 (quoted in the next verse
- Hebrews 5:6) as prophecies related to the Messiah, their Hope. And so the
writer buttresses his argument by quoting from Psalm 2:7. As
you recall, the writer had previously quoted from Psalm 2:7 in He 1:5 (note)
using this quotation to
establish the fact that Christ was superior to the angels. Now in Hebrews 5
the writer quotes from this same psalm to help him establish that the
priesthood of Christ is superior to the Levitical priesthood, for no
Levitical priest was ever called the Son of God.
Psalm 2:7 "I will surely tell of the decree of the LORD: He said to
Me, 'Thou art My Son, Today I have begotten Thee.
Psalm 2:7-note
is also quoted by Paul in Acts 13. Upon Jesus' resurrection God is said to
have declared Christ as begotten, Luke recording Paul's quotation
from Psalm 2 stating...
that God has fulfilled this promise to our children in that He raised up
Jesus, as it is also written in the second Psalm, 'THOU ART MY SON; TODAY I
HAVE BEGOTTEN THEE.' (Acts 13:3)
In the context of Acts 13
Paul relates the prophecy in Psalm 2:7 to Christ's resurrection,
rather than His incarnation. Jesus’ resurrection from the dead marks
the time at which Jesus could fully assume His role as our great High
Priest. In other words, prior to this time (as far as I can discern from the
Scriptures) Jesus did not function specifically as the Great High Priest.
Note that in Acts, Paul referred to Psalm 2 as the "the second psalm,"
supporting that the chapter divisions in the book of Psalms are not the
product of medieval scholars.
In a parallel passage Paul writes that Jesus...
was declared the Son of God with power by the resurrection from the dead
(i.e., the resurrection of Jesus is proof of His deity), according to the
Spirit of holiness, Jesus Christ our Lord (Ro 1:4-note)
Spurgeon commenting on Psalm 2:7 writes...
This Psalm wears something of a dramatic form, for now another person is
introduced as speaking. We have looked into the council chamber of the
wicked, and to the throne of God, and now we behold the Anointed (Ed note:
the Messiah) declaring His rights of sovereignty, and warning the traitors
of their doom.
God has laughed at the counsel and ravings of the wicked, and now Christ,
the Anointed, Himself comes forward, as the Risen Redeemer, "declared to be
the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the
resurrection from the dead."
Romans 1:4.
Looking into the angry faces of the rebellious kings, the Anointed One seems
to say, "If this sufficeth not to make you silent."
I will declare the decree. Now this decree is directly in conflict with the
device of man, for its tenor is the establishment of the very dominion
against which the nations are raving.
Thou art my Son. Here is a noble proof of the glorious Divinity of our
Immanuel. "For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my
Son, this day have I begotten thee?" What a mercy to have a Divine Redeemer
in Whom to rest our confidence!
This day have I begotten thee. If this refers to the Godhead of our Lord,
let us not attempt to fathom it, for it is a great truth, a truth reverently
to be received, but not irreverently to be scanned. It may be added, that if
this relates to the Begotten One in his human nature, we must here also
rejoice in the mystery, but not attempt to violate its sanctity by intrusive
prying into the secrets of the Eternal God. The things which are revealed
are enough, without venturing into vain speculations. In attempting to
define the Trinity, or unveil the essence of Divinity, many men have lost
themselves: here great ships have foundered. What have we to do in such a
sea with our frail skiffs?
><>><>><>
Octavius Winslow has the following devotional on Hebrews 5:5 -
The Atonement of Christ is of infinite value and efficacy. If Christ were a
mere creature, if He claimed no higher dignity than Gabriel, or one of the
prophets or apostles, then His atonement, as it regards the satisfaction of
Divine justice, the honoring of the law, the pardon of sin, the peace of the
conscience, and the salvation of the soul, would possess no intrinsic
efficacy whatever. It would be but the atonement of a finite being - a being
that possessing no superior merit to those in whose behalf the atonement was
made. We state it, then, broadly and unequivocally, that the entire glory,
dignity, value, and efficacy of Christ's precious blood which He shed for
sin rests entirely upon the Deity of His person. If the Deity of Christ
sinks, the atonement of Christ sinks with it; if the one stands, so stands
the other. How strong are the words of Paul, addressed to the Ephesian
elders: "Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock over
which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to feed the church of God
which He has purchased with His own blood." How conclusive is this
testimony! The blood that purchased the church was Divine. It was indeed the
blood of Christ's humanity-for His human nature alone could suffer, bleed,
and die-yet deriving all its glory, value, and efficacy from the union of
the human with the Divine nature. It was the blood of the God-man, Jehovah
Jesus-no inferior blood could have sufficed. The law which Adam, our federal
head, broke, before it could release the sinner from its penalty, demanded a
sacrifice infinitely holy, and infinitely great: one equal with the
Father-the dignity of whose person would impart infinite merit to His work,
and the infinite merit of whose work would fully sustain its honor and its
purity. All this was found in the person of Christ. In His complex person He
was eminently fitted for the mighty work. As God, He obeyed the precepts and
maintained the honor of the law; as man, He bore its curse and endured its
penalty. It was the blending as into one these two natures; the bringing
together these extremes of being, the finite and the infinite, which shed
such resplendent luster on His atonement, which stamped such worth and
efficacy on His blood. Dear Reader, treat not this subject lightly, deem it
not a useless speculation! It is of the deepest moment. If the blood of
Christ possesses not infinite merit, infinite worth, it could never be
efficacious in washing away the guilt of sin, or in removing the dread of
condemnation. When you come to die, this, of all truths, if you are an
experimental believer, will be the most precious and sustaining. In that
solemn hour, when the curtain that conceals the future parts, and eternity
lets down upon the view the full blaze of its awful realities-in that hour,
when all false dependencies will crumble beneath you, and sin's long
catalogue passes in review before you-oh, then to know that the Savior on
whom you depend is God in your nature-that the blood in which you have
washed has in it all the efficacy and value of Deity-this, this will be the
alone plank that will buoy up the soul in that awful moment, and at that
fearful crisis. Oh precious truth this, for a poor believing soul to rest
upon! We wonder not that, fast anchored on this truth, amid circumstances
the most appalling, death in view; wearing even its most terrific aspect,
the believer in Jesus can survey the scene with composure, and quietly yield
his spirit into the hands of Him who redeemed it.
|
|
|
|
JUST AS HE SAYS ALSO IN ANOTHER
PASSAGE: kathos kai en hetero legei (3SPAI):
(Heb
5:10; 6:20; 7:3,15,17,21; Psalm 110:4) (Genesis 14:18,19)
QUOTING FROM
PSALM 110:4
Just as He says - Clearly the writer of Hebrews states it was the
Father speaking in Ps 110:4, a Psalm of David, which the Jews readily
accepted as a Messianic psalm. As an aside, passages such as this attest to
the fact that God is the Author of the Old Testament.
In another place - The Greek is heteros referring to another
but one that is different. To illustrate in Acts 7:18 Luke records that
after Joseph's death "another (heteros) king (pharaoh) arose" one of
quite a different character.
The Priesthood of our Lord was not according to the Levitical order but was
of a completely different character, an order that had been prophesied
almost 1000 years earlier in the Messianic Psalm 110:4 which in a sense
becomes the main text in the central section of the letter (see He 5:10;
6:20; He 7:1, 2, 3, 11, 15, 17, 21).
The writer in fact appeals to
Psalm 110:4 four other times in Hebrews attesting to its significance in
establishing the validity of Jesus' high priesthood...
Hebrews 5:10 (note)
being
designated by God as a high priest according to the order of Melchizedek.
Hebrews 6:20 (note)
where Jesus has entered as a forerunner for us, having become a high priest
forever according to the order of Melchizedek.
Hebrews 7:17 (note)
For it is witnessed of Him, "THOU ART A PRIEST FOREVER ACCORDING TO THE
ORDER OF MELCHIZEDEK."
Hebrews 7:21 (note)
(for they indeed became priests without an oath, but He with an oath through
the One who said to Him, "THE LORD HAS SWORN AND WILL NOT CHANGE HIS MIND,
'THOU ART A PRIEST FOREVER'")
Note that the first verse of Ps 110 has already been utilized by the writer
(Heb 1:13-note)
to defend the fact that Jesus is superior to the angels in having a better
position...
The Lord says to my Lord: “Sit at My right hand until I make Your
enemies a footstool for Your feet.” (Ps 110:1).
THOU ART A PRIEST FOREVER
ACCORDING TO THE ORDER OF MELCHIZEDEK: Su hiereus eis ton aiona kata ten
taxin Melchisedek:
(Heb 5:10; 6:20; 7:17,21; Psalm 110:4)
A priest forever - Such a statement could never be made of the
Levitical priests, all of whom eventually died. The priesthood of Christ is
a better priesthood because He lives and mediates forever (cp He 7:3, He
7:23, 24, He 7:28) (See
excellent article on Priest, Priesthood in Baker's Evangelical Dictionary of
Biblical Theology)
Phil Newton writes that...
We must not miss the emphasis of He 5:6. For the writer stresses that while
the Jewish high priests were appointed divinely in the order of Aaron to
serve their office, the appointment of Jesus Christ supersedes all of them.
His appointment is unique in that he has no claim to the high priesthood
humanly speaking since he was from the tribe of Judah, not the tribe of
Levi. The high priesthood was not up for grabs or given to the highest
bidder. It was a sacred trust of Aaron's sons. But Christ was appointed as
the only high priest whose mediatorial work would have eternal value.
All of the others were mere shadows of Him who would be appointed by God as
Mediator. (Or
another article on "Mediator") Without a
mediator we have no way to God. We have
seen that time after time in analyzing our sinful condition. Only one has
been appointed. Only one has been accepted by God: the Son Whom He declared,
"a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek."
Here was the predicament facing this first century audience. Some were
thinking that they could chart their own course to God. They could divine
their own way to eternal life. Much like the multitudes in our own day that
think that the rules change or bend for them, they thought that obedient
faith in Jesus Christ was not the only way to God. But the only priest whose
work is "forever" is Jesus Christ. Therefore, the only one who can break
through the barrier of our sinfulness and deliver us in righteousness to the
Creator is the One who bore God's judgment for us at the cross.
Are you one whose faith in Jesus Christ is slipping and sliding away?
There's one anchor for the soul-Jesus Christ.
(Jesus
Christ: Qualified as High Priest Hebrews 5:1-10)
(Bolding and links added)
Expositor's Bible Commentary note on priest...
The author of Hebrews uses it of priests generally (He 7:14; 8:4), of the
Levitical priests (He 7:20, etc.), of Melchizedek (He 7:1, 3), and of Christ
(He 5:6; 7:11, 15, 17, 21; 10:21). When it is used of Christ, it seems to
differ but little from "high priest." It is a powerful way of bringing out
certain aspects of Christ's saving work for men. All that a priest does in
offering sacrifice for men Christ does. But whereas they do it only
symbolically, he really effects atonement. (The
Expositors Bible Commentary on Logos or on
Wordsearch)
According to the order - Even as the earthly priests were from the
Aaronic "order", the lineage of Aaron, this Great High Priest was according
to an "order" but one distinct from Aaron.
Order (taxis from tasso = arrange in order) describes a
setting in order, and hence speaks of an order, an arrangement, or a
disposition. Taxis was used especially in the description of
military troops whose line was unbroken and intact.
Taxis - 9x in 8v in the NAS - Luke 1:8; 1Co 14:40; Col 2:5;
Heb 5:6, 10; 6:20; 7:11, 17. NAS = good discipline(1),
order(7), orderly manner(1).
Recall the writer discusses three requirements for the priesthood in Hebrews
5...
(1) He was appointed on men’s behalf to deal with the things concerning God
and as such functioned as the link between God and man.
(2) The priest must be one with men and must have gone through men’s
experiences so that his sympathy would be with them.
(3) No man appoints himself to the priesthood but his appointment is of God.
The priesthood is not a coveted office to be taken but a glorious privilege
to which one is called. This latter point is applicable to all believers
today, for all have been made priests in Christ Jesus. It follows that their
specific ministry to and for God should not be one they chose, but one they
received from God.
Christ met all requirements for the priesthood except that of descent from
Aaron. And yet this seeming deficiency did not disqualify Him, for He was of
another priestly order, greater even than that of Aaron and Levi. The
psalmist had prophesied of this greater order...
Ps 110:4 The LORD has sworn and will not change His mind, "Thou art a
priest forever According to the order of Melchizedek."
Melchizedek is clearly a "key word" in
this central section of Hebrews (He 5:6, 10, 6:20, 7:1, 10, 11, 15, 17). And
despite his prominent place in this letter Melchizedek was a very mysterious priest/king who met Abraham when he returned
from defeating the marauding confederation of kings from the north (see
Genesis 14:17, 18, 19). In the Genesis account, he is merely called "king of
Salem" (meaning "peace") and "priest of the most high God" (the Hebrew name
is El Elyon, "highest God") (El
Elyon: Most High God - Sovereign Over All).
Melchizedek is discussed in greater detail in Hebrews 7:1-21 and as Harry
Ironside writes...
It is enough to point out here that Melchizedek was recognized as priest of
the most high God centuries before the Levitical priesthood came into
existence. The Levitical priesthood and the legal covenant with which it was
connected had their place until the Son, who was to fulfill the Melchizedekian type, should come. (H. A. Ironside Expository Commentary on
Hebrews)
Hughes quotes Westcott who says...
that Melchizedek "represented a non-Jewish, a universal priesthood,"
and that "in relation to the priesthood he occupies the position which
Abraham occupies in relation to the Covenant." But the immediate purpose
of the two quotations given here from the Psalms is to corroborate the
doctrine that Christ's high-priestly office was not from Himself but from
God.
(A
Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews -
excellent resource)
The point is that the priestly work of Jesus Christ would not be limited to
the borders of Israel or the race of Abraham's sons, for in the sufficiency
of the work of Jesus Christ, "He became to all those who obey Him the source
of eternal salvation."
Scofield comments that...
Melchizedek was a suitable type of Christ as High Priest, because:
(1) he
was a man (Heb 7:4 1Ti 2:5);
(2) he was a king-priest (Ge 14:18 w Zec
6:12,13);
(3) his name means "my king is righteous" (Isa 11:5), and he was
king of Salem (peace cp. Isa 11:6, 7, 8, 9);
(4) he had no recorded "beginning of
days" (cp. Jn 1:1) or "end of life" (cp. Ro 6:9; Heb 7:23,
224, 25), nor
(5) was he made a high priest by human appointment (Ps 110:4). But the
contrast between the high priesthood of Melchizedek and Aaron is only as to
person, "order" (or appointment), and duration. In His work Christ follows
the Aaronic pattern, the "shadow" of which Christ was the substance (Heb
8:1-6; 9:1-28).
C H Spurgeon has a lengthy comment on Psalm 110:4 writing
that...
We have now reached the heart of the psalm, which is also the very centre
and soul of our faith. Our Lord Jesus is a Priest King by the ancient oath
of Jehovah: "He glorified not Himself to be made a High Priest," but was
ordained there unto from of old, and was called of God a High Priest after
the order of Melchizedek.
It must be a solemn and a sure matter which leads the Eternal (God) to
swear, and with Him an oath fixes and settles the decree for ever; but in
this case, as if to make assurance a thousand times sure, it is added," and
will not repent."
It is done, and done for ever and ever; Jesus is sworn in to be the Priest
of His people, and He must abide so even to the end, because His commission
is sealed by the unchanging oath of the immutable Jehovah. If His priesthood
could be revoked, and His authority removed, it would be the end of all hope
and life for the people whom He loves; but this sure rock is the basis of
our security -- the oath of God establishes our glorious Lord both in His
priesthood and in His throne. It is the Lord Who has constituted Him a
priest for ever, He has done it by oath, that oath is without repentance, is
taking effect now, and will stand throughout all ages: hence our security in
Him is placed beyond all question.
The declaration runs in the present tense as being the only time with the
Lord, and comprehending all other times. "Thou art," i.e., Thou wast and art
and art to come, in all ages a priestly King.
The order of Melchizedek's priesthood was the most ancient and primitive,
the most free from ritual and ceremony, the most natural and simple, and at
the same time the most honourable. That ancient patriarch was the father of
his people, and at the same time ruled and taught them; he swayed both the
sceptre and the censer, reigned in righteousness, and offered sacrifice
before the Lord. There has never arisen another like to him since his days,
for whenever the kings of Judah attempted to seize the sacerdotal office
they were driven back to their confusion: God would have no king priest save
His son. Melchizedek's office was exceptional -- none preceded or succeeded
him; he comes upon the page of history mysteriously; no pedigree is given,
no date of birth, or mention of death; he blesses Abraham, receives tithe
and vanishes from the scene amid honours which show that he was greater than
the founder of the chosen nation. He is seen but once, and that once
suffices.
Aaron and his seed came and went; their imperfect sacrifice continued for
many generations, because it had no finality in it, and could never make the
comers thereunto perfect.
Our Lord Jesus, like Melchizedek, stands forth before us as a Priest of
divine ordaining; not made a priest by fleshly birth, as the sons of Aaron:
He mentions neither father, mother, nor descent, as His right to the sacred
office; He stands upon His personal merits, by Himself alone; as no man came
before Him in his work, so none can follow after; His order begins and ends
in His own person, and in Himself it is eternal,
"having neither beginning of days nor end of years The King Priest has been
here and left his blessing upon the believing, and now he sits in glory in
his complete character, stoning for us by the merit of his blood, and
exercising all power on our behalf."
"O may we ever
hear thy voice
In mercy to us speak,
And in our Priest we will rejoice,
Thou great Melchizedek."
The last verses of this psalm we understand to refer to the future victories
of the Priest King. He shall not forever sit in waiting posture, but shall
come into the fight to end the weary war by His own victorious presence. He
will lead the final charge in person; His own right hand and His holy arm
shall get unto Him the victory.
|
|
DOWNLOAD
InstaVerse
for free. It is an easy to
install and simple to use Bible Verse pop up tool that allows you to read
cross references
in context and in the Version you prefer. Only the KJV is free with
this download but you can also download a free copy of
Bible Explorer
which in turn offers
free Bibles
that work with
InstaVerse,
including the excellent, literal translation, the English Standard Version
(ESV). Other popular versions are available for purchase. When you
hold the mouse pointer over a Scripture reference anywhere on the Web (as
well as offline in Word for Windows, email, etc) the passage pops up
immediately.
InstaVerse
can be disabled if the
popups become distractive. This utility really does work and makes it easy
to read the actual passage in context and not just the chapter and verse
reference. |
|