BUT FALSE PROPHETS ALSO AROSE AMONG THE PEOPLE: Egenonto (3PAMI) de kai pseudoprophetai en to lao: (Dt 13:1, 2; 13:3 1Ki 18:19, 20, 21, 22; 22:6; Neh 6:12, 13, 14; Isa 9:15; 56:10,11; Jer 6:13, Jer 14:13, 14, 15; 23:16,17,25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32; [Read esp Jer 23:9-32] Jer 27:14,15; 28:15, 16, 17; 29:8,9; 29:31,32 37:19; Lam 2:14; Ezek 13:3-18; Hos 9:8; Mic 2:11; 3:5,11; Zech 13:3,4; Mt 7:15; Lk 6:26; Ro 16:18) (See the book of Jude for parallel on false teachers - Jude 1:1, 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15; 16; 17; 18; 19; 20; 21; 22; 23; 24; 25)

Paul Apple introduces this next section with a pithy question...

What does a Pigpen smell like?

Matt. 7:15-23 important to examine the fruit
Matt. 13:24-30,36-43 the enemy is busy sowing tares among the Christian churches.

Why does Peter feel that it is necessary to warn his readers about false teachers? (cf. similar message in Jude - see above)

Historical Context: time of the apostles is fading; it has been over 30 years since the ascension of Christ; false teachers have crept into the church and are gaining momentum; Peter wants to go on record on these issues before he is gone

cf. Battle for the Bible by Harold Lindsell -- deals mainly with issues of inerrancy and with the trend toward apostasy in major mainline denominations and seminaries; no wonder that the people are being taught error when you look at what the seminary professors no longer believe

cf. the battle back in the 1920s with Modernism; a series of books called the The Fundamentals was published

cf. illustration regarding roommate of R. C. Sproul who went before the examining board on his oral exam and did not tell them where he was waffling so that he could get his diploma; he ended up on the board that was asking the questions of R. C. Sproul! (Reference)

BUT (de) draws a dramatic contrast between God's true prophets who under the influence of Holy Spirit wrote the inerrant OT Scriptures (2Pe 1:21-note) and the pernicious pseudo prophets who were nicely summed up by the true prophet Jeremiah  (Lamentations 2:14)

Your prophets have seen for you false and foolish visions & they have not exposed your iniquity so as to restore you from captivity, but they have seen for you false and misleading oracles."

Note that their teaching failed to bring about holiness and freedom as Peter amplifies in the remainder of this chapter. Notice also their effect on those they deceive

The prophets prophesy falsely, & the priests rule on their own authority & My people love it so!..." (Jer 5:31)

How to Discern a False Prophet
Deuteronomy 13:1-5, 18:20-22

"If a prophet or a dreamer of dreams arises among you and gives you a sign or a wonder, and the sign or the wonder comes true, concerning which he spoke to you, saying, 'Let us go after other gods whom you have not known and let us serve them,' you shall not listen to the words of that prophet or that dreamer of dreams; for the LORD your God is testing you to find out if you love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul. "You shall follow the LORD your God and fear Him; and you shall keep His commandments, listen to His voice, serve Him, and cling to Him. But that prophet or that dreamer of dreams shall be put to death, because he has counseled rebellion against the LORD your God who brought you from the land of Egypt and redeemed you from the house of slavery, to seduce you from the way in which the LORD your God commanded you to walk. So you shall purge the evil from among you. (Deut 13:1-5)

But the prophet who speaks a word presumptuously in My name which I have not commanded him to speak, or which he speaks in the name of other gods, that prophet shall die. "You may say in your heart, 'How will we know the word which the LORD has not spoken?' "When a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the thing does not come about or come true, that is the thing which the LORD has not spoken. The prophet has spoken it presumptuously; you shall not be afraid of him' (Deut 18:20-22)

False prophets (5578) (pseudoprophetes) are men who falsely claim to be prophets of God and/or who prophesy falsely. They utter falsehoods under the name of divine prophecies. Such men falsely assume the work of a prophet when pretending to foretell things to come (Mt. 24:11, 24) or they teach false doctrines in the name of God (Mt 7:15 [note], Lk 6:26, Acts 13:6, 2Co 11:13, 1Jn 4:1; Revelation 16:13 [note]; Revelation 19:20 [note], used in Septuagint of Jer 6:13) Wherever important truth is at stake these counterfeits will offer their wares. In the Old Testament men claimed to speak from God when he had not sent them (Dt 18:20) Satan’s counterfeits with their insidious activities have always been present and will be especially prevalent during the time just before Jesus makes His triumphant return (Mt. 24:11, 24). Peter warns the saints stabilized by the truth in Chapter 1 to be alert to the false in Chapter 2.

Arthur Pink says

False prophets are to be found in the circles of the most orthodox, and they pretend to have a fervent love for souls, yet they fatally delude multitudes concerning the way of salvation. The pulpit, platform, and pamphlet hucksters have wantonly lowered the standard of divine holiness and so adulterated the Gospel in order to make it palatable to the carnal mind.”

John Piper

Chapter one is mainly an encouragement to avail ourselves of God's power to lead lives of godliness and love. Chapter two is mainly a warning against the destruction that will befall those who don't avail themselves of this power. If chapter one is the carrot, chapter two is the crack of the whip over our heads. There are no commands, no admonitions, no imperatives in chapter two; just pure, terrifying description of what will happen to those who fall prey to the false teachers in the church." (See full sermon Destruction Is not Sleeping)

Among the people (en to lao) refers to these false prophets arising in Israel as distinct from the Gentile world. Where God's truth is presence the counterfeit is not far behind. 

Hiebert quoting Anstadt observes that

The transition to this new subject is natural. "When the fortifications have been built, and the armor has been put on, and the weapons have been provided, then it is time to meet the enemy (ref)

False Prophets

Pretended to be sent by God -Jeremiah 23:17,18,31
Not sent or commissioned by God - Jeremiah 14:14; 23:21; 29:31
Made use of by God to prove Israel -Deuteronomy 13:3

DESCRIBED AS
Light and treacherous -Zephaniah 3:4
Covetous -Micah 3:11
Crafty -Matthew 7:15
Drunken -Isaiah 28:7
Immoral and profane -Jeremiah 23:11,14

Women sometimes acted as -Nehemiah 6:14; Revelation 2:20

Called foolish prophets -Ezekiel 13:2

Compared to foxes in the desert -Ezekiel 13:4

Compared to wind -Jeremiah 5:13

Influenced by evil spirits -1 Kings 22:21,22

PROPHESIED
Falsely -Jeremiah 5:31
Lies in the name of the Lord -Jeremiah 14:14
Out of their own heart -Jeremiah 23:16,26; Ezekiel 13:2
In the name of false gods -Jeremiah 2:8
Peace, when there was no peace -Jeremiah 6:14; 23:17; Ezekiel 13:10; Micah 3:5

Often practiced divination and witchcraft -Jeremiah 14:14; Ezekiel 22:28; Acts 13:6

Often pretended to dreams -Jeremiah 23:28,32

Often deceived by God as a judgment -Ezekiel 14:9

THE PEOPLE
Led into error -Jeremiah 23:13; Micah 3:5
Made to forget God’s name by -Jeremiah 23:27
Deprived of God’s word by -Jeremiah 23:30
Taught profaneness and sin by -Jeremiah 23:14,15
Oppressed and defrauded by -Ezekiel 22:25
Warned not to listen to -Deuteronomy 13:3; Jeremiah 23:16; 27:9,15,16
Encouraged and praised -Jeremiah 5:31; Luke 6:26
Mode of trying and detecting -Deuteronomy 13:1,2; 18:21,22; 1John 4:1-3

PREDICTED TO ARISE
Before destruction of Jerusalem -Matthew 24:11,24
In the latter times -2 Peter 2:1
Judgments denounced against -Jeremiah 8:1,2; 14:15; 28:16,17; 29:32
Involved the people in their own ruin -Isaiah 9:15,16; Jeremiah 20:6; Ezekiel 14:10

JUST AS THERE WILL ALSO BE FALSE TEACHERS AMONG YOU: os kai en humin esontai (3PFMI) pseudodidaskaloi: (Mt 24:5,11,24; Mk 13:22; Lk 21:8; Acts 20:29,30; 1Cor 11:19; 2Cor 11:13-14; 2Cor 11:15 Gal 2:4, Gal 4:17; Eph 4:14; Col 2:8; 2:18; 2Thes 2:3-12; 1Ti 4:1-3; 2Ti 3:1-9; 4:3; Titus 1:11; 1Jn 2:18; 2:19 2:26 4:1; Jude 1:18; Rev 2:9; 13:14)

False Teachers (5572) (pseudodidaskalos from pseudes = untrue, deceitful, lying, wicked + didaskalos = Instructor, master, teacher = one who provides instruction) means literally false teachers or in this context those who parade themselves as Christian teachers, pastors, evangelists, etc, but who teach false doctrine. They are the antithesis of the apostles, teaching a false message of human invention rather than the apostolic message based on divinely inspired words. The root word didasko is interesting because it means to teach so as to shape the will of the one being taught by the content of taught.

As Peter illustrates in this chapter, this is exactly the modus operandi of these evil men who traffic in lies and deceit just like their father the devil (Jn 8:44). They use deadly doctrines to shape the will of the unsuspecting "sheep". The term for false teachers in unique to Peter and could refer to either those whose claim to be teachers is false because they have not been authorized as teachers in the Church or it could refer to those who were teaching what is false or perverse. Probably the term encompasses both ideas. The context suggest that they do not claim to present a new revelation from God (like a false prophet might do) but rather offer their teachings as accredited and authentic truth.

Rob Salvato...

when it comes to the Church today there are some who feed their flocks what amounts to spiritual Ice Cream Cake & candy – (A) Feel good sermons – whose aim is to make people feel happy / to help them feel good about themselves. (B) Sermons where people are never CONVICTED / CONFRONTED or CHALLENGED –  (1) Although the Congregation is Happy – not Healthy  (C) Then there are other “Spiritual leaders or Movements” Who feed their Congregations or followers – what amounts to Poison (1) Causing their Congregations to never come to life / but remaining dead in their Sins (Sermon)
 

W. A. Criswell defines a "false teacher" as...

a suave, affable, personable, scholarly man who claims to be the friend of Christ. He preaches in the pulpit, he writes learned books, he publishes articles in the religious magazines. He attacks Christianity from within. He makes the church and the school a lodging place for every unclean and hateful bird. He leavens the meal with the doctrine of the Sadducees." (Criswell, W A. Believer's Study Bible: New King James Version. 1991. Thomas Nelson)

Among you (en humin) is more literally "in your midst" which clearly indicates these deceivers will infiltrate and intermingle with God's saints. The point is clear "among" indicates this is an "inside" job so to speak, just as Paul had warned the Ephesian elders would occur upon his departure.

MacDonald adds that

These false teachers take their place inside the church. They pose as ministers of the gospel. This is what makes the peril so great. If they came right out and said they were atheists or agnostics, people would be on guard. But they are masters of deception. They carry the Bible and use orthodox expressions —though using them to mean something entirely different. The president of a liberal theological seminary acknowledged the strategy as follows: '"Churches often change convictions without formally renouncing views to which they were previously committed, and their theologians usually find ways of preserving continuity with the past through re-interpretations. (MacDonald, W & Farstad, A. Believer's Bible Commentary: Thomas Nelson or Logos)

Paul gives a similar warning to the elders of the church at Ephesus, declaring...

For I did not shrink from declaring to you the whole purpose of God. Be on guard for yourselves and for all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood. I know that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock & from among your own selves men will arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after them. Therefore be on the alert, remembering that night and day for a period of three years I did not cease to admonish each one with tears. And now I commend you to God and to the word of His grace, which is able to build you up and to give you the inheritance among all those who are sanctified. (Acts 20:27-32)

Daniel Defoe (of Robinson Crusoe fame) wrote

Whenever God erects a house of prayer, the Devil always builds a chapel there.

The point is that whenever the true work of God is found it is not long before satanic counterfeits began to infiltrate.

WHO WILL SECRETLY INTRODUCE: hoitines pareisaxousin (3PFAI):

Apple...

they come in secretly with a hidden agenda; they smile and sign your doctrinal statement and profess to agree with you; then they have opportunity to teach; then they start to sneak in their false doctrine in subtle ways (2 Peter Commentary Notes)

Secretly introduce (3919) (pareisago from pará = unto or at the side of + eiságo = bring in, introduce) means to bring in by the side of (secretly and craftily), introduce surreptitiously (the root derivation of surreptitious means to "secretly snatch") or bring in under false pretenses. The metaphor (picture) is of spies or traitors stealthily introducing themselves into an enemy’s camp.

Lenski says that the full force of the verb means to bring in

sneakingly, covertly, so that unwary, simple people will not note what these teachers are bringing in.

These false teachers will present a clever, even catchy attractive message in which they will secretly introduce error alongside of the truth. The majority of their message is orthodox but the small percentage of doctrinal "poison" is enough to bring about destruction of souls.

Rob Salvato...

Word Secret is Subtle – a subtle deception – The right terminology is used but in the wrong way. They will talk about Jesus and talk about God – they will show up at your door mentioning things like Salvation and end times. The point is that their terminology is correct but the way it is used is wrong. It is interesting to note that most members of cult groups used to belong to an Evangelical or Christian Church! (Ed: What's wrong with that picture?) (Sermon)

Calvin adds a picturesque thought that these men

creep in by oblique turnings, as through burrows under ground.

Paul used the related noun form of pareisago (pareisaktos) when he warned the Galatian church about the

false brethren secretly brought in (pareisaktos) who had sneaked in (pareiserchomai from para = alongside + eiserchomai = to enter) to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, in order to bring us into bondage." (Gal 2:4) 

Note again the effect of false doctrine...bondage not freedom.

Jude had a similar warning

For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, (pareisduno from para = alongside + eisdúo = enter in) those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ. (Jude 1:4)

How do we detect their subtle seduction? Here's an illustration...

A Chinese boy who wanted to learn about jade went to study with a talented old teacher. This gentle man put a piece of the precious stone into his hand and told him to hold it tight. Then he began to talk of philosophy, men, women, the sun and almost everything under it. After an hour he took the stone and sent the boy home. The procedure was repeated for several weeks. The boy became frustrated. When would he be told about the jade? He was too polite, however, to question the wisdom of his venerable teacher. Then one day, when the old man put a stone into his hands, the boy cried out instinctively, “That’s not jade!” - Haddon Robinson, Biblical Preaching

Guglielmo commenting on this illustration says...

I truly believe that is why the so-called Christian movements take people away from God’s Word or bring them to a translation of the Bible that does not follow what the Greek or Hebrew text is saying. By dumbing people down regarding the Bible, you can get them to believe anything and that is what we are seeing today! (The Emerging Church)

DESTRUCTIVE HERESIES: haireseis apoleias :

Destructive heresies - Literally heresies of destruction, the product of the heresies being destruction.

Leighton calls us to...

Note carefully that heresy in the New Testament implies false conduct and not erroneous opinion only. The root idea is that of choice, indicating deliberate and willful severance from right thought and righteous paths. (Leighton, R., & Thomas, G.  1, 2 Peter. The Crossway classic commentaries. Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books)

Adam Clarke...

Damnable heresies - Heresies of destruction; such as, if followed, would lead a man to perdition.  And these they will bring in privately-cunningly (pareisago), without making much noise, and as covertly as possible. It would be better to translate destructive heresies than damnable.

Destructive (684) (apoleia [word studies] from apo = marker of separation, away from + olethros = ruin, death but not annihilation) refers to destruction of persons, objects, or institutions. The "doctrine" of these false teachers is potentially deadly as pictured by this word (apoleia) which ultimately pictures separation from God, an utter, hopeless ruin & loss of well-being and all that gives worth to existence. Out of the 18 NT uses of apoleia 5 occur in this short epistle (2Pe 2:1 twice; 2Pe 2:3; 3:7,16) and refer primarily to eschatological (theology concerned with the final events in the history of the world) judgment which does not mean extinction but ruination, not loss of being but loss of well being.

Apoleia - 18x in 17v - Mt 7:13; 26:8; Mk 14:4; Jn 17:12; Acts 8:20; Ro 9:22; Php 1:28; 3:19; 2Th 2:3; 1Ti 6:9; Heb 10:39; 2Pe 2:1, 3; 3:7, 16; Rev 17:8, 11. NAS = destruction(13), destructive(1), perdition(1), perish(1), waste(1), wasted(1).

Heresies (139) (hairesis from haireo = to choose or select) means primarily a choice so originally hairesis did not initially convey an evil connotation. The root word means to choose and so hairesis was used for a philosopher’s school of followers or for any band of people who chose to follow him because they shared his beliefs. Hairesis primarily meant a  choosing and then that which is chosen or an opinion with the implication that it is a deliberate self-chosen opinion. Because the views espoused were frequently substitutes for the truth, the term came to denote erroneous or heretical teachings.

Hairesis - 9x in 9v - Acts 5:17; 15:5; 24:5, 14; 26:5; 28:22; 1 Cor 11:19; Gal 5:20; 2 Pet 2:1. NAS =  factions(2), heresies(1), sect(6).

Heresies then are self-designed religious lies which lead to division and faction (cf. 1Cor 11:19; Gal 5:20). The tragedy of life is that people who hold different views very often finish up by disliking, not each others’ views, but each other. It should be possible to differ with a man and yet remain friends.

These false teachers taught heresies of destruction forcing the unwary to make choices that led away from the Light and into Darkness, Death & Damnation.

Heresies came to mean sect, party like Pharisees or Sadducees. Promoting a party spirit in a church is one of the works of the flesh (Gal 5:20). Whenever a church member says to another member, “Are you on my side or the pastor’s side?” he is promoting a party spirit and causing division. A false teacher forces you to make a choice between his doctrines and the doctrines of the true Christian faith. These false teachers brought in their self-chosen teachings that altered the sound doctrinal foundation of Christianity and so threatened to destroy the body of Christ.

EVEN DENYING: kai...arnoumenoi (PMPMPN): (Mt 10:33; Lk 12:9; Acts 3:13; 14; 2Ti 2:12,13; Jude 1:4; Rev 2:13; 3:8)

Denying  (720) (arneomai [word study]) means to say one does not know about or is in any way related to a person or event. The present tense indicates that this denial was not a solitary or momentary denial but a continual repudiation of the claims of the Master upon them. Peter's point is that they do not belong to the Master. They are not individuals who believe in Christ and are saved.

To deny carries idea of conscious, purposeful action of the will. These false teachers deny the Master and thus deny the deity of Jesus Christ, and if they do away with His deity they destroy the entire body of Christian truth for if Christ is not Who He claimed to be, there is no Christian faith.

Deny is a significant word coming from Peter for His Lord had forewarned him

Truly I say to you that this very night, before a rooster crows, you will deny Me three times." which is exactly what he did (Mt 26:34, 35,70, 75)  

Peter knew, by bitter repentance, what a fearful thing it is to deny the Lord (Lk 22:61, 62). Peter's denial was a momentary lapse, wholly different from the persistent damning denial of the Master by the false teachers for as Jesus taught

whoever denies Me before men, I will also deny him before My Father who is in heaven. (Mt 10:33)

DENIAL OF CHRIST
Torrey's Topic

In doctrine -Mark 8:38; 2 Timothy 1:8

In practice -Philippians 3:18,10; Titus 1:16

A characteristic of false teachers -2Peter 2:1; Jude 1:4

Is the spirit of Antichrist -1John 2:22,23; 4:3

Christ will deny those guilty of -Matthew 10:33; 2Timothy 2:12

Leads to destruction -2Peter 2:1; Jude 1:4,15

Exemplified
Peter -Matthew 26:69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75
The Jews -John 18:40; Acts 3:13,14

THE MASTER: autous despoten:

Master (1203)  (despotes [word study]; English = despot =  often conveys a bad connotation but not so in this use by Peter) originally indicated absolute, unrestricted authority, whether human authority or divine authority, so that the Greeks refused the title to any but the gods. The despotes is the undisputed Owner.

In NT despotes and kurios are used interchangeably of God and of the master of the house who exercises full authority over his family and household servants.

Despotes - 10x in 10v - Luke 2:29; Acts 4:24; 1 Tim 6:1f; 2 Tim 2:21; Titus 2:9; 1 Pet 2:18; 2 Pet 2:1; Jude 1:4; Rev 6:10. NAS = Lord(3), Master(3), masters(4).

Despotes is the One Who alone has supreme authority and in the present context implies a master-servant relationship, based on the fact that they were bought by the Master to be His own servants.

How do they "deny" Him? Given the description of these men that follows in this chapter, I like John Calvin's thoughts on their mode of denial.

Calvin writes that...

Though Christ may be denied in various ways, yet Peter, as I think, refers here to what is expressed by Jude, that is, when the grace of God is turned into lasciviousness; for Christ redeemed us, that He might have a people separated from all the pollutions of the world, and devoted to holiness ,and innocency. They, then, who throw off the bridle, and give themselves up to all kinds of licentiousness, are not unjustly said to deny Christ by Whom they have been redeemed. Hence, that the doctrine of the gospel may remain whole and complete among us, let this be fixed in our minds, that we have been redeemed by Christ, that He may be the Lord of our life and of our death, and that our main object ought to be, to live to Him and to die to Him."

John MacArthur agrees adding that

Though their heresies may include the denial of the virgin birth, deity, bodily resurrection, and second coming of Christ, the false teachers’ basic error is that they will not submit their lives to the rule of Christ. All false religions have an erroneous Christology." (bolding added) (MacArthur, J.: The MacArthur Study Bible Nashville: Word or Logos)

WHO BOUGHT THEM: kai ton agorasanta (AAPMSA): (Dt 32:6; Acts 20:28; 1Cor 6:19, 20; 7:23; Gal 3:13; Eph 1:7; Heb 10:29; 1Pet 1:8; Rev 5:9)  

Bought (59) (agorazo [word study] from agora = the market place, place of public assembly, town square where things such as slaves were presented for sale or where trials were held) literally means to buy in the marketplace, doing business in the agora (Mt 13:44), acquiring something (goods or services) in exchange for money. It meant to secure the rights to someone by paying a price and thus acquiring them as one's property (as here in 2Pe 2:1-note - used this way also in 1Co 6:20 and 1Co 7:23). All of the uses of agorazo in the Gospels refer to literal buying and selling (see Mt 13:44, 46; 14:15; 21:12; 25:9f; 27:7; Mark 6:36, 37; 11:15; 15:46; 16:1; Luke 9:13; 14:18, 19; 17:28; 19:45; 22:36; Jn 4:8; 6:5; 13:29).

Agorazo emphasizes the market imagery of purchasing goods. In such an exchange, the goods are "set free" from the seller (the previous owner), usually to be possessed by the purchaser.

When Peter speaks of being bought or ransomed by Christ, he is picturing us as slaves of sin and Satan and of being purchased and made free from sin to serve Christ and glorify God. See study on Kinsman-Redeemer or Goel.

Jesus' "mission" in coming to earth was specifically to "give His life a ransom for ( = idea of as a substitute) many." (Mark 10:45) and to pay the price to set men free from enslavement to the power of their old sin nature inherited from Adam. In this case the purchase price was the "precious blood, as of a lamb unblemished and spotless, the blood of Christ" (1Pe1:18,19-note)

True believers understand and willingly confess that they...

are not (their) own" but that they "have been bought with a price (1Cor 6:19-note, 1Co 6:20-note)

In contrast, these false teachers continue to deny Christ.

Leighton...

How solemn is the thought that these men were fighting against the divine purchase of redemption. In the New Testament sense of the word, heresy is always a denial of Christ, for it is the determination to go our own way and to set at nought his personal work and authority. (Leighton, R., & Thomas, G.  1, 2 Peter. The Crossway classic commentaries. Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books)

Wuest comments that...

The word in classical use meant “to purchase in the market place,” and was used of the purchase of slaves in the slave-market. Our Lord’s precious, outpoured blood was the ransom paid to redeem slaves of sin from that slavery. His death satisfied the just demands of the High Court of Heaven, paying the penalty for the sinner, and making a way whereby a righteous God could be just and at the same time the justifier of the believing sinner. Strachan says: “The denial seems to have consisted in an inadequate view of the Person and Work of Christ, and their relation to the problem of human sin.” Of course, such a person is unsaved. We make this point here in order that when we approach the subject matter dealing with the utter destruction of these false teachers, we may he guided by our context. These are not misguided Christians, but heretics. (Wuest, K. S. Wuest's Word Studies from the Greek New Testament: Eerdmans or Logos)

John Piper adds an interesting comment that...

the context in 1 Corinthians...has to do with sexual morality (1Cor 6:19-note, 1Co 6:20-note). To be bought by Christ is to be freed from the domination of sexual passions that drive one into sexual preoccupations and illicit sexual intercourse. We belong to a new Master Whose promises are so superior to the promises of sex that (as 2Pe 1:4 [note] says) we can escape from the lordship of passion. When this happens we exalt Christ and affirm His worth. But if we live in the grip of sexual domination we belittle Christ and "deny the Master Who bought us." (Destruction Is Not Sleeping)

Christ's sacrificial death was applicable to all men but efficacious only for those who willingly, readily accept this gift like a beggar would a gratuitous handout (He would simply hold out his hand and accept the gratuity).  Christ's death provided for

the propitiation (satisfactory payment) for...sins...of the whole world" (1Jn 2:2, cf 1Ti 2:6, Heb 2:9-note)

By making satisfactory payment, Christ made salvation available to all men. This "satisfactory payment" is only made effective in the hearts of those exercising a living, obedient faith in their Master and Redeemer. In fairness it should be noted that not all evangelicals agree with the statement I just made, which reflects what they would refer to as "unlimited atonement". Their view by contrast is referred to as "limited atonement", a view I do not espouse. A detailed discussion of these views is beyond the scope and intent of these notes. (

We all owed a debt we could never pay. He paid a debt He did not owe! Christ freed us from our our debt, our sin liability (its wages = death and payment necessitates a death, in this case Christ's substitutionary death.)

Christ’s death is sufficient for all, but is efficient only for those who believe.

Peter is asserting that Christ bought the potential for salvation even for these false teachers, but they were not saved as is clearly indicated by their habitual, continuous (present tense) repudiation of Christ their Master. In other words, their price for redemption had been paid in full (Jn 19:30) but they had not received the Redeemer (cp Jn 1:11) by grace through faith (Ep 2:8, 9-note) and therefore were still dead in their trespasses and sins (Ep 2:1-note).

As discussed briefly above, this section is a strong argument for what is known theologically as unlimited atonement (the view that Christ died for everyone, even for these unsaved false teachers) and against limited atonement (the view that Christ died only for those whom He would later save). It should be noted that although I have presented the interpretation that this section of Scripture (et al) supports unlimited atonement, if you stoutly hold to the "Reformed tradition" you will doubtless take umbrage with my view and I certainly am not offended. It is beyond the scope of these notes to address this doctrine in depth. I would refer you to a Scripturally based discussion from a noted Christian apologist, Ron Rhodes (See The Case for Unlimited Atonement by Ron Rhodes or A Defense of Unlimited Atonement by George Zeller))

BRINGING SWIFT DESTRUCTION: epagontes (PAPMPN) heautois tachinen apoleian: (2Peter 2:3; Mal 3:5; Php 3:19)

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown comment that

Man brings upon himself the vengeance which God brings upon him."

God will not long tolerate willful rebellion. Peter delineates the definitive doom due denying deceivers.

Bringing (1863) (epago) means to bring something upon someone. This verb is in the present tense indicating that these false teacher's persistent denial of the Master initiated a process that ultimately and surely would culminate in their utter swift (tachinos = speedy, impending) ruin, a ruin which includes loss of eternal life, eternal misery, loss of well being, loss of purpose for which they were created and worst of all exclusion from the Kingdom and presence of the Living and True God.

Swift (5031) (tachinos) means near at hand or impending and thus emphasizes the fact that this destruction is coming soon (its imminent - the idea of imminent is that it could happen at any time).

Destruction (684) (apoleia [word studies] from apo = marker of separation, away from + olethros = ruin, death but not annihilation) refers to destruction of persons, objects, or institutions.

Swift destruction paints a haunting picture, even as the ground literally swallowed up rebellious Korah and Dathan and...

they went down quick into the pit.” (Nu 16:30 KJV)

This is a serious warning for any false teacher. (cf Pr 29:1, 2Th 1:7, 8, 9, 10)

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown add this note of tragic irony