1 Peter 3:5-7

 

 

Home
Site Index
Inductive Bible Study
Greek Word Studies
Commentaries by Verse
Area Precept Classes
Reference Search
Bible Dictionaries
Bible Maps & Pictures
It's Greek to Me
Bible Commentaries
Discipline Yourself
Christian Biography
Wailing Wall
Bible Prophecy

Search by Verse
Word or Phrase:

 

 

Study Tools

 
 

INDEX
PREVIOUS NEXT

COLLECTIONS
Commentaries, Word Studies, Devotionals, Sermons, Illustrations
Old and New Testament.

   
  

   

 

Search Every Word on Preceptaustin
PicoSearch
    Help

 

1 Peter 3:5  For in this way in former times the holy women also, who hoped in God, used to adorn themselves, being submissive to their own husbands; (NASB: Lockman)

Greek: houtos gar pote kai ai hagia gunaikes ai elpizousai (PAPFPN) eis theon ekosmoun (3PIAI) heautas hupotassomenai (PPPFPN) tois idiois andrasin, 
Amplified: For it was thus that the pious women of old who hoped in God were [accustomed] to beautify themselves and were submissive to their husbands [adapting themselves to them as themselves secondary and dependent upon them].
 (Amplified Bible - Lockman)
NLT: That is the way the holy women of old made themselves beautiful. They trusted God and accepted the authority of their husbands. (
NLT - Tyndale House)
Phillips:  This was the secret of the beauty of the holy women of ancient times who trusted in God and were submissive to their husbands.  (
Phillips: Touchstone)
Wuest: For thus formerly also the holy women, the ones whose hope is directed to and rests in God, were accustomed to adorn themselves, putting themselves in subjection with implicit obedience to their own husbands, (
Erdmans
Young's Literal:  for thus once also the holy women who did hope on God, were adorning themselves, being subject to their own husbands,

References 1 Peter

Paul Apple
Albert Barnes
Brian Bell
John Calvin
Rich Cathers
Steven Cole
Steven Cole
Thomas Constable
Ron Daniels
Bob Deffinbaugh
Dwight Edwards
Doug Goins
David Guzik
John MacArthur
John MacArthur
John Piper
John Piper
John Piper
John Piper
Ray Pritchard
Ray Pritchard
Ron Ritchie
Grant Richison
Grant Richison
A T Robertson
Dave Roper
C H Spurgeon
Marvin Vincent
Illustrations
Precept Ministries

1 Peter Commentary in Pdf
1 Peter 3
1 Peter 3:1 -7
1 Peter 3
1 Peter 3-5
1 Peter 3:1-6
1 Peter 3:7
1 Peter
1 Peter 2:11-3:7 Submission To Authority

1 Peter 2:13-3:7: 2nd Look at Submission  
1 Peter: Exposition by Verse
1 Peter 3:8-18: Survival And Suffering
1 Peter 3

1 Peter 3:1-7: How to Win Your Unsaved Spouse 

1 Peter 3:1-7: How to Win Your Unbelieving Spouse

1 Peter 3:1-6: Holy Women Who Hoped in God

1 Peter 3:1-7: Husbands Who Love Like Christ

1 Peter 3:1-7: Women of Valor

1 Peter 3:7: That Prayers may not be hindered
1 Peter 3:1-6 Inner Beauty
1 Peter 3:7 Unhindered Prayers
1 Peter 3:1-12 How Can We Maintain Our Marriage
1 Peter 3:5 3:5b 3:6 3:6b 3:7 3:7b 3:7c
1 Peter 3:7d 3:7e 3:7f 3:7g 3:7h 3:7i 3:7j
1 Peter 3: Greek Word Pictures
1 Peter 3:1-7: Healing a Hurting Marriage

1 Peter 3:7 Hindrances to Prayer - Pdf
1 Peter 3: Word Studies in NT
1 Peter 3:7: Opening the Door
1 Peter: Download lesson 1 of 12

FOR IN THIS WAY IN FORMER TIMES THE HOLY WOMEN ALSO: houtos gar pote kai ai hagiai gunaikes ai:  (Pr 31:10,30; Lu 8:2,3; Acts 1:14; 9:36; 1 Ti 2:10; 5:10; Titus 2:3,4)

Holy women is not a unique class of OT women, but as explained in the note directly below they were ordinary sinners saved by grace.

Spurgeon writes  -

It has been one of the most beautiful results of the spread of the Christian religion that it has uplifted womanhood; so that now, instead of women being, as they were, and still are where the gospel is not received, the slaves of their husbands, Christianity has taught that honor should be given to the wife. If there are any husbands who do not so, they err from the gospel way. (1 Peter 3 Commentary)

Holy (40) (hagios) (Click for study of hagios) literally means “set-apart ones.” These women lived holy lives because they lived separated lives, separated from the world out from which God had saved them. If these wives lived holy lives, it can be done in the amoral agnostic days in which we are living.

WHO HOPED IN GOD: elpizousai (PAPFPN) eis theon: (1 Sa 2:1; Jer 49:11; Lu 2:37; 1 Ti 2:15; 5:5; Heb 11:11)

Hoped (1679) (elpizo from elpis) (see study of Believer's Blessed Hope) means to look forward with confidence to that which is good and beneficial. It means to to anticipate, usually with pleasure, expecting some benefit. The word does not mean "I hope so". This hope reflects an absolute certainty of future good. The present tense indicates hope was the habitual practice.

These women had learned to preach to themselves the way the psalmist did 

Why are you in despair, O my soul? And why have you become disturbed within me? Hope in God, for I shall again praise Him For the help of His presence. (Ps 42:5) (Comment: Spurgeon writes the following regarding hope...Hope thou in God. If every evil be let loose from Pandora's box, yet is there hope at the bottom. This is the grace that swims, though the waves roar and be troubled. God is unchangeable, and therefore His grace is the ground for unshaken hope. If everything be dark, yet the day will come, and meanwhile hope carries stars in her eyes; her lamps are not dependent on oil from without, her light is fed by secret visitations of God, which sustain the spirit.)

Women who hope in God are women who look away from the troubles and miseries and obstacles of life that seem to make the future bleak, and they focus their attention on the sovereign power and love of God Who rules in heaven and does on earth whatever He pleases and Who alone can make the statement which He made to Sarah...

"Is anything too difficult for the LORD? At the appointed time I will return to you, at this time next year, and Sarah shall have a son."" (Ge18:14) [cf "Behold, I am the LORD, the God of all flesh; is anything too difficult for Me?" Jer 32:27]

Women who hoped in God - remembering that Hebrews 11:1 (note) teaches us that "faith = assurance of things hoped for",  were undoubtedly women who were declared righteous in God's sight (by faith) apart from their works. In the context of this section of Peter he is referring to the woman as the one who is saved and whose behavior can win her husband to Christ. So in using the example of the OT women, Peter is certainly implying that they were genuinely saved and the phrase "hoped in God" supports this observation. Biblical hope is not our modern day flighty definition of "maybe so" but it is an absolute assurance of future good. So when they hoped in God, God reckoned (imputed) it to them His righteousness. They were justified (declared righteous) by faith.

USED TO ADORN THEMSELVES: ekosmoun (3PIAI) heautas:

Adorn (2885) (kosmeo) (Click for study of kosmeo) means to cause something to be beautiful by decorating it. Here it refers to the correctness of a well-fitted garment, in no way outlandish or provocative. Christian wives are to dress themselves in good taste and appropriate to the occasion.

Kosmeo is the source of our English word "cosmetic" and is in the imperfect tense which speaks of action going on in past time. These "holy women" were accustomed to adorn themselves in that manner. It was a habit of life with them to adorn themselves with a meek and quiet spirit, not with the latest fad of the world.

BEING SUBMISSIVE TO THEIR OWN HUSBANDS: hupotassomenai (PPPFPN) tois idiois andrasin:

Peter repeats (see note 1 Peter 3:1)  the idea of a godly wife's submission to her husband. Godly women of the OT adorned themselves by cultivating the moral and spiritual beauty of the inner life. One aspect of this beauty was a dutiful submission to their own husbands.

Being submissive (5293) (hupotasso= hupo = under + tasso = arrange in an orderly manner) (Click word study of hupotasso) (Click the 6 uses of hupotasso in 1Peter) in the passive voice means to submit oneself, to subordinate oneself, to obey, to place oneself under, to put oneself under orders, to align oneself under the authority of another.

The use of the present tense indicates this is to be the wife's habitual practice or lifestyle, a lifestyle of continually submitting to her husband. Notice the little word own (idios = related to oneself, one's own) indicating her submission is to her own husband, not to another.

Hupotasso has in view the maintenance of God’s willed order, not personal inferiority of women in any way. This word may denote either voluntary or forced behavior, but not any sense of inferiority.

Hupotasso was used as military term to describe soldiers submitting to their superior or slaves submitting to their masters. The word has primarily the idea of giving up one’s own right or will. It meant to arrange [as for example troop divisions] in a military fashion under the command of a leader. Submission then is not so much to a person per se as to the position of rank that is established to ensure order rather than chaos.  The buck private in the army may be a "better person" than the five-star general, but he is still a buck private. Slaves in the average Roman household in fact were "better people" in many ways when compared to their masters, yet they still had to be under authority to ensure order in the household. In non-military use hupotasso described "a voluntary attitude of giving in, cooperating, assuming responsibility, and carrying a burden". 

Hupotasso is not a spineless submission but, as one writer has eloquently described it, a "voluntary selflessness."

Constable paraphrasing material from the Family Life Conference writes that...

Submission involves at least four things. First, it begins with an attitude of entrusting oneself to God (see notes 1 Peter 2:23; 24; 25). The focus of our life must be on Jesus Christ. Second, submission requires respectful behavior (see notes 1 Peter 3:1; 3:2). Nagging is not respectful behavior. Third, submission involves the development of a godly character (see notes 1 Peter 3:3; 3:4; 3:5). Fourth, submission includes doing what is right (see note 1 Peter 3:6). It does not include violating other Scriptural principles. Submission is imperative for oneness in marriage. (Expository Notes)

Keep the historical context in mind reference to pagan husbands should be understood against the social background in which a wife was expected to accept the customs and religious rites of her husband.

Submission for Paul and Peter is a voluntary submission based on one’s own recognition of God’s order. It is the submission which is based on the death of pride on one hand and the desire to serve on the other. Ideally it is the submission not of fear but of perfect love. Christ Himself is the perfect example (see notes 1 Peter 2:21; 22; 23; 24; 25) of a servant Who submitted without reservation to His Father's perfect will (see notes Philippians 2:5; 2:6; 2:7;2:8). Thus there is nothing degrading about submitting to authority and accepting God’s ordained order that alone ensures the proper functioning of the marriage bond between a husband and wife.

 

1 Peter 3:6  just as Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling him lord, and you have become her children if you do what is right without * being frightened by any fear. (NASB: Lockman)

Greek: os Sarra hupekousen (3SAAI) to Abraam, kurion auton kalousa; (PAPFSN) es egenethete (2PAPI) tekna agathopoiousai (PAPFPN) kai me phoboumenai (PPPFPN) medemian ptoesin. 
Amplified: It was thus that Sarah obeyed Abraham [following his guidance and acknowledging his headship over her by] calling him lord (master, leader, authority). And you are now her true daughters if you do right and let nothing terrify you [not giving way to hysterical fears or letting anxieties unnerve you].
 (Amplified Bible - Lockman)
NLT: For instance, Sarah obeyed her husband, Abraham, when she called him her master. You are her daughters when you do what is right without fear of what your husbands might do. (
NLT - Tyndale House)
Phillips:  Sara, you will remember, obeyed Abraham and called him her lord. And you have become, as it were, her true descendants today as long as you too live good lives and do not give way to hysterical fears. (
Phillips: Touchstone)
Wuest:  as Sarah was in the habit of rendering obedience to Abraham, calling him lord, whose children [namely, Sarah’s] you become if the whole course of your life is in the doing of good, and you are not being caused to fear by even one particle of terror.  (
Erdmans
Young's Literal:  as Sarah was obedient to Abraham, calling him 'sir,' of whom ye did become daughters, doing good, and not fearing any terror.

THUS SARAH OBEYED ABRAHAM CALLING HIM LORD: os Sarra hupekousen (3SAAI) to Abraam kurion auton kalousa (PAPFSN):

Obeyed (5219) (hupakouo from hupó = under + akoúo = physical hearing and apprehension of something with the mind) (Click for study on related word hupakoe) means literally  to "hear under" and conveys the meaning of subordinating one’s self to the person or thing heard, hence to obey. The word means to hearken or to give respectful attention and so to obey. This word was used to describe one coming to the door upon hearing a knock, a good picture of obedience.

Wuest says that

Obeyed" is constative (of, relating to, or being a verbal form that expresses past completed action) aorist in Greek which speaks of an action going on over a long period of time, looking at it in one single panoramic view. The whole tenor of Sarah’s life was one of obedience to her husband.  (Wuest, K. S. Wuest's Word Studies from the Greek New Testament: Eerdmans or Logos)

Calling him lord - Obviously not in the sense that he was a "god" although unfortunately some husbands do place themselves in such an exalted position (at least in their own mind).

Lord (2962) (kurios from kúros = might, power in turn from kuróo = give authority, confirm) describes One who has absolute ownership and uncontrolled power. signifies sovereign power and authority.  In the NT, Jesus is referred to some ten times as Savior and some 700 times as Lord. When the two titles are mentioned together, Lord always precedes Savior. Is He your kurios? In classical Greek, kurios was used of gods and was found on inscriptions applied to different gods such as Hermes, Zeus, etc. Secular Greek also used kurios to describe the head of the family, the one who is "lord" of wife and children (although that does not give him the right to "lord" it over them!).

Kurios was used by Philippian jailer when he said to Paul and Silas after a great earthquake rocked the prison, opening the doors to their prison cell...

Sirs, (kurios) what must I do to be saved?” (Acts 16:30)

Jesus used kurios in teaching that

"No one can serve two masters; (kurios) for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will hold to one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon" (see note Matthew 6:24)

Kurios was used in secular Greek as a title of honor addressed by subordinates to their superiors, or as a courteous name in the case of persons closely related. In a petition to a high Roman authority we have, “I became very weak, my lord” and in another example “I entreat you, sir, to hasten to me.” Sarah used it as a wifely courtesy to her husband, as a recognition of her willing submission to Abraham's authority over her.

Moses records Sarah's reaction to the prophecy that she would bear a son...

And Sarah laughed to herself, saying, "After I have become old, shall I have pleasure, my lord  (kurios in the LXX referring in this context to her husband Abraham) being old also?" (Ge 18:12)

In a similar used of kurios Ruth addressed Boaz saying...

"I have found favor in your sight, my lord (kurios in the LXX), for you have comforted me and indeed have spoken kindly to your maidservant, though I am not like one of your maidservants." (see note Ruth 2:13)

AND YOU HAVE BECOME HER CHILDREN IF YOU (continually) DO WHAT IS RIGHT WITHOUT BEING FRIGHTENED BY ANY FEAR: es egenethete (2PAPI) tekna agathopoiousai (PAPFPN) kai me phoboumenai (PPPFPN) medemian ptoesin: (Ro 9:7-9; Gal 4:22-26) (14,15; Ge18:15; Is57:11; Da3:16-18; Mt26:69-75; Ac4:8-13,19)

Wuest translates it

whose children [namely, Sarah’s] you become if the whole course of your life is in the doing of good, and you are not being caused to fear by even one particle of terror.

The NLT is even more to the point:

You are her daughters when you do what is right without fear of what your husbands might do.

The Amplified Version adds that...

you are now her true daughters if you do right and let nothing terrify you [not giving way to hysterical fears or letting anxieties unnerve you].

The whole matter of subjection is illustrated by a reference to Sarah, who referred to Abraham as lord. Peter is saying that if Sarah ‘obeyed’ Abraham and called him Lord, the Christian wives in Asia should also treat their husbands with deference and respect. Christian women have become the offspring of Sarah, spiritually speaking, and continually do what is right without fear of what their husbands might do.

Lenski explains that...

Without being frightened by any fear” is not a condition for becoming a true daughter of Sarah in addition to doing what is right. It is rather the consequence of adopting the behavior that Peter advocated. If a Christian wife was suffering for her faith because of her conduct, she could gain great confidence by doing what Peter counseled and what Sarah practiced. She could understand that any suffering that came her way was not a result of her sinful behavior but in spite of her godly behavior (cf. 2:20; Pr  3:25). The sense is that these Christian women are to let nothing terrifying frighten them from their course. Pagan women may disdain and insult them because they have adopted a nobler wifehood, they yet remain unafraid. Pagan husbands may resent their Christianity; this, too, does not frighten them. (Lenski, Richard C. H. The Interpretation of the Epistles of St. Peter, St. John and St. Jude.  Augsburg Publishing House, 1961)

The daughters of Sarah are not to fear anything but displeasing God. They know that following Christ will mean suffering. But they believe God's promises...

But even if you should suffer for the sake of righteousness, you are blessed. AND DO NOT FEAR THEIR INTIMIDATION, AND DO NOT BE TROUBLED (see note 1 Peter 3:14)

Holy women who fix their hope in God take this promise of blessing through suffering, and they fight the tendency to fear by dwelling on the faithfulness of God.

"Sarah considered Him faithful Who had promised!" (see note Hebrews 11:11).

And then they do what Peter says in chapter 4

Therefore, let those also who suffer according to the will of God entrust their souls to a faithful Creator in doing what is right. (see note 1 Peter 4:19)

These women affirm the sovereign rule of God over their suffering and that they do not suffer apart from His will, ultimately resting their souls in the firm and omnipotent hands of their faithful Creator. They cast out fear and they hope in God. And so they prove themselves to

"not be sluggish, but imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises (as daughters of Sarah)  (see note Hebrews 6:12).

 

1 Peter 3:7  You husbands in the same way, live with your wives in an understanding way, as with someone weaker, since she is a woman; and show her honor as a fellow heir of the grace of life, so that your prayers will not be hindered. (NASB: Lockman)

Greek: Oi andres homoios sunoikountes (PAPMPN) kata gnosin, os asthenestero skeuei to gunaikeio aponemontes (PAPMPN) timen, os kai sugkleronomois charitos zoes, eis to me egkoptesthai (PPN) tav proseuchas humon
Amplified: In the same way you married men should live considerately with [your wives], with an intelligent recognition [of the marriage relation], honoring the woman as [physically] the weaker, but [realizing that you] are joint heirs of the grace (God’s unmerited favor) of life, in order that your prayers may not be hindered and cut off. [Otherwise you cannot pray effectively.]
 (Amplified Bible - Lockman)
NLT: In the same way, you husbands must give honor to your wives. Treat her with understanding as you live together. She may be weaker than you are, but she is your equal partner in God's gift of new life. If you don't treat her as you should, your