Exodus 17:8 Then Amalek came and fought against Israel at Rephidim. (NASB: Lockman)
Amplified: Then came Amalek [descendants of Esau] and fought with Israel at Rephidim. (Amplified Bible - Lockman)
NLT: While the people of Israel were still at Rephidim, the warriors of Amalek came to fight against them. (NLT - Tyndale House)
Young's Literal: And Amalek cometh, and fighteth with Israel in Rephidim,
Then - This is often used in the Bible as a "time sensitive" conjunction (see expressions of time) and marks a succession of time - thus the idea is "at that time" or "after that" or "next", thus it behooves the good inductive student to always stop and interrogate the text, asking for example "What time is it?", noting what is succeeding what. As you practice this "technique", you are developing a "questioning mindset" which (1) slows you down to savor the sweetness of the Word of God which is like honey, (2) allows you to actually meditate on the passage, the benefits of which are incalculable (Joshua 1:8-note, Ps 1:2-note, Ps 1:3-note). Note that immediately after a spiritual "high", God allowed the Amalekites to attack. Although this is not always the pattern, it is not uncommon to experience trials or afflictions after times of triumph. Therefore it behooves us to be alert to the fact that there are "Amalekites" lurking to steal our joy especially after we have experienced spiritual victory.
Nathan Stone reminds us that...
Only a few weeks had elapsed from the time the children of Israel left Marah, the place of bitter waters, till they reached Rephidim, the scene of Jehovah's revelation of Himself to them as Jehovah Nissi, Jehovah my banner. At Marah, we will recall, in healing the bitter waters of that place, He had revealed Himself as Jehovah Rapha (Jehovah Rophe), Jehovah Who heals, the One Who alone has the remedy for the sins of mankind, the balm for the sorrows and sufferings of His people; Who has sweetened the bitter waters of human misery and death through Christ, the Tree of life and the sweet and living waters. The children of Israel had gone from Marah to Elim, the place of refreshing and rest (Ex 15:27).
From there they journeyed to the wilderness of Sin (Ex 16) where they murmured against Moses because there was no food, and where they longed for the fleshpots of Egypt. There, Jehovah appeared in the cloud of glory and began to feed them with the wilderness manna.
Then they came to Rephidim where there was no water (Ex 17). At Marah the waters were bitter. Here there was no water at all. Hunger is difficult and discouraging enough to bear, but the sufferings and torments of thirst are unbearable. Their murmurings and threatenings against Moses were rather a tempting of Jehovah. They doubted God. Forgotten, the marvelous passage of the Red Sea and the drowning of Pharaoh and his hosts; forgotten, the miraculous healing of Marah's waters! Ignoring the coming down of the manna from heaven, they questioned God's goodness (see God's goodness) and even His presence. "Is the Lord among us, or not?" they said. And there from the rock in Horeb, that rock which Paul tells us was Christ (1 Cor. 10:4), Jehovah caused waters to spring forth to quench the multitude's thirst.
Then came the experience which occasioned Jehovah's revelation of Himself to His people as Jehovah Nissi. Israel discovered that perhaps there were worse enemies than even hunger and thirst. They now learned that their pathway was to be contested and barred by implacable human foes. (Stone, Nathan: Names of God. Moody. 1944)
Through the circumstances Israel had just experienced (Exodus 17:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) they had learned how God provided water (and food in Exodus 16:15 "What is it?" = "manna"-note). Israel's "learning" however was at best incomplete for they continued to grumble and quarrel with God even after clearly and indisputably seeing Jehovah's gracious hand of provision for their every essential need...but don't I likewise as a blood bought, heaven bound believer often manifest the same forgetful, ungrateful spirit (contrast the commands in 1Th 5:17-note,1Th 5:18-note)? And yet despite these great lessons from God, Israel had not yet experienced individual combat in warfare.
Two observations are worth commenting upon...
(1) Rephidim means rests (plural). One cannot take this too far but it does at least raise the thought that we are often most vulnerable when everything seems calm and restful. The point is that our enemy never sleeps and we too must remain ever vigilant and on guard...even when we "rest" (cp Mt 26:41, Mk 14:38)!
(2) The verb fought is translated in the Septuagint (Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament) with the verb polemeo meaning to make war or fight and is in the imperfect tense. You say "so what?" The point is that the imperfect tense conveys the picture of a repeated action, and thus one begins to understand that the Amalekites were attacking over and over again.
God Himself had fought for them when Pharaoh's army pursued them, backing them up against the Red Sea. At that "battle" they were instructed to
stand by and see the salvation of Jehovah which He will accomplish for you today...Jehovah will fight for you while you keep silent. (Ex 14:13, 14) (See notes on Israel's Deliverance and Egypt's defeat)
Although one must use considerable caution in interpreting Types (See related discussion - Typology ; see also Approach to Interpretation of God's Word for caveats) (cf Paul's use of tupos in 1Corinthians 10:6, 10:11) in the OT, there is a consensus among most conservative expositors that the Amalekites (Torrey's Topic - Amalekites) can be considered as representative of all evil forces opposed to God's people throughout all the ages.
And in the light of NT teaching, those enemies are most "conveniently" grouped into 3 categories:
1) The "FLESH" which is the "Sin principle" (see study of sarx as the evil disposition) that every human born has inherited (Ro 5:12-note) theologians call it "inherent sin") from Adam (every human born has inherited the deadly "Sin virus" from Adam and we pass on this "Sin virus" to all our offspring) which in turn produces in them the desire and propensity to commit personal sins. In other words, "Sin" (singular and in the original Greek in Romans usually modified with the definite article "the" = the Sin) is the power of sin to rule over man (Ro 6:1, 2, 3,-see notes Ro 6:1; 6:2; 6:3).
Personal "sins" (plural) are the outworking of the power of the Sin in thoughts, words and deeds = in other words, the personal sins that we each commit. For a believer, the Flesh or "Sin principle" has been rendered inoperative when we were crucified with Christ (Ro 6:6, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14-see notes Ro 6:6; 6:7;6:11;12; Gal 2:20- note) releasing us from slavery to the power that Sin as a principle or ruling force once had in our lives. The practical import of this truth is that believers have been delivered from the power of Sin (Ro 6:7, 11, 12, 13, 14 - see notes Ro 6:7; 11; 12; 13; 14 ) and now (under grace and control and empowerment of the Spirit) have the ability to say "No" to the "lusts (strong desires) of the flesh". And yet the Flesh remains in "latent" form in our physical or mortal bodies and is capable of rearing its ugly "Amalekite-like" head to wage war against us (Ro 6:12, 13, 8:13-see notes Ro 6:12; 13; 8:13).
Paul emphasizes this on going (albeit "momentary" for it will terminate eternally at our glorification - Hallelujah!) struggle in Galatians 5:17 (notes) teaching us that the
Flesh sets (present tense = continuously) its desire against the Spirit and the Spirit against the flesh, for these are (present tense = continuously) in opposition (literally lined up face to face against!) to one another (Why? What is the result?) so that you may not do the things that you please (or that you "continuously desire" = present tense). (Ga 5:17) (see notes)
Peter also reminds us that as
Aliens (parepidemois) and strangers" on earth we must continually "abstain (apechomaI [word study] - hold oneself away from ~ put some separation between) from fleshly lusts (word study), which (continually = present tense) wage war (see word study on strateuomai related to English "strategy" or "stratagem" = trick in war for deceiving and outwitting the enemy! - meditate on this verse now with these added insights) against the soul. (see notes 1 Peter 2:11)
One should be able to see the parallel between these NT truths and Ex 17:16 which teaches that "the LORD (Jehovah) will have war against Amalek from generation to generation." And beloved, if the Amalekites war against God, they will also continuously carry out war against His children who are in covenant with Him (Jn 1:12).
- John MacArthur's article Mortification of Sin
2) The WORLD represents sum total of the thoughts, ideas and actions that are opposed to God, which continually suppress His truth in unrighteousness and which influence and drive all men and women still "dead in their trespasses and sins" (Ep 2:1, 2-note, Ep 2:3 -note).
World (kosmos - word study ; aion - word study) in the context of spiritual warfare does not refer to the literal physical creation but to the world’s system of values and way of doing things -- these anti-god influences seek to coerce believers to conform to the world corrupt view (Ro 12:2-note). The unregenerate person (non-believer) is either consciously or unconsciously controlled by the values and attitudes of this anti-god world view and behaves accordingly - in rebellion to God. The leader of this world is Satan as John teaches in his first epistle writing that the "whole world lies in the power of the evil one."(1Jn 5:19). (See Piper's comment on "world")
3) The third "Amalekite" who continuously wages war against God and His children from generation to generation is
As believers it is vital to understand that we have been
delivered (rhuomai - word study = delivered) ...from the domain (exousia = right and might - word study) of darkness and transferred...to the kingdom of His beloved Son (Col 1:13 -note; cp parallel truth in Acts 26:18)
And so as we study this section of Exodus 17 that records Israel's literal warfare, let us keep in mind that
these things (1Co 10:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10) happened to them (Israel) as an example, (tupos) and they were written for our instruction (click discussion of verb form), upon whom the ends of the ages have come" (1Cor 10:6,11, cp 1Co 10:13-note)
Paul adds that if any one of us thinks he or she can stand in our own strength against the "Amalekites" then we need to
take heed (present imperative = command to continually beware) lest (we) fall. (1Cor 10:12)
Thus Israel had to learn in warfare that even though they were to personally "fight the good fight of faith" (1Ti 6:12), victory (cp parallel passages regarding Divine victory - 2Sa 23:10, 11, 12; 1Chr 11:14; Ps 44:2-note, Ps 144:10-note, Pr 21:31, Ps 20:7-note) is found only in trust and obedience to Jehovah, in context specifically designated as Jehovah Nissi, the LORD our Banner, their rallying point. This is the same lesson all believers must learn (and re-learn), lest we become overwhelmed and dismayed by the "Amalekites" who attack unfairly, unexpectedly and unremittingly! Also keep in mind that every "physical battle" is but a picture and manifestation of the underlying eternal spiritual struggle between good and evil. Israel's physical enemy in this battle was the Amalekites who were descendants of Esau's grandson, Amalek (Ge 36:12). They were nomads in the desert south of Canaan (1Sa 15:7; 27:8) who because they did not fear God (Dt 25:18, cp Ge 20:11, Ps 36:1-note; Ro 3:18-note) attacked God's people Israel. Their mode of attack was from the rear, assaulting the stragglers (Dt 25:17, 18, 19 Nu 24:20) who were "faint and weary" (ponder this point!).
I don't know what your experience is but when I am tired and weary that is often the very time that the "Amalekites" mount their "sniper" attacks. This is why Jesus warned His disciples, commanding them to
(present imperative = continuously) keep watching (click discussion of gregoreuo) and praying (present imperative = continuously) that you may not enter into temptation. The spirit is willing but the flesh is weak. (Mt 26:41).
In a similar way Peter also warned us to
"Be of sober spirit (aorist imperative = Do this now! It's urgent!), be on the alert (aorist imperative = Do this now! It's urgent!). Your adversary the devil, prowls about like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour. But resist (aorist imperative = Do this now! It's urgent!) him, firm in your faith, knowing that the same experiences of suffering are being accomplished by your brethren who are in the world. And after you have suffered for a little while, the God of all grace, who called you to His eternal glory in Christ, will Himself perfect, confirm, strengthen and establish you." (see notes 1Pe 5:8; 5:9; 10).
In Deut 25:17, 18, 19, just before the second generation of Israelites from Egypt entered the promised land, Moses reminded them that when the LORD gave them rest from their enemies, they were to completely blot out the memory of Amalek and that this is a command and not optional! In a similar vein, believers likewise cannot strike a truce with any of the "Amalekites", Satan, the world (Jas 4:4,1Jn 2:15, 16, 17) or our flesh (1Pe 2:11-note; Ga 5:16-note; Gal 5:17-note). When there is compromise with SIN ("Amalekites") by God's people, SIN begins its deadly, often insidious work (cp description of sin in He 3:13-note) to corrupt and ultimately to destroy (see relationship between sins and outcome of battles in Nu 14:42, 43, 44, 45, Jdg 6:1, 2, 3, 4-see notes). The Amalekites must always be utterly blotted out. We must not deal lightly with the presence of sins in our life (He 12:1, 2- see notes He12:1; 2).
Sadly many often quote 1Jn 1:9: "If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness:" as if it were a "spiritual band-aid" but then turn right around and immediately commit that sin again. We can be tempted to think that these personal sins are small (cf to the "little foxes" in Song 2:15 and see Our Daily Bread "Tiny Evils, Big Fall") and that they really do not impact our lives and that we have a "forgiveness credit card" that lets us commit sins with impunity and without consequences. But we forget that our sins grieve the heart (cf Ge 6:3, Ezek 6:9, Ep 4:30, Heb 3:17) of a thrice Holy God and they negate our spiritual victory and disturb our inner peace (see above - study Numbers 14 and Jdg 6 [see notes] for effect of sin on war with Amalekites). Our sins are like a silent but potentially deadly malignant tumor -- once the cancer gain a foothold, it begins to metastasize to other parts of the body and ultimately brings death to the body. The best cure for aggressive cancer is total obliteration of the cancer cells -- to "utterly blot them out".
And so we began to appreciate the severity and seriousness of God's command to Israel to
"blot out the memory of the Amalek from under heaven" in (Dt 25:19),
noting that in (Ex 17:14) it is God Who says
"I will utterly blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven."
These seemingly contradictory verses remind us that in spiritual warfare, we are responsible for our part of the "blotting out" process, but it is ultimately our Jehovah Nissi Who gives the victory. Paul echoes this mysterious interaction of man's responsibility and God's sovereignty in (Phil 2:12, 13-see notes Php 2:12; 13) exhorting us as believers to
work out (present imperative = command to continually work at this task... in reliance upon the Holy Spirit in us [see next portion of verse] and God's provision of amazing, life transforming grace) (our) salvation with fear and trembling, for it is God who is at work in (us), both to will and to work for His good pleasure." (Click for a schematic depiction of this important spiritual principle)
As Puritan John Owen wrote "Kill sin or it be killing you." (Owen's classic treatise Of the Mortification of Sin in Believers- The Necessity, Nature and Means of It is highly recommended -- it is a bit difficult to read through the old English but the reward is worth it!) And remember that God never calls us to do something He has not first equipped us to accomplish. Below are links to sermons by John Piper who "unpacks" a more modern approach regarding every believer's lifelong task to be "killing sin"...
- How to Kill Sin, Part 1
- How to Kill Sin, Part 2
- How to Kill Sin, Part 3
- (Click here for a list of additional John Piper's sermons on Sanctification and Growth in Christ-likeness)
The Old Sin Nature
Is a Unredeemable "Beast"
An illustration of the deadliness of sin comes from the tragic tale that began with a frantic 911 call from a woman who could only state that she needed help because she was being killed. When the police arrived, they found a bloody knife beside her lifeless body on the kitchen floor. Blood was spattered across the room, yet when the police examined the body, they found to their amazement not a single cut or puncture wound. The only evidence on her body was a large mark across her chest and neck. They then noticed a trail of blood leading into the next room. Following the blood they found a dying boa constrictor.
The woman had apparently raised the snake as a pet. On this particular day, the snake had apparently wrapped itself around the woman as she prepared food in the kitchen. For whatever reason, she had allowed the snake to entwine her body. Once the muscular snake began to constrict itself, the woman had apparently sensed the danger. In a panic, she had grabbed a knife and began to slash away. She managed to mortally wound the snake, but she was killed in the process.
This story is an incredible example of the power of Sin in our lives. We often take subtle compromises into our lives like an innocent pet. We think we can handle the snake without any real risk. Although we hear stories about the destruction of other people, we rationalize that they were simply weak. We can handle it! We think we know how far we can go. Thus we deal with sin flippantly and lightly. (from Hemphill, K: The Names of God) (cf the similar story of Tiny Evils, Big Fall)
Then Amalek came and fought against Israel at Rephidim
- Genesis 36:12,16; Numbers 24:20; Deuteronomy 25:17; 1Samuel 15:2; 30:1; Psalms 83:7
Amalek apparently means “dweller in a valley”. For more detail see the Dictionary Articles..
Moses records the first mention of Amalek (and it is assumed for purposes of the present discussion that this same Amalek is the father of the "Amalekites" although some dispute this interpretation)...
Timna was a concubine of Esau's son Eliphaz and she bore Amalek to Eliphaz. These are the sons of Esau's wife Adah. (Genesis 36:12)
Thus the Amalekites were direct descendants of Isaac. Yet they became the persistent and hereditary enemies of Israel (Jacob), a thorn in their flesh, and a constant menace to their spiritual and national life.
Balaam (see note) says that...
Amalek was the first of the nations, but his end shall be destruction. (Numbers 24:20)
As the first nation to attack the newly redeemed Israel (and thus typical of all who later hated God’s people), the Amalekites received the full impact of God’s curse upon
The Amalekites were a numerous and powerful people. It might have been expected that, as closely related to Israel as they were, they would have afforded help instead of opposition. Yet they opposed Israel in a most mean and cowardly way
Expositor's Bible adds this explanatory note...
"The Amalekites lived in the desert, south of Canaan around Kadesh (Genesis 14:7), otherwise known as the northern part of the Negev (Numbers 13:29, 14:25, 43). Amalek was the son of Eliphaz (Esau's eldest boy) by a concubine named Timna (Genesis 36:12) and became a "clan" or "chief" in the tribe of Esau (Genesis 36:15). Thus the Amalekites were distant cousins to the Israelites. There is every possibility that they had known about the promise of the land of Canaan that had been given to Esau's twin brother, Jacob; therefore, they should not have felt any threat to their interests in the Negev had this promise been remembered and taken seriously. After all, the promise was to be a means of blessing Amalek along with all the other nations (Genesis 12:3) if only they, like Abraham, would have believed. Instead they "came" (wayyabo') and attacked Israel at Rephidim--some distance south of the north-central district of the Sinai where they lived. Amalek's assault on Israel drew the anger of God on two counts: (1) they failed to recognize the hand and plan of God in Israel's life and destiny (even the farther-removed Canaanites of Jericho had been given plenty to think about when they heard about the Exodus-- Joshua 2:10); and (2) the first targets of their warfare were the sick, aged, and tired of Israel who lagged behind the line of march (Deut 25:17, 18, 19). Thus Amalek became the "first among the nations" (Numbers 24:20)--in this case, to attack Israel. They are placed in juxtaposition with another group of Gentiles in the next chapter (Jethro's Midianites) who believed in Israel's God. These two chapters illustrate two kingdoms and two responses to the grace of God from the Gentile world." (Gaebelein, F, Editor: Expositor's Bible Commentary OT 7 Volume Set: Books: Zondervan Publishing)
During the period of the judges, the Amalekites joined forces with the Ammonites and the Moabites to capture Jericho (Jdg 3:12,13-see notes ).
Later the Amalekites joined the Midianites and the people of the East in harassing the Israelites, and this evil coalition comprised a force
"in the valley as numerous as locusts". (Jdg 7:12-note)
Certainly too many Amalekites for Gideon’s army of 300 but not too many for Jehovah Who cannot lie and Who promised
And so Gideon and his band of 300 defeated the Amalekites in the Valley of Jezreel ("God sows" or "God scatters" - future site of the gathering of the armies of the world at Armageddon - Re 16:16-note) (Jdg 6:3-note, Jdg 6:33-note; Jdg 7:12-22-note), once again graphically illustrating the importance of man's responsibility and God's sovereignty (Click schematic) in achieving victory over the "Amalekites".
Despite the defeat, Amalek still had not faced the crushing judgment that the Lord had foretold to Moses (Ex 17:14, 15, 16). That task was assigned to Saul to utterly destroy the Amalekites...
Thus says Jehovah Sabaoth, LORD of hosts (of armies), 'I will punish Amalek for what he did to Israel, how he set himself against him on the way while he was coming up from Egypt. Now go and strike Amalek and utterly destroy all that he has, and do not spare him; but put to death both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey. (1Sa 15:2, 3).
Saul attacked and chased the enemy from the land, but he failed in his mission by sparing the Amalekite king Agag (note - see also discussion of one of Agag's apparent descendants below) and by holding on to some of the spoils of battle (1Sa 15:6, 7, 8, 9).
As a result of Saul's partial obedience which was in reality complete disobedience (in contrast to the unquestioning, complete obedience of Joshua in Exodus 17), Saul was told that the Lord would tear the kingdom from him and give it to "his neighbor who is better than you". (1Sa 15:10-33,28). Saul killed himself when he fell on his sword (1Sa 31:4) but in a bitter and ironic twist an Amalekite reported to David that he had killed Saul (2Sa 1:8,13). It appears that the Amalekite’s story is a fabrication for the first Samuel passage makes it clear that "Saul took his sword and fell on it". Perhaps the Amalekite sought recognition or reward from David by claiming to have slain Saul.
Later in Israel's history, the Amalekites who escaped from Saul (1Sa 15:7) were smitten by David...
And David slaughtered them from the twilight until the evening of the next day; and not a man of them escaped, except four hundred young men who rode on camels and fled. (1Sa 30:17)
The Amalekites who escaped from David were destroyed by the descendants of Simeon in the days of King Hezekiah (note - circa 715-686BC) when 500 men from the tribe of Simeon (note) defeated the Amalekites and dispossessed them from their land...
"they destroyed the remnant of the Amalekites who escaped, and have lived there to this day." (1Chr 4:43).
What are the potential consequences of failing to blot out the Amalekites?
One other possible consequence of Saul's failure to blot out the Amalekites occurred some 600 years later As an aside someone in describing the deceitful nature of sin has said that...
Sin will take you farther then you ever meant to stray
...will keep you longer than you ever thought you'd stay
...and will cost you more than you ever dreamed you have to pay!
In the book of Esther (written about 465BC, Saul having begun his reign about 1050BC over 500 years earlier) Haman is described as an offspring of an Agagite (Esther 3:1,10, 8:3,5, 9:24) (remember Saul originally spared Agag, king of the Amalekites) and many authorities feel that Haman therefore possibly represents a descendant of the Amalekites. He certainly manifested an "Amalekite-like" hatred for the Jews, conspiring to have them totally obliterated as a race (for proper context read the entire wonderful story of God's faithfulness to His covenant promises in the book of Esther). As you can read in Esther Haman's plot was foiled (ultimately by God) and he was hanged on the very gallows he sought to hang his arch rival, the Jew Mordecai. (Esther 9:25). Thus the Jews were preserved and the line of Messiah was kept intact.
In celebration of this victory over Haman, the Jews
called these days Purim (see note) after the name of Pur. ("pur" = lot [ note]; see Esther 3:7) And because of the instructions in this letter, both what they had seen in this regard and what had happened to them, the Jews established and made a custom for themselves, and for their descendants, and for all those who allied themselves with them, so that they should not fail to celebrate these two days according to their regulation, and according to their appointed time annually. So these days were to be remembered and celebrated throughout every generation, every family, every province, and every city; and these days of Purim were not to fail from among the Jews, or their memory fade from their descendants. (Esther 9:26, 27, 28).
Rabbinical commentators see this conflict with Haman and the Jews (cf the bitter rivalry of Esau and Jacob) as the historic struggle of the Jewish people with Gentile enemies whose unreasoning hatred persists for thousands of years. The Jews begin the celebration of Purim with a fast on the thirteenth day of the month (Esther 9:31), commemorating the date on which Haman’s evil decree was issued (Esther 3:12). The Jews attend the synagogue for the public reading of the Book of Esther. Whenever Haman is mentioned, the entire congregation cries out,
“May he be accursed!” or “May his name perish!” (sounds like "blotted out" doesn't it?)
Children bring a special Purim rattle called a “gregar” and use it to make noise every time they hear Haman’s name read. On the morning of the 14th day of the month, the Jews again go to the synagogue, where the Esther story is read again and the congregation engages in prayer. The story about Moses and the Amalekites (Exodus 17:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16) is also read. Then the celebrants go home to a festive holiday meal with gifts and special foods, and the celebrating continues on the next day. They also send gifts and food to the poor and needy so that everybody can rejoice together. The name Purim (see note) is the plural of the Babylonian word pur which means lot, thus the festival's name originates from Haman’s casting of lots to determine the day when the Jews would be destroyed (Esther 3:7). Note the emphasis among modern day Jews on teaching the children the meaning of Purim so that the message of the feast would not be lost in future generations.
As Warren Wiersbe notes:
It’s sad when a nation (or a church) forgets its heroes and the providential events that have kept it alive. How easy it is for a new generation to come along and take for granted the blessings that previous generations struggled and sacrificed to attain! The Jews didn’t make that mistake but established the Feast of Purim (see note) to remind their children year after year that God had saved Israel from destruction. There’s nothing wrong with meaningful tradition. The church is always one generation short of extinction; and if we don’t pass on to our children and grandchildren what God has done for us and our fathers, the church will die of apathy and ignorance. “Come, you children, listen to me; I will teach you the fear of Jehovah” (Ps 34:11-note - Ed note: Have you ever prayed "Lord, teach me the fear of Jehovah? Consider making this a prayer as you ponder the spiritual fruit that such a prayer will surely yield considering God's promise in 1Jn 5:15,16 - Pr 1:7, 9:10, Job 28:28, Eccl 12:13, 14, Ps 111:10-note; Ps 25:14-note, etc). It’s when tradition gradually becomes traditionalism that we get into trouble. Theologian Jaroslav Pelikan said, “Tradition is the living faith of the dead; traditionalism is the dead faith of the living. (from his commentary long and take for granted the blessings that previous generations struggled and sacrificed to attain! The Jews didn’t make that mistake but established the Feast of Purim to remind their children year after year that God had saved Israel from destruction (Be committed. An Old Testament Study. Ruth and Esther. Wheaton, Ill.: Victor Books)
Note this principle is commanded by God Himself in (Ex 17:14). Pastor Ray Stedman has some thought provoking comments on Queen Esther and Haman in a sermon entitled The Price of Survival (Click here for his very instructive, nine part sermon series on Esther).
Exodus 17:9 So Moses said to Joshua, "Choose men for us, and go out, fight against Amalek. Tomorrow I will station myself on the top of the hill with the staff of God in my hand." (NASB: Lockman)
Amplified: And Moses said to Joshua, Choose us out men and go out, fight with Amalek. Tomorrow I will stand on the top of the hill with the rod of God in my hand. (Amplified Bible - Lockman)
NLT: Moses commanded Joshua, "Call the Israelites to arms, and fight the army of Amalek. Tomorrow, I will stand at the top of the hill with the staff of God in my hand." (NLT - Tyndale House)
Young's Literal: and Moses saith unto Joshua, 'Choose for us men, and go out, fight with Amalek: to-morrow I am standing on the top of the hill, and the rod of God in my hand.'
CHOOSE MEN FOR US AND GO OUT, FIGHT AGAINST AMALEK:
- Numbers 31:3,4
Choose is a command to take a keen look and make a careful, well-thought out choice. Why would such discernment be necessary? At this stage, Israel could hardly be described as a seasoned fighting force. It is interesting to note that the Septuagint (LXX) adds the adjective dunatos (1415) (mighty, powerful, strong, possessing inherent ability to perform some task, able to bear calamities and trials with fortitude and patience) as a qualification for the men Joshua is to choose..."choose mighty men for us".
Joshua's assignment was to muster a task force and this was part of Joshua's being groomed for military leadership in Israel. This implies that to be a leader one must have the ability to discern those qualities in others that will be of value in completing the task at hand (in this case war).
What principle do we see in this request? Moses is "mentoring" Joshua, preparing him to take over as leader of Israel. A mentor is a "trusted counselor or guide" who comes alongside not to control, but to advise and to serve as a source of wisdom and counsel gently guiding you through the obstacles so that you can live successfully. The Church today needs to return to the practice of mentoring or perhaps more Biblically to discipling. Paul was a the spiritual father to such young men as Timothy and Titus, both of whom he referred to as "sons" (1Ti 1:2,18; 2Ti 2:1-note; Titus 1:4-note). And this vital function is not just for men. Writing to Titus Paul instructed him that...
Older women likewise are to be reverent in their behavior, not malicious gossips, nor enslaved to much wine, teaching what is good, that they may encourage the young women to love their husbands, to love their children, to be sensible, pure, workers at home, kind, being subject to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be dishonored. (See notes Titus 2:3; 2:4; 2:5)
Dear reader, if you a mature believer, perhaps you need to find someone to disciple Or if you are a new Christian, you would be well advised to seek out the companionship of a believer who demonstrates by the fruit in his life that he has a dynamic relationship with Christ. This has always been God's pattern for Spiritual Leadership 101. What a dynamic body the Church of Jesus Christ would be if all the "Moses" sought out the "Joshuas" to mentor and disciple. In short, every Christian should either be mentored or be a mentor (disciple maker). How are you doing?
Back again to Exodus 17 we find that Moses faced with a mortal enemy, responded quickly, giving commands and instructions to his trusted servant Joshua.
When we are confronted by sudden, unexpected attack from our mortal enemies, the world, the flesh and the devil, do we respond by quickly seeking our "Joshua", our Jesus?
Through trials and tests Israel had experienced in the first 3 months in the desert (Ex 15:22, 23, 24, 25 26, 27, 16:1-36, 17:1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, etc), the people were learning how God was their Provider of the necessities for life, but now Israel had to learn through the testing of war that the battle was the LORD's and that He alone could defeat Israel's enemies. Their part was to trust and obey, for there is no other way to be "happy" in Jesus but to "Trust and Obey".
JOSHUA means "Jehovah is salvation" or "Jehovah is Help" and the Septuagint translates the Hebrew with the Greek word "Iesous" the NT word for "Jesus". Joshua was from the tribe of Ephraim. Ex 17:9 marks the first mention of Joshua in Scripture. He would have been about 45 years of age and had served as Moses’ aide-de-camp (Ex 24:13, 33:11; 32:17; Josh 1:1). To be most accurate, it should be noted that at this time Joshua's name was still Hoshea, (variously defined as "to give deliverance or help" or as "salvation") which later was changed to Joshua at Kadesh (Kadesh-Barnea) just before the 12 spies were sent on a reconnaissance mission into the promised land of Canaan ("Moses called Hoshea the son of Nun, Joshua" in Nu 13:16). We know that Joshua was a man of faith, for he and Caleb were the only two of the twelve spies who brought back an encouraging report of the promised land they were sent to spy out.
This field training against the Amalekites was undoubtedly preparation for Joshua as he led the Israelites against the pagan enemies in Canaan. Even as God had trained Moses for his work, He was now training Joshua to succeed him.
What is God training you for right now?
Do the trials seem to never end, to be without an obvious purpose?
Could it be that God is training you in and through the trial? (cf Jas 1:2-4,12) God does not waste the obstacles in our lives but desires that we might see them as opportunities to grow in grace and the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
Therefore, my beloved brethren, be (present imperative = command to make this our lifestyle attitude to be) steadfast, immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, knowing that your toil is not in vain in the Lord. (1Co 15:58)
Go out...fight - Both of these Hebrew verbs are in the imperative indicating that they are not suggestions but commands.
Given Amalek's lineage from Esau, in a sense this battle was a renewal of the age old rivalry between Jacob and Esau (Ge 25:27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 3, 34,Ge 27:41).
Joshua was called to fight in the valley and Moses would be on the hill. Notice that this unusual strategy met with no grumbling or disputing from Joshua (See discussion of doing all things without grumbling in Php 2:14 [see note]).
Would I have been so trusting and so obedient, especially given the unorthodox nature of the "strategy"?
In these seemingly small details we begin to learn much about the heart of this one name Joshua, who is living up to his great name which means "Jehovah is salvation".
- Numbers 31:3,4; The staff - Ex 4:2,20)
Joshua in the valley and Moses on the hill - Once again we see the principle that weaves throughout testaments, both old and new, the principle that...
Divine sovereignty and human responsibility are inextricably, mysteriously linked in carrying out the will of God.
The staff of God (click to study other references to Moses' staff) (See Spurgeon's sermon Exodus 7:12 The Power of Aaron's Rod) represents the second time this phrase is used (Ex 4:20) and the last mention of the ROD/STAFF in Exodus (cf Nu 20:8, 9). The staff was not a "magic wand" but was clearly a symbol or sign of the presence of God's power over evil, over nature, and over every circumstance however seemingly hopeless.
Most (but not all) commentators have said that Moses on the hill was a picture of intercession, which certainly could have been the case but if one restricts themselves to "Sola Scriptura", the text does not definitely specify that Moses was interceding. Nevertheless, in view of his past experiences of crying out to God in times of crisis (cf Ex 8:12, 17:4, 32:11, 12, 13,30, Nu 11:2, 12:3, 14:13,17, 21:7, Dt 9:26), it would seem quite unlikely that he was on the hilltop simply observing the battle and not interceding. Someone has well said that it takes intercession on the mountain as well as intervention in the valley for God’s people to win the victory.
The army of the Lord is most often victorious
when it marches forward "on its knees".
The Christian missionary martyr Jim Elliot added...
"That saint who advance on his knees never retreats".
In summary, Israel had stood still and watched God defeat Pharaoh's forces, representing the most powerful army in the world, but in this battle Israel was called upon to enter the battle themselves and trust Jehovah for the victory (cf 1Jn 5:4, 5).
John MacArthur comments:
It (the rod) became, therefore, the symbol of God’s personal and powerful involvement, with Moses’ outstretched arms perhaps signifying an appeal to God. The ebb and flow of battle in correlation with Moses’ uplifted or drooping arms imparted more than psychological encouragement as the soldiers looked up to their leader on the hilltop, and more than Moses’ interceding for them. It demonstrated and acknowledged their having to depend upon God for victory in battle and not upon their own strength and zeal. It also confirmed the position of Moses both in relation to God and the nation’s well-being and safety. They had angrily chided him for their problems, but God confirmed his appointment as leader.
Moses by raising the staff in his hand was clearly showing that he looked for victory to God alone and that he did not trust in his (or Joshua and his soldiers) “arm of flesh.” Through Moses' rod, the "staff of God", Jehovah showed Himself to be Israel's strength and sufficiency before the evil Pharaoh and at the Red Sea (with the enemy in "hot pursuit" and by all visible evidence, no way of escape for Israel) and now Elohim again worked to show His power and the absolute necessity of total dependence on Him. Because of his obedience and dependence upon Elohim, Joshua prevailed and in so doing he learned valuable truth about God and about the requirements for he who will be a
vessel for honor, sanctified, useful to the Master, prepared for every good work. (See note 2Ti 2:21)
If we like Joshua will maintain a teachable, obedient, dependent spirit in our battles with the "Amalekites", we too will learn much about the ways of God and about ourselves.
Ken Hemphill comments on the "staff of God":
It was not simply Moses' dramatic and visible posture on the hilltop that inspired confidence in his troops; it was THE ROD OF GOD HELD ALOFT THAT BROUGHT THEM VICTORY. Though the rod was likely nothing more than a SHEPHERD'S STAFF, God had used it as an object lesson to show Moses His power to accomplish His work. Back in Exodus 4, when God called Moses to lead Israel out of captivity, and Moses objected that no one would believe him or listen to what he had to say, God asked what he had in his hand. It was his shepherd's staff. God then instructed him to throw the staff on the ground, whereupon it became a serpent. The Lord then instructed Moses to take the serpent by the tall and once he did, it again became a staff. This staff was to be used as a sign that the God of Israel had appeared to Moses (Ex 4:5).When Moses obeyed God and departed for Egypt, he took the staff of God with him (Ex 4:20). From this point forward, this simple staff became the rod of God, which Moses used to effect various plagues in Egypt and the striking of the rock that provided water for the thirsting Israelites in the wilderness (Ex 17:5, 6). It is this same rod that is now called "THE LORD IS MY BANNER." This visible symbol was intended to illustrate graphically to all of Israel's warriors that the VICTORY OVER AMALEK BELONGED TO GOD. Israel could do nothing in themselves to defeat the Amalekites, but UNDER THE BANNER OF THE LORD, VICTORY WAS ASSURED. (from Hemphill, K: The Names of God)
Exodus 17:10 And Joshua did as Moses told him, and fought against Amalek; and Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the hill. (NASB: Lockman)
Amplified: So Joshua did as Moses said and fought with Amalek; and Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the hilltop. (Amplified Bible - Lockman)
NLT: So Joshua did what Moses had commanded. He led his men out to fight the army of Amalek. Meanwhile Moses, Aaron, and Hur went to the top of a nearby hill. (NLT - Tyndale House)
Young's Literal: And Joshua doth as Moses hath said to him, to fight with Amalek, and Moses, Aaron, and Hur, have gone up to the top of the height
AND JOSHUA DID AS MOSES TOLD HIM:
- Joshua 11:15; Matthew 28:20; John 2:5; 15:14
Don't go by this phrase too quickly. Meditate on the cross references (Joshua 1:7, 8, 11:12, 15) and ponder the significance of what Moses is recording about Joshua's character.
Obedience is the "secret" for success and blessing in the spiritual life and in (spiritual) warfare. Are you being defeated by your "spiritual enemies" (whether the world, the flesh ~ indwelling SIN NATURE inherited from Adam or the devil)?
If so, then consider praying the prayer of David, the man after God's own heart (Ps 139:23, 24, Ps 51:10, 11, 12).
Revival and renewal begins with reflection and repentance.
The writer of Hebrews warns us of the passing pleasures (Heb 11:24, 25) and subtle deceit of our indwelling SIN nature (He 3:12, 13-see notes He 3:12, 13, cf Song 2:15) so let us be quick to repent and seek the times of refreshing (Acts 3:19-20) and be diligent to enter His rest (He 4:11, 12, 13-see notes He 4:11; 12; 13).
Victory for the Christian today is not found in individual ingenuity but an INDIVIDUAL, our "obedient Joshua" (our Jesus, compare He 5:8; 5:9-see notes, 1John 5:4, 5) and our victory in Christ is contingent upon walking in the light (1Jn 1:6, 7, 8 cf Col 1:12,13-note, 2Cor 7:1-note, 1Jn 2:28, 3:2, 3, 2Pe 3:11-note, 2Pe 3:14-note), being surrendered to the Commander-in-chief's will (Ro 12:1-note, Ro 12:2-note, cf 1Cor 6:19, 20, Lu 22:42, John 4:34, 5:30).
AND FOUGHT AGAINST AMALEK:
To be sure "the battle is the LORD's" (1Sa 17:47, 14:6, 2Chr 20:15, 16, 17, Ps 46:11, Zec 4:6, Pr 21:31 Ro 8:31-note, Ro 8:37-note) but as has been mentioned several times in these notes saints are responsible to "fight the good fight of faith" (1Ti 6:12). (See discussion of "Good Soldier" 2Ti 2:3, 4-notes)
The armies of Israel would fight with normal combat techniques, but the victory was assured because of God’s power on His people’s behalf. Therefore in the final analysis "victory belongs to the LORD." (Pr 21:31).
Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the hill (Ex 17:12; 24:14)
Esau was a picture of the flesh. As Israel could not overcome Amalek by their own efforts, neither can you nor I overcome the flesh by our own efforts. The flesh wars against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh. Paul explains it in Gal 5:17,
For the flesh sets its desire against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; for these are in opposition to one another, so that you may not do the things that you please (see notes)
This is the picture we have in the wilderness as Israel and Amalek war against each other." (McGee, J V: Thru the Bible Commentary: Thomas Nelson)
Exodus 17:11 So it came about when Moses held his hand up, that Israel prevailed, and when he let his hand down, Amalek prevailed. (NASB: Lockman)
Amplified: When Moses held up his hand, Israel prevailed; and when he lowered his hand, Amalek prevailed. (Amplified Bible - Lockman)
NLT: As long as Moses held up the staff with his hands, the Israelites had the advantage. But whenever he lowered his hands, the Amalekites gained the upper hand. (NLT - Tyndale House)
Young's Literal: and it hath come to pass, when Moses lifteth up his hand, that Israel hath been mighty, and when he letteth his hands rest, that Amalek hath been mighty.
SO IT CAME ABOUT WHEN MOSES HELD HIS HAND UP THAT ISRAEL PREVAILED:
- Ps 56:9; Luke 18:1; 1Timothy 2:8; James 5:16
In Exodus so far the rod of God is the token of the power of God. When Moses used it, God demonstrated His power. To use the rod of God was to say that God did it. To fight without the rod was to face defeat. Using the rod of God was a way of submitting to and depending on the power of God in all areas of life. Israel’s strength lay only in a continuous appeal to (and dependence on) the Lord’s power as they fought. Moses upheld hands represent a symbol of appeal to God for help and enablement.
The Net Bible Notes explains that...
This short passage (Exodus 17:8-16) gives the first account of Israel’s holy wars. The war effort and Moses’ holding up his hands go side by side until the victory is won and commemorated. Many have used this as an example of intercessory prayer—but the passage makes no such mention. In Exodus so far the rod of God is the token of the power of God; when Moses used it, God demonstrated his power. To use the rod of God was to say that God did it; to fight without the rod was to face defeat. Using the rod of God was a way of submitting to and depending on the power of God in all areas of life. The first part of the story reports the attack and the preparation for the battle (Ex 17:8, 9). The second part describes the battle and its outcome (Ex 17:10, 11, 12, 13). The final section is the preservation of this event in the memory of Israel (Ex 17:14, 15, 16). (See Net Bible Notes)
Nathan Stone explains that...
It was the rod of God's mighty hand and outstretched arm, the rod of the Elohim. How significant is this use of the name denoting His creative glory, might, and sovereignty, the general name of God, the name especially used in relationship to the nations (represented here by Amalek) as distinguished from Jehovah in relationship especially to Israel! Then it is the Elohim here, with the definite article, the only Elohim, denoting that whether Amalek acknowledged it or not, He was God. It is this rod, as the banner of God, which brought the victory.
AND WHEN HE LET HIS HAND DOWN AMALEK PREVAILED:
Commentaries, both ancient and modern (eg, see Henry Law's comments - Prevailing Intercession), almost unanimously consider this act of Moses as indicative of prayer (although to reiterate it is not specifically stated and so we must be Bereans). In any event, these changes in Moses' posture express an attitude of dependence upon God that determined the outcome of the battle and served to demonstrate the reality of this dependence to all of Israel's warriors. God had provided manna from heaven and water from the rock; now He provides deliverance from enemies.
Nathan Stone asks...
What was the meaning then of Amalek's success when it was lowered and Israel's success when it was raised? It was to sharply emphasize and deeply impress upon Israel's warring soldiers and her watching, anxious host that upon God alone depended and to Him belonged the victory; that under His raised banner victory was always assured. No matter what the odds, then, for in Moses' own words five should chase a hundred and a hundred should chase ten thousand (Lv 26:8). That rod was the symbol and pledge of His presence and power and working.
Alfred Edersheim comments that...
This holding up of Moses’ hands has been generally regarded as symbolical of prayer. But if that were all, it would be difficult to understand why it was absolutely needful to success that his hands should be always upheld, so that when they drooped, merely from bodily weariness, Amalek should have immediately prevailed. Moreover, it leaves unexplained the holding up of the rod towards heaven. In view of this difficulty it has been suggested by a recent commentator, that the object of holding up the hands was not prayer, but the uplifting of the God-given, wonder-working rod, as the banner of God, to which, while it waved above them, and only so long, Israel owed their victory. With this agrees the name of the memorial-altar, which Moses reared to perpetuate the event—Jehovah-nissi, “the Lord my banner.” But neither does this explanation quite meet the statements of Scripture. Rather would we combine both the views mentioned. The rod which Moses held up was the banner of God—the symbol and the pledge of His presence and working; and he held it up, not over Israel, nor yet over their enemies, but towards heaven in prayer, to bring down that promised help in their actual contest. And so it ever is: Amalek opposes the advance of Israel; Israel must fight, but the victory is God’s; Israel holds the rod of almighty power in the hand of faith; but that rod must ever be uplifted toward heaven in present application for the blessing secured by covenant-promise.
Exodus 17:12 But Moses' hands were heavy. Then they took a stone and put it under him, and he sat on it; and Aaron and Hur supported his hands, one on one side and one on the other. Thus his hands were steady until the sun set. (NASB: Lockman)
Amplified: But Moses’ hands were heavy and grew weary. So [the other men] took a stone and put it under him and he sat on it. Then Aaron and Hur held up his hands, one on one side and one on the other side; so his hands were steady until the going down of the sun. (Amplified Bible - Lockman)
NLT: Moses' arms finally became too tired to hold up the staff any longer. So Aaron and Hur found a stone for him to sit on. Then they stood on each side, holding up his hands until sunset. (NLT - Tyndale House)
Young's Literal: And the hands of Moses are heavy, and they take a stone, and set it under him, and he sitteth on it: and Aaron and Hur have taken hold on his hands, on this side one, and on that one, and his hands are stedfast till the going in of the sun;
AND AARON AND HUR SUPPORTED (literally "grasped securely") HIS HANDS, ONE ON ONE SIDE AND ONE ON THE OTHER
- Ps 35:3, Isa 35:3 2Co 1:11 Php 1:19 1Th 5:25 Heb 12:12 Pr 27:17 Eccl 4:9, 10, 11, 12, Ro 15:30, 31, 32
God’s leaders have always depended on others to support them in their work. Today the church is a living dynamic body (Ep 1:22, 23, 4:4, 4:12 -notes Ep 1:22; 23; 4:4; 12; Col 1:24-note) (not a dead static building, an organism not an organization) and IF the "Aaron's" and the "Hur's" in the body are poor stewards (see note 1 Peter 4:10) and fail to utilize their spiritual gifts (1Co 12:4,7,11,18, Ro 12:3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8f-note), both the "common good" (1Cor 12:7) of the body of Christ and the "glory of God" (1Pe 4:10, 11-notes) will be adversely affected (and this may account for why the "Amalekites [have] prevailed" in so many churches).
Hur is mentioned for the first time and is mentioned again with Aaron in Exodus 24:14, where Moses placed both of them in charge of the camp while he and Joshua went up into the mountain of God.
If you are a leader or potential leader (and the truth is that we all are "leaders" to someone in our life) these truths in Exodus teach us that God's leaders depend on others to support them in their work. Moses like Paul centuries later (see Ro 16 and comments on all those who "helped hold up" Paul's hands in ministry) recognized that he could not carry out his ministry alone. Leaders are made more effective by those who help them.
In Proverbs 27:17 Solomon reminds us that as...
Iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another.
In Ecclesiastes 4:9–12 Solomon declares that...
Two are better than one because they have a good return for their labor. For if either of them falls, the one will lift up his companion. But woe to the one who falls when there is not another to lift him up. Furthermore, if two lie down together they keep warm, but how can one be warm alone? And if one can overpower him who is alone, two can resist him. A cord of three strands is not quickly torn apart.
The great apostle Paul never ministered alone. He shared his first leadership opportunity in the church at Antioch with four other men, and throughout the following years of his missionary travels, he always had companions. The only time we find him alone in Acts is for a brief period in Athens (Acts 17- notes).
Kroll writes that...
Few things of importance come easy. Noah Webster worked 36 years on his dictionary, while Gibbon labored 26 years on his Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. When Milton was writing Paradise Lost, he rose at 4:00 every morning to begin work. Plato wrote the first sentence of the Republic nine times before it was acceptable to him.
In the midst of challenging circumstances, it's wonderful to have friends who will come along and give their help. Moses experienced such a blessing. The conflict with the Amalekites was a key battle. If the Israelites were defeated at such an early stage on their journey, they likely would become so discouraged that they would turn around and go back to Egypt. Victory was essential, but it wouldn't come easy. The Israelites were winning only when Moses held up his hands in prayer. After hours in this position, however, his arms began to tire and defeat seemed a real possibility. That was when Aaron and Hur stepped in. With a little help from his friends, Moses was able to keep his hands held up until the enemy was thoroughly defeated. (Ref)
THUS HIS HANDS WERE STEADY UNTIL THE SUN SET:
This is first use of steady in Bible, which is interesting because not infrequently the first use of a word in Scripture lays the groundwork for subsequent uses.
Steady is the Hebrew word 'emuwnah which is used 48x in NASB
Exod. 17:12; Deut. 32:4; 1 Sam. 26:23; 2 Ki. 12:15; 22:7; 1 Chr. 9:22, 26, 31; 2 Chr. 19:9; 31:12, 15, 18; 34:12; Ps. 33:4; 36:5; 37:3; 40:10; 88:11; 89:1f, 5, 8, 24, 33, 49; 92:2; 96:13; 98:3; 100:5; 119:30, 75, 86, 90, 138; 143:1; Prov. 12:17, 22; 28:20; Isa. 11:5; 25:1; 33:6; 59:4; Jer. 5:1, 3; 7:28; 9:3; Lam. 3:23; Hos. 2:20; Hab. 2:4
Emuwnah is most often translated "faithfulness" as for example in the description of God our Rock in (Deut 32:4). So here in the description of Moses' "steady hands" and his "steady supporters" we have a great word picture of faithfulness -- that which is firm, steady, reliable, dependable.
The Net Bible comments that...
There may be a double entendre here; on the one hand it simply says that his hands were stayed so that Israel might win, but on the other hand it is portraying Moses as steady, firm, reliable, faithful. The point is that whatever God commissioned as the means of the agency of power--- to Moses a rod, to the Christians the Spirit --- the people of God had to know that the victory came from God alone
The faith and perseverance of this tired but true triad represent a clear illustration of the truth stated in (He 6:11, 12-notes) by which the saints of all ages are to lay hold of God's promises and ultimately His victory over "the Amalekites". Joshua learned this lesson and at the command of Jehovah performed almost an identical role for his army taking Ai as Moses had done for Joshua (Joshua 8:18)
"Then Jehovah said to Joshua, “Stretch out the javelin that is in your hand toward Ai, for I will give it into your hand.” So Joshua stretched out (same Hebrew verb used repeatedly of Moses' outstretched staff in Exodus) the javelin that was in his hand toward the city....26 For Joshua did not withdraw his hand with which he stretched out the javelin UNTIL he had utterly destroyed all the inhabitants of Ai." (Joshua 8:18, 26)
So as long as Joshua's javelin was stretched out Israel was victorious, eventually blotting out Ai. Let us learn the basic spiritual warfare principle that Joshua had learned so well -- that is, that strength and success in battle against God's foes lay not in the "arm of flesh" (2 Chr 32:8) but in a constant and complete dependence upon Jehovah’s power.
Expositor's Bible Commentary notes that the staff raised in Moses' hand...
was not merely for psychological effect to inspire the troops every time they glanced up the hill (S.R. Hirsch, The Pentateuch: Exodus 2d ed. [Gateshead, Eng.: Judaica, 1973], 2:233). Nor does the text specifically claim that Moses prayed while his hands were raised (the more traditional explanation). Rather, Moses' outstretched arms primarily symbolized his appeal to God. He had commanded Moses on previous occasions, "Stretch out your hand" ( neteh 'eth -yadeka ) with the staff (Ex 9:22, 23; Ex 10:12, 13; Ex 14:16). Yet in Ex 10:21, 22 only the hand was stretched out. This staff was no magic wand. Like all OT institutions, the external and visible symbol meant nothing unless (1) it was divinely appointed and (2) the obedient use of the external form was accompanied by the internal and invisible motions of the heart and spirit of a man. Thus the prophetic-symbolic action of the constantly upraised hands did signal the fervent prayers of the heart of Moses as he witnessed the battle. As Bush ( Exodus 2:22) aptly remarks, "The whole narrative ... conclusively shows that God designed to teach Israel that the hand of Moses, with whom [Israel] had just been chiding, contributed more to their safety than their own hands; his rod more than their weapons." Finally the lengthy battle came to an end, with Joshua as victor." (Gaebelein, F, Editor: Expositor's Bible Commentary OT 7 Volume Set: Books: Zondervan Publishing)
It is also interesting that even as Moses built an altar after the victory, Joshua likewise built an altar (Josh 8:30) and
wrote there on the stones a copy of the law of Moses, which he had written, in the presence of the sons of Israel (Josh 8:34).
C H Spurgeon (who like most commentators associates the uplifted hands with prayer) offers the following devotional thoughts on this passage...
Exodus 17:12 Spurgeon - Morning and Evening- “And his hands were steady until the going down of the sun.” — Exodus 17:12
So mighty was the prayer of Moses, that all depended upon it. The petitions of Moses discomfited the enemy more than the fighting of Joshua. Yet both were needed. No, in the soul’s conflict, force and fervour, decision and devotion, valour and vehemence, must join their forces, and all will be well. You must wrestle with your sin, but the major part of the wrestling must be done alone in private with God. Prayer, like Moses’, holds up the token of the covenant before the Lord. The rod was the emblem of God’s working with Moses, the symbol of God’s government in Israel. Learn, O pleading saint, to hold up the promise and the oath of God before him. The Lord cannot deny his own declarations. Hold up the rod of promise, and have what you will.
Moses grew weary, and then his friends assisted him. When at any time your prayer flags, let faith support one hand, and let holy hope uplift the other, and prayer seating itself upon the stone of Israel, the rock of our salvation, will persevere and prevail. Beware of faintness in devotion; if Moses felt it, who can escape? It is far easier to fight with sin in public, than to pray against it in private. It is remarked that Joshua never grew weary in the fighting, but Moses did grow weary in the praying; the more spiritual an exercise, the more difficult it is for flesh and blood to maintain it. Let us cry, then, for special strength, and may the Spirit of God, who helpeth our infirmities, as he allowed help to Moses, enable us like him to continue with our hands steady “until the going down of the sun;” till the evening of life is over; till we shall come to the rising of a better sun in the land where prayer is swallowed up in praise.
Exodus 17 records a most interesting experience in the life of Moses. As long as his hands, grasping the rod of God, were up-held, Joshua and the Israelites prevailed against the Amalekites. As the battle progressed, however, Moses' hands became so heavy that he could no longer retain his posture. Aaron and Hur then held his hands up for him, and victory was achieved.
Even as Moses needed the assistance of Aaron and Hur, so today those called to spiritual leadership need the undergirding of the people to whom they minister. I am thinking especially of pastors. I don't know of another work so demanding, discouraging, and fraught with potential pitfalls. These men need our support and encouragement. By the way, how long has it been since you took your pastor's hand and verbally expressed your gratitude for his ministry? A word properly timed will be, in effect, "holding up his hands," and will help to assure spiritual victory in your church.
A terrible fire was raging, and many attempts were being made to save a child who stood at a top window frantically waving and calling for help. One man, braver than the rest, put forth a last bold endeavor to rescue the boy. Sensing the almost impossible odds, and fearing he might fail, someone in the crowd cried, "Cheer him, cheer him!" The people caught the words and shouted loudly. Inspired and encouraged by their support, the man doubled his efforts and rescued the child from the flames.
Do you know any Christian worker who is similarly trying by all means in his power to snatch "brands from the burning," and to save immortal souls? Cheer him, and then see how your kind sympathy helps him to work on with fresh courage and renewed energy.
Why not make this "appreciation week" for your pastor? Encourage him, "cheer him"! (Our Daily Bread, Copyright RBC Ministries, Grand Rapids, MI. Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved)
O "hold up the hands" of the worker for Christ,
Encourage his soul by your prayer;
A handclasp, a smile, or a word of good cheer,
Will help him life's burdens to bear. — G. W.
Wouldn't it be fine if all those who point a critical finger would hold out a helping hand instead?
In 1989, paraplegic Mark Wellman climbed the sheer granite face of Yosemite's El Capitan. On the last day of his climb, The Fresno Bee ran a picture of Wellman being carried triumphantly on the shoulders of climbing companion Mike Corbett. The caption read, "Paraplegic and partner prove no wall is too high to climb." What the story did not say is that in helping Wellman scale El Capitan once, Corbett had to make that difficult, demanding ascent three times!
Today's Bible reading focuses on Moses, whose upheld hands brought God's help in a crucial battle. But don't forget Aaron and Hur. They had to climb the same mountain themselves, and their support of Moses' arms took time, strength, and commitment on their part. The principle is this: People who serve the Lord "behind the scenes" often pay a higher price than those who are in the center of public attention. —D. C. Egner (Our Daily Bread, Copyright RBC Ministries, Grand Rapids, MI. Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved)
We need each other if we are to do what God wants us to do.
Exodus 17:13 So Joshua overwhelmed Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword. (NASB: Lockman)
Amplified: And Joshua mowed down and disabled Amalek and his people with the sword. (Amplified Bible - Lockman)
NLT: As a result, Joshua and his troops were able to crush the army of Amalek. (NLT - Tyndale House)
Young's Literal: and Joshua weakeneth Amalek and his people by the mouth of the sword.
SO JOSHUA OVERWHELMED (Mowed down (RSV) disabled, weakened, prostrated, Septuagint = "put to flight, routed") AMALEK AND HIS PEOPLE WITH THE EDGE OF THE SWORD:
- Joshua 10:28,32,37,42; 11:12
The verb "overwhelmed" is used elsewhere to describe how man dies and is powerless (Job 14:10; Isa 14:12).
Did you notice the phrase...
So Joshua overwhelmed...
It is not stated that he gained the victory because of his striving, ingenuity or courage (all of which doubtless were present). Joshua gained the victory because Jehovah-nissi granted him the victory and this is a truth we must all continually remember (Pr 21:31, Ps 37:39). Even though we are beneficiaries of victories over the "Amalekites" (flesh, the world and the devil) and even often are credited with those victories, the victory ultimately belongs to the Lord...we would not have "overwhelmed" them unless the Lord had been on our side.
Paul expresses a similar thought in these verses:
Not that we are adequate in ourselves to consider anything as coming from ourselves, but our adequacy is from God (2Cor 3:5)
The Jewish NT paraphrases (Romans 8:37) as
"No, in all these things we are superconquerors, through the one who has loved us."
Vine's says literally this phrase in (Romans 8:37) is "we are hyper-conquerors," i.e., we are pre-eminently victorious" IN and THROUGH CHRIST.
Francis Schaeffer echoes this truth noting that...
"God was teaching these people a serious lesson in their first warfare, and no one was to learn it better than Joshua the general. In the midst of battle, is one to fight? Yes. To be a good general? Yes. But when everything is done, the power is to be understood as God’s, not man’s." And all God's people said "Amen!"
Another aspect of God's training of Joshua was was that he was able to serve under Moses and observe that humble man's commitment to Jehovah and Jehovah's unwavering commitment to Moses. God reaffirmed this same unwavering commitment to Joshua some 40 years later telling him that:
"No man will be able to stand before you all the days of your life. Just as I have been with Moses, I will be with you; I will not fail you or forsake you. " (Joshua 1:5).
Each of us needs a relationship with a "Moses" (or a "Paul") who can serve as our model. We each need to see in others both faithfulness to God and God's faithfulness to them. Who is your Moses or Paul beloved?
Future leaders need to learn how to wait on (trust) the Lord (Isa 40:31-note). Often their followers don’t always see as far as they see or have the faith that they have. The vision of future victory is what motivates a true leader (cf Heb 11:1, 2-note, Heb 11:8, 9, 10-note, Heb 11:13, 14, 15, 16-note) but, as we saw in Exodus 16, Israel, too often was looking back to the appeal of the world and not forward toward the promises of God.
An interesting observation is that the first victory by Israel in battle was over the Amalekites but their first defeat in battle was also at the hands of the Amalekites (Nu 14:39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45). For insight into how to gain the victory over "the Amalekites" in our life you might want to do a simple inductive Bible study comparing these two accounts. Why was their overwhelming victory in one setting and utter defeat in another setting against the same enemy? Dear saint, may the Spirit of God open the eyes of your heart, so that you may know what is the hope of His calling, what are the riches of the glory of His inheritance in the saints, and what is the surpassing greatness of His power toward us who believe.
Exodus 17:14 Then the LORD said to Moses, "Write this in a book as a memorial, and recite it to Joshua, that I will utterly blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven." (NASB: Lockman)
Amplified: And the Lord said to Moses, Write this for a memorial in the book and rehearse it in the ears of Joshua, that I will utterly blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under the heavens. (Amplified Bible - Lockman)
NLT: Then the LORD instructed Moses, "Write this down as a permanent record, and announce it to Joshua: I will blot out every trace of Amalek from under heaven." (NLT - Tyndale House)
Young's Literal: And Jehovah saith unto Moses, 'Write this, a memorial in a Book, and set it in the ears of Joshua, that I do utterly wipe away the remembrance of Amalek from under the heavens;'
THEN THE LORD SAID TO MOSES WRITE THIS IN A BOOK AS A MEMORIAL (reminder)
- 1Sa 12:24, Ex 12:14; 13:9; 34:27; Deuteronomy 31:9; Joshua 4:7; Job 19:23; Haggai 2:2,3
This is the first reference to writing an official record in a scroll or book. This particular "entry" was to be especially for the purpose of remembering the victory in the very first battle in which they nationally engaged (cf the memorial in Ex 12:14
Now this day [LORD's Passover] will be a memorial to you, and you shall celebrate it as a feast to the LORD; throughout your generations you are to celebrate it as a permanent ordinance.
The truth that God alone grants victory over one's enemies was as important for Israel to know as the fact that God alone was to be their source of food or water in the desert. And so too the church corporate and individual believers need to recall these foundational truths to mind.
If you are like me you are prone to forget things, including the good things that God has done for you. Oh, how quickly I forget an answer to prayer, a divine deliverance, or even divine discipline. Abraham Lincoln observed about his own generation
We have been the recipients of the choicest bounties of heaven. We have grown in numbers, wealth, and power, as no other nation has ever grown. But we have forgotten God. We have forgotten the gracious hand which preserved us in peace and which multiplied, and enriched, and strengthened us.
What was God's antidote for forgetfulness? He instructed Moses to write a memorial describing what had taken place in the battle against the Amalekites. This memorial was to be read to Joshua, the future leader of Israel, so he would be sure to remember as well. Moses did write it down in The Book and thus God's victory over the Amalekites became a source of encouragement for Christians throughout the millennia. Dearly beloved, are you keeping a written account of the good things God has done for you? Perhaps you need to begin a spiritual diary. Perhaps you might place some memorial in your yard, such as a tree which would be a constant reminder to you and your children. You might place a rock in your back yard and write the date of the event on it. Here's the point -- our memory's are short, but God's goodness is everlasting and we need to do something to aid our remembrance of God's blessings. Then next time you feel downcast or discouraged, or you even wonder whether the Almighty God really cares for you personally, look at the tree you planted, the rock you placed or the journal you wrote in and refresh your memory. As someone has well said the weakest ink is stronger than the greatest memory!
The battle against the Amalekites was not won by Israel's cunning or might but by the Lord's strength. The written word was to be a continual reminder of this fact even as the Bible today is to be to us a "memorial" of God's strength, sufficiency and ultimate triumph over all evil (be it flesh, world or devil). How important therefore to saturate our minds with the truth about Jehovah Nissi.
Do you write down "memorials" commemorating those things God has done in your life so that in years to come you might look back and be reminded of His faithfulness?
AND RECITE IT TO JOSHUA
- cf the famous verse in Joshua 1:7, 8
Literally in Hebrew "recite" means "to put in the ear". The KJV is translates it as to "rehearse it in the ears of Joshua". Young's Literal is the most literal translating it "set it in the ears of Joshua".
The defeat of the Amalekites was something God wanted Joshua to remember. Why? John Calvin reflects on the value of memorials explaining...
"lest he should faint under the many difficulties which awaited him. For nothing could better support him with invincible firmness than the recollection of this history, from whence he might be assured that the people would ever be victorious under the auspices of God." And the same holds true in your life, child of the Living God.
As Moses’ “assistant” for many years (Joshua 24:13), Joshua stayed with his master and served him faithfully. God’s pattern for leadership is summarized in (Mt 25:21 His master said to him, 'Well done, good and faithful slave; you were faithful with a few things, I will put you in charge of many things, enter into the joy of your master.'"), and that pattern remains the same -- when we prove ourselves faithful as servants over a few things, then God can make us "rulers" over many things. Joshua was able to give orders because he had learned how to take orders. Have you?
THAT I WILL UTTERLY BLOT OUT THE MEMORY OF AMALEK FROM UNDER HEAVEN
- Numbers 24:20; Deut 25:17, 18, 19; 1Sa 15:2,3,7,8,18; 27:8,9; 30:1,17; 2Sa 1:1,8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16; 8:12; 1Chr 4:43; Ezra 9:14
- Memory - Job 18:17; Ps 9:6; Proverbs 10:7
God in a somber "I Will" declaration predicts Amalek's final, complete and utter demise.
Amalek, a descendant of Esau, as discussed above is a picture of the flesh, the evil, corrupt, Adamic nature of man interminably bent on rebellion against God and His people. As Israel could not overcome Amalek by their own efforts, neither can you nor I overcome the flesh by our own efforts in this battle which is from "generation to generation" (1Pe 2:11-note; Gal 5:17-note).
The very strong and graphic Hebrew word "utterly blot out" (machah) (4229) is used 35 times in the NASB, the first time in Genesis 6:7 in God's famous decree upon the sinful world...
"Jehovah said, "I will blot out man whom I have created from the face of the land."
There are 2 other uses of "machah" in Exodus, where we find Moses speaking after Israel has sinned against God by forming an idolatrous golden calf...
"But now, if Thou wilt, forgive their sin and if not, please blot me out from Thy book which Thou hast written!" and Jehovah said to Moses, "Whoever has sinned against Me, I will blot him out of My book." (Ex 32:32-33 )
Referring again to the Amalekites God instructs His people...
"you shall blot out (machah) the memory of Amalek from under heaven; you must not forget". (Dt 25:19)
David uses "machah" twice in one of his most famous Psalms in which he appeals to God...
And finally to help you get a sense for the meaning of this strong Hebrew verb machah, observe three picturesque uses in one verse in which God is prophesying certain judgment upon faithless Jerusalem...
And I will stretch over Jerusalem the line of Samaria and the plummet of the house of Ahab, and I will wipe Jerusalem as one wipes a dish, wiping it and turning it upside down. (2Ki 21:13)
Note that the Septuagint (LXX) translates machah with the Greek verb exaleipho (1813) (derived from ek =out + aleipho = wipe) which literally means to wash or wipe out completely. The picture is to cause something to cease by obliterating all evidence.
As you have observed the uses of machah, you now have a good sense for what God will do to Amalek and what He commands Israel to do to them in (Deut 25:19). As mentioned earlier, again we see God's sovereignty over Amalek juxtaposed with man's responsibility to blot out Amalek.
Now apply this truth to the Amalekites in your life. In this life we will never be able to completely wipe out "the world, the flesh or the devil" but we are called to continually "fight the good fight of faith" (1Ti 1:18,6:18,2Ti 4:7-note) knowing that in eternity future God will completely blot out all of the "Amalekites" forever. Hallelujah!
Exodus 17:15 And Moses: built an altar, and named it The LORD is My Banner (NASB: Lockman)
Amplified: And Moses built an altar and called the name of it, The Lord is my Banner; (Amplified Bible - Lockman)
NLT: Moses built an altar there and called it "The LORD Is My Banner." (NLT - Tyndale House)
Young's Literal: and Moses buildeth an altar, and calleth its name Jehovah-Nissi,
AND MOSES BUILT AN ALTAR:
- cf Noah, Abram, Isaac in Ge 8:20; 12:7; 26:25; 33:20; 35:1
Compare similar action by Jacob building an altar and naming it El-Elohe-Israel (Ge 33:20), the mighty God of Israel.
Built an altar - This phrase occurs 12 times in the ESV - Gen. 8:20; 12:8; 13:18; 26:25; 35:7; Ex 17:15; 24:4; 32:5; Jos. 8:30; Jdg 6:24; 1Sam. 14:35; 1Ki. 18:32
The altar became an anthropomorphism (an interpretation of what is not human or personal in terms of human or personal characteristics) for God. Note that when Israel murmured and failed God, the name commemorated the incident or the outcome of their failure (Ex 17:7 [Ex 17:1-7]). When they were blessed with success, the naming praised God.
As Sammy Tippit an evangelist from San Antonio, Texas writes
Our banner must not be our ministries, our denominations, our programs or our methods. Our banner must be Jehovah - Nissi. Moses built an altar and called it Jehovah - Nissi. Perhaps you need to build an altar in your heart and call it Jehovah - Nissi. Allow Him to be your rallying point. He alone gives victory. If you find yourself discouraged in the midst of spiritual battles, then you will always be able to return to that altar and find the source of victory." (If you would like to catalyze the reigniting of the "fire" on the altar of your heart.
Calvin echoes this thought that Moses gave God the glory (not himself, not Joshua, not Israel's valiant warriors), so that Israel who might have been
"inflated by their good success, should not boast of their own strength, but glory only in God."
AND NAMED IT THE LORD IS MY BANNER (ensign, standard, flag) (Jehovah Nissi) (cp Isaiah 11:10,12 where signal = banner = Messiah):
This is the only use of this specific name Jehovah Nissi in Scripture.
Banner (see references) is used 21 times in the OT - Exod. 17:15; Nu 21:8, 9; 26:10; Ps. 60:4; Isa. 5:26; 11:10, 12; 13:2; 18:3; 30:17; 31:9; 33:23; 49:22; 62:10; Jer. 4:6, 21; 50:2; 51:12, 27; Ezek. 27:7
Note also that Moses names the altar rather than God (cf Ge 22:14 where Abraham names Mt Moriah "Jehovah Jireh"). The idea expressed seems to be that Jehovah Himself is the rallying point for His people. We have our victory not through our own efforts but through Christ alone (Jn 16:33; 1Jn 2:13, 14; 5:4, 5). When the Israelites fought the Amalekites at Rephidim, Moses held up his hand, thus becoming a living banner symbolizing God’s presence to help His people win the victory. The Hebrew word translated “banner” is related to the word translated “standard” in (Nu 21:8, 9) and is used for the “pole” on which the bronze serpent was placed, this banner providing a picture of Jesus lifted up on the Cross to heal from the "bite of the serpent" (Jn 3:14,15) having being made sin for us (2Cor 5:21). Tragically what was meant to be a symbol to point to the God Who alone heals in the Messiah's fully satisfactory (propitiatory) death on Calvary, soon became an idolatrous image that the people ironically named Nehushtan ("a mere piece of brass" or a "worthless piece of bronze") even sinking to such a level of depravity as to offer incense to the "worthless piece of brass"! This pagan practice of idolatrous "standard" worship lasted for 760 years until Hezekiah broke into pieces by Hezekiah:
"He removed the high places and broke down the sacred pillars and cut down the Asherah. He also broke in pieces the bronze serpent that Moses had made, for until those days the sons of Israel burned incense to it; and it was called Nehushtan." (2Kings 18:4)
Since the word “banner” today suggests cloth, the connection with the Hebrew understanding may be missed. For example, in ancient times, a spear could serve as a standard in battle, with or without bits of cloth tied to it. Later, a staff might have a device on it to mark the rallying point for troops. In the ancient world, these were sometimes images or signs of the gods.
Moses’ staff is the ensign to which Joshua’s army could look and that symbolized God’s saving power. Moses declares that God Himself is the Standard, the Ensign of His people.
The Septuagint (LXX) has an interesting Greek phrase kurios mou kataphuge to translate the name Jehovah nissi. This Greek phrase is literally the Lord my Refuge (my safe retreat, my sure refuge). This same Greek word, kataphuge, (which is not found in NT) is used 19 times in the Septuagint translation of the OT and most of these uses refer to God Himself. And so we see kataphuge used to translate the following descriptions of God (these are from the NASB)...
- fortress (Ps 18:2, Ps 31:3, Ps 71:3, Ps 91:2, Ps 144:2)
- hiding place (Ps 32:7)
- refuge (2 Sam 22:3, Ps 46:1, Ps 59:16, Jer 16:19)
- stronghold (Ps 9:9)
- dwelling place (Ps 90:1)
Here is a devotional note on Jehovah Nissi from God is Enough
Nothing is more abundantly proved in the Bible than that the Lord will fight for us if we will let Him. All He asks of us is to be still and let Him fight for us. This is the only sort of spiritual conflict that is ever successful. But we are very slow to learn this. When temptations come, instead of handing the battle over to the Lord we summon all our forces to fight them ourselves. We believe, perhaps, that the Lord is somewhere near, and if the worst comes to worst, He will step in to help us. But for the most part we feel that we ourselves and we only must do all the fighting. Our method of fighting consists generally in a series of repentings, resolutions and promises, weary struggles for victory, and then failing again—over and over. Each time we tell ourselves that now at last we will have the victory, and each time we fail even worse than before. This may go on for weeks, months, or even years, and no real or permanent deliverance ever comes. God has told us to cease from our own efforts and hand our battles over to Him.
In Israel's first battle with the Amalekites war was waged as instructed by Moses (Joshua on ground/Moses on hill) and God granted victory. In Israel's second recorded battle the enemy was again the Amalekites but this time their efforts brought a disastrous defeat. What was the difference? As alluded to in the devotional when we attempt the battle in our own strength as Israel did the passage below we too will be defeated.
In Numbers 14, we read that in an expression of their unbelief, Israel refused to go into the promised land. Then we read of their response upon hearing God's decree ('Surely you shall not come into the land in which I swore to settle you, except Caleb [see description of his character Nu 14:24] the son of Jephunneh and Joshua the son of Nun" Numbers 14:30):
In the morning, however, they rose up early and went up to the ridge of the hill country, saying, "Here we are; we have indeed sinned, but we will go up to the place which the LORD has promised." But Moses said, "Why then are you transgressing the commandment of the LORD, when it will not succeed? "Do not go up, lest you be struck down before your enemies, for the LORD is not among you. "For the Amalekites and the Canaanites will be there in front of you, and you will fall by the sword, inasmuch as you have turned back from following the LORD. And the LORD will not be with you." But they went up heedlessly to the ridge of the hill country; neither the ark of the covenant of the LORD nor Moses left the camp. Then the Amalekites and the Canaanites who lived in that hill country came down, and struck them and beat them down as far as Hormah. (Numbers 14:40-45)
The Theological Wordbook of the OT adds the following note on the meaning of the 20 OT uses of the Hebrew word for "BANNER" = "NES" ("nicci") (signal pole, standard, ensign, banner, sign, sail, warning):
"In the OT, nēs generally means a rallying point or standard which drew people together for some common action or for the communication of important information. This usually happened on a. high or conspicuous place within the camp or community. There, a signal pole, sometimes with an ensign attached, could be raised as a point of focus or object of hope....People would rally together around a nēs for various purposes, one of the most important being the gathering of troops for war. The prophetic materials particularly emphasize this use of the standard. Isa 5:26 pictures God raising a standard among the nations, signaling Assyrian warriors for muster against sinful Israel. The trumpet was often used as a war alarm to summon soldiers around the nēs." (Harris, R. L., Harris, R. L., Archer, G. L., & Waltke, B. K. Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament Moody Press)
Set up a standard on the earth, blow the trumpet among the nations for war against her (Jer 51:27; see also Jer 4:21; Isa 18:3).
The standard was usually raised on a mountain or other high place (Isa 13:2; 18:3; 30:17). There, public proclamations could be made (Jer 50:2). Soldiers deserting the standard in panic (Isa 31:9) signaled defeat. When a standard was raised toward a city, it was a sign for its residents to “flee for safety” before the attack (cf. Jer 4:6)....The word nēs is also used in the prophets in connection with the return to Zion.
An ensign is to be raised over the nations (Isa 62:10) and they will bring the sons and daughters of Zion back to her (Isa 49:22). It is not surprising that Isaiah, the Christological prophet par excellence, personifies nēs. He says “in that day the root of Jesse shall stand as an ensign to the peoples; him shall the nations seek” (Isa 11:10; cf. 11:12). So Israel’s Messianic king will be lifted up (cf. Jn 3:14; Phil 2:9) that all men might rally around him.
Illustration - Queen Elizabeth II of England has three royal residences (Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle and the Palace of Holyrood) plus two private homes. This could be confusing for those who want to find her except for one important fact: the queen's banner always flies over whichever residence she is currently occupying. If her banner of blue and gold is on the flagpole, the queen is sure to be present. In the same way Moses built an altar and named it Jehovah Nissi so that all would know that the King was in residence. Perhaps you are going through difficult circumstances. Or perhaps you have just come out of a time of trial. Regardless of the circumstances, we need to ask ourselves whether we are "flying the banner" of the LORD so that others know the King is present. Moses built a memorial to remind everyone that God was in residence with His people Israel and that He had not abandoned in the midst of the attacks of the Amalekites. Generation after generation could look up and see this altar, Jehovah Nissi, and recall that even as the Lord was present with Israel in the battle against the Amalekites, He was still present in their midst. In the same way, believers today should raise the Lord's banner, no matter how difficult their circumstances, knowing that He is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow and He will not abandon His presence in their midst, even though circumstances might suggest otherwise. Paul testified to this truth writing to Timothy explaining that...
At my first defense no one supported me, but all deserted me; may it not be counted against them. But the Lord stood with me, and strengthened me, in order that through me the proclamation might be fully accomplished, and that all the Gentiles might hear; and I was delivered out of the lion's mouth. (See notes 2 Ti 4:16; 17)
Is your testimony like that of Moses and Paul? Is it obvious to others that Jesus is in residence in your life? Make sure that His flag, colored with faith, hope and love, flies high over the castle of your life. It's a privilege to fly that banner but it is a shame not to. If the King is in residence, be sure to fly His flag.
The Pentateuch employs nēs four times. When the Amalekites were defeated (Ex 17:15), Moses built an altar to commemorate the victory. Realizing that the Lord was the Banner around which Israel had rallied, he called the altar “Jehovah nissi” (the lord is my banner). Later on in the wilderness, Moses lifted up among the people a bronze serpent set upon a pole (nēs) (Num 21:8–9). This rallying point of healing and life became a fitting object-lesson of something greater to come (cf. Jn 3:14;15). nēs is also employed in Numbers in the sense of “sign” or “warning” (Nu 26:10)."
Amplified: And he said, Because [theirs] is a hand against the throne of the Lord, the Lord will have war with Amalek from generation to generation. (Amplified Bible - Lockman)
NLT: He said, "They have dared to raise their fist against the Lord's throne, so now the LORD will be at war with Amalek generation after generation. (NLT - Tyndale House)
Young's Literal: and saith, 'Because a hand is on the throne of Jah, war is to Jehovah with Amalek from generation -- generation.'
The difficulty of the Hebrew text permits an alternative translation:
“a hand is upon/toward/against the throne/banner of Yahweh,”
This gives the sense of supplication, or of taking an oath.
Contextually, the significance is clear, whatever the translation adopted: The ongoing problem with Amalek was not merely one nation hostile toward another, it was a war between God and Amalek, and thus between God's people and Amalek. The Lord here declares perpetual war against Amalek and the Book of Esther (see above) relates the last recorded battle in that war (see also 1Sa 15:32; 30:1–10; 1Chr 4:43). It is interesting that "Israel My Glory" (published by the Friends of Israel Ministry) lists this altercation with the Amalekites as the one of the first examples of "anti-Semitism" in Scripture.
Francis Schaeffer has this interesting insight on the fact that it was Jehovah Who would have war against Amalek explaining that this...
"indicates that the Amalekites understood something of the fact that they were fighting not only against the Israelites, but also against the God who stood behind the Israelites. One can question how much knowledge they had, but their actions remind me of 20th-century men who understand that what they are really fighting against is at least the concept of the Judeo-Christian religion and the culture which was based upon it."
In summary, as alluded to several times in this study of Jehovah Nissi, the phrase "war against Amalek from generation to generation" is a picture of the ongoing warfare every redeemed sinner experiences with his or her "Amalekite", especially the flesh nature, part of the process referred to as sanctification. (Click for an explanation of the relationship between salvation, sanctification and glorification)
Paul alludes to this struggle explaining that
"the flesh (like an Amalekite continually) sets its desire against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh for these are (continually) in opposition to one another, so that you may not do the things that you please." (see note Galatians 5:17 )
Peter exhorts us to prepare for a lifelong war writing...
"Beloved, I urge you as aliens and strangers (adopt the mindset of an alien) to (continually) abstain from fleshly lusts, which (continually) wage war (Greek word here gives us our English "strategize" -- does this give you a picture of the assaults waged by your indwelling sin nature?) against the soul." (see note 1 Peter 2:11)
BE KILLING SIN
IT BE KILLING YOU
The great Puritan theologian John Owen covered the topic of our life long war against sin in his treatise "Of the Mortification of Sin in Believers" writing that
Mortification abates [sin’s] force, but doth not change its nature. Grace changeth the nature of man, but nothing can change the nature of sin….Destroyed it may be, it shall be, but cured it cannot be….If it be not overcome and destroyed, it will overcome and destroy the soul. And herein lies no small part of its power….It is never quiet, [whether it is] conquering [or] conquered. Do you mortify; do you make it your daily work? be always at it whilst you live; cease not a day from this work; be killing sin or it will be killing you." (Of the Mortification of Sin in Believers- The Necessity, Nature and Means of It)
Every honest Christian will testify that becoming a believer does not erase the tendency to sin and that there is a constant need to "blot out the Amalekites". The new (and old) believer still derives pleasure from sin (Heb 11:25-note). We all continue to struggle with sinful desires. Those evil predispositions and habits are so deeply ingrained in the flesh nature that we continue spiritual warfare against them even into old age! Only glorification sets us totally, gloriously free from the presence and pleasure of sin! But in the meantime, all genuine believers are capable of temporarily (but not habitually) falling into appalling, shameful sins. The truth is, we each commit sins daily. Our thoughts are not what they ought to be. Our time is often wasted on frivolous and worldly pursuits as the Amalekites maraud our poorly protected "stragglers in the rear". And our hearts may even grow cold to the things of God.
Why does all this happen if sin’s dominion is broken?
We do not have time or space to deal with this critical topic in this discussion of Jehovah-nissi, but for those who have the time we would refer you to the more extensive treatment of this critical subject in a multipart paper entitled, “The Actual Practice of Mortification by Greg Herrick based on the original work (which is somewhat more difficult to read because of the archaic English) by John Owens, "Of the Mortification of Sin in Believers" (aka "blotting out the Amalekites")
See Exposition on Spiritual Warfare
- Ephesians 6:10
- Ephesians 6:11
- Ephesians 6:12
- Ephesians 6:13
- Ephesians 6:14
- Ephesians 6:15
- Ephesians 6:16
- Ephesians 6:17
- Ephesians 6:18
THE METAPHOR OF THE CHRISTIAN SOLDIER
- Soldier Illustrations
- Exposition of 2 Timothy 2:3-4
- Three Kinds of Soldiers - Ten Principles of Warfare
- Roman Soldier by Edward Gibbon (Decline & Fall of Roman Empire)
- The Roman Soldier - Description from Jewish Historian Josephus
- A Few Soldier Stories and Sermons
- The Chief Design of My Life: Mortification and Universal Holiness
- When the "Want To" and the "Ought To" Don't Match
- Hope-Giving Promises for Triumph over Sin
- A Passion for Purity Vs Passive Prayers
- How to Kill Sin, Part 1
- How to Kill Sin, Part 2
- How to Kill Sin, Part 3
- How Dead People do Battle with Sin
- The War Within: Flesh Vs. Spirit
- Why and How We Walk According to the Spirit
- How the Spirit Does What the Law Could Not Do