FOR THE
OVERSEER MUST BE ABOVE REPROACH AS GOD'S STEWARD: dei (3SPAI) gar ton episkopon
anegkleton einai (PAN) os theou oikonomon:
(Titus 1:5; Php 1:1; 3:1; 3:2;
3:3; 3:4; 3:5; 3:6; 3:7; 3:8; 3:9; 3:10; 3:11; 3:12; 3:13) (Mt 24:45; Lk
12:42; 1Co 4:1,2; 1Pe 4:10)
for it is a necessity in the nature of the case that the overseer be
such that no charge can be brought against him as God’s superintendent
(Wuest)
it behoveth the overseer to be blameless (Young's Literal)
must be free from all charge against him (Darby)
An elder has the job of taking care of God's work. So he must not be
guilty of doing wrong. (ICB)
To exercise spiritual oversight a man must be of unimpeachable virtue,
for he is God's agent in the affairs of his household (Phillips)
For since a church leader is in charge of God’s work, he should be
without fault (TEV)
The following traits are an easily applied practical list to guide
selection of elders/overseers beginning with a list of "negatives" then
moving on to a list of "positives".
Overseer (1985)
(episkopos
[word study] from epi = upon + skopos
= distant mark or goal looked at & related word sképtomai
= to look about = source of English "scope") is literally one who
watches upon or over others.
Greeks used episkopos to
describe their pagan gods supposedly watching over worshipers and over
nations. In
Athens epískopoi (plural) were magistrates sent to
outlying cities to organize and govern them.
Episkopos
was used to describe an overseer in any capacity, with examples in
ancient writings describing the official in charge of the repairing of a
temple or an officer in an army. Paul had warned the Ephesian elders to
"be on guard for yourselves and for all the flock, among which the
Holy Spirit has made you overseers (episkopos),
to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood."
(Acts 20:28).
Paul's addressed the Philippian epistle
"to all the saints in Christ
Jesus who are in Philippi, including the overseers (episkopos)
and deacons" (Php 1:1-note).
As alluded to earlier Paul equates elders with overseers writing to
Timothy to note that
an overseer then must be above reproach (1Ti 3:2).
The last NT use of episkopos describes Jesus as
the Shepherd and Guardian (episkopos)
of your souls. (1Pe 2:25-note)
Although the word
"overseer" is not used in the following verse, the writer of Hebrews
aptly characterizes the critical role of leaders as those who "keep
watch over your souls" and that they "will give an account (as all
stewards must likewise do to their Master)." (see Hebrews 13:17-note)
The secular and Biblical
uses of episkopos both emphasize the idea of men charged with exercising watchful care
over others. In the NT the overseer watches over the spiritual life of
the "sheep" in his flock.
"Elder" (presbuteros)
implies the maturity and dignity of the man, while "overseer" (episkopos)
indicates his work as the "overseer" of God's flock. Someone
has summarized elder and overseer with the statement that
elder is the title, oversight is the function.
Must
be (1163)
(dei
from deo = to bind or tie objects together, put in
prison and also root of
doulos, bond-servant) refers to what is not optional but needful (binding) out of intrinsic
necessity or inevitability. Dei refers to inward constraint
which is why it is often translated "must".
Dei describes that which is under the necessity of
happening or which must necessarily take place, and as stated above,
conveys a sense of inevitability. To express the sense of
necessity dei is translated "one ought", "one should",
"one has to"
or "one must".
In English dictionaries must
means to be obliged and expresses both physical and moral necessity or
insistence. Must speaks of something that should not be
overlooked or missed. Must is used to indicate requirement by
immediate or future need or purpose.
Dei is used 98x in the NT (Mt
16:21; 17:10; 18:33; 23:23; 24:6; 25:27; 26:35, 54; Mk. 8:31; 9:11;
13:7, 10, 14; 14:31; Lk 2:49; 4:43; 9:22; 11:42; 12:12; 13:14, 16, 33;
15:32; 17:25; 18:1; 19:5; 21:9; 22:7, 37; 24:7, 26, 44; Jn. 3:7, 14, 30;
4:4, 20, 24; 9:4; 10:16; 12:34; 20:9; Acts 1:16, 21; 3:21; 4:12; 5:29;
9:6, 16; 14:22; 15:5; 16:30; 17:3; 19:21, 36; 20:35; 23:11; 24:19;
25:10, 24; 26:9; 27:21, 24, 26; Ro 1:27; 8:26; 12:3; 1Co 8:2; 11:19;
15:25, 53; 2Co 2:3; 5:10; 11:30; Ep 6:20; Col. 4:4, 6; 1Th 4:1; 2Th 3:7;
1Ti 3:2, 7, 15; 5:13; 2Ti 2:6, 24; Titus 1:7, 11; Heb 2:1; 9:26; 11:6;
1Pe 1:6; 2Pe 3:11; Re 1:1; 4:1; 10:11; 11:5; 17:10; 20:3; 22:6)
The NASB translates dei as follows: due(1), had(7), have(2), must(56),
necessary(4), needed(1), ought(17), ought to(1), should(9).
The TDNT comments
that dei
expresses the character of necessity or compulsion
in an event. The term itself does not denote the authority which imparts
this character. It is thus given its precise significance when conjoined
with this power. In most cases the word bears a weakened sense derived
from everyday processes. It thus denotes that which in a given moment
seems to be necessary or inevitable to a man or group of men...In the
language of philosophy the term expresses logical and scientific
necessities...Ethical or even religious obligations may also be denoted (as used here in Titus 1:7).
(Kittel,
G., Friedrich, G., & Bromiley, G. W. Theological Dictionary of the New
Testament. Eerdmans)
In regard to overseers the
verb "must"
(dei) expresses the moral fitness (in the 15 or so
characteristics that follow) that is absolutely necessary
in order for one to qualify to lead the local church. In Paul's first
epistle to Timothy, he used dei twice in his description
of qualifications for an overseer, writing that
An overseer, then, must be (dei) above
reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable,
hospitable, able to teach, 3 not addicted to wine or pugnacious, but
gentle, uncontentious, free from the love of money. 4 He must be one who
manages his own household well, keeping his children under control with
all dignity 5 (but if a man does not know how to manage his own
household, how will he take care of the church of God?); 6 and not a new
convert, lest he become conceited and fall into the condemnation
incurred by the devil. 7 And he must (dei) have a
good reputation with those outside the church, so that he may not fall
into reproach and the snare of the devil.
(1Ti 3:2-7)
In his second epistle Paul emphasized that
"the Lord's bond-servant
(of whom elders, overseers and deacons would surely classify) must (dei) not be
quarrelsome, but be kind to all, able to teach, patient when wronged..."
(see note
2 Timothy 2:24)
Paul uses dei once more in Titus in reference to
"rebellious men,
empty talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision, who must (dei) be
silenced because they are upsetting whole families, teaching things they
should not teach, for the sake of sordid gain." (see note
Titus 1:10;
Titus 1:11)
Paul is clearly instructing Titus that it is a
must and not an option that he silence these rebels!
Dei can refer to that
which is divinely destined or decreed as illustrated by the following NT
passages. Jesus declared that “the gospel must (dei) first be preached to all the nations." (Mk
13:10) Before the end of this age (and prior to the 1000 year
reign of Messiah) there must be (because Jesus declared it
so) a worldwide proclamation of the gospel which may refer to the
supernatural proclamation of the gospel (Revelation 14:6
{note};
Revelation Lectures
Pt 2,
Pt 3,
Pt 4;
Resources on Revelation;
Summary Charts of Revelation Chapters
4-22)
at the mid-point of the last 7 year period of Daniel's Seventieth Week
(see
Chart of Daniel's 70th Week;
Daniel
Lectures), just before God pours out His final
wrath on the kingdom of the Anti-Christ and rebellious mankind
(referring especially to the "bowl judgments" as described in
Rev 16).
In another use of dei we read
For
as yet they (Jesus' disciples) did not understand the Scripture,
that He must (dei) rise again from the dead. (Jn 20:9).
Peter declared
And there is salvation in no one
else; for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among
men, by which we must (dei) be saved” (Acts 4:12) (Comment: Referring to the only way of salvation
which is by faith in Jesus Christ)
For salvation one absolutely MUST enter
the small gate and travel the narrow road, for it is the only path that
leads to eternal life.
Finally, one more "must" that applies
to all believers is found in Paul's declaration that
we (only
addressing genuine believers) must (dei) all
appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may be
recompensed for his deeds in the body, according to what he has done,
whether good or bad. (2Cor 5:10-note)
Dei is also used in
Scripture to refer to that which is right as prescribed by law,
duty or custom. For example when the Jewish council (the "Sanhedrin")
rebuked Peter (and the apostles) for teaching in the Name of
Jesus, Peter replied
We
must (dei) obey God rather than men. (Acts 5:29)
The point is that
Christians must obey the government authority but only as long as the
rules or decrees of the government are not contrary to God’s Word. Then
they must obey God. Peter
informs his readers that
In this (the benefits of the
salvation, living hope and future inheritance) you
greatly rejoice, even though now for a little while, if
necessary (dei), you have been distressed by various
trials." (1Pe 1:6-note)
The trials of this life are a "must"
for they are God's training ground (His "school of affliction") for our life in the future in
eternity.
The following passage presents an
excellent sense of the "binding" nature of the verb dei
and helps one understand how strong Paul feels about the qualifications
for overseers! As Jesus' time
to be offered as the sacrificial Lamb approached, He
began to show His
disciples that He must go to
Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and
scribes, and be killed, and be raised up on the third day"
(Mt 16:21)
Dei emphasizes the inevitableness of the Cross, because it
was for this very
purpose Jesus took the form of man and He was constrained to
fulfill His purpose (cf Jn 4:34, 17:4).
Dei in fact is often used by
Jesus regarding His work and it's inevitable fulfillment on the Cross of
Calvary. (eg, Mark 8:31; Luke 4:43; 9:22; 13:33; 24:7, 26; John
3:14; 12:34)
In summary, dei means ‘it is
necessary’, ‘one must,’ or ‘one ought,’ and is used...
(a) of a necessity lying in
the nature of the case. (Jn 3:30-note;
2Ti 2:6-note) A familiar OT use of
dei in this sense (one of 23 uses in the Septuagint) is Boaz's declaration to
the nearest kinsman redeemer that
On the day you buy the field from the
hand of Naomi, you
must
(dei) also
acquire Ruth the Moabitess, the widow of the deceased, in order to raise
up the name of the deceased on his inheritance." (Ru 4:5-note)
Comment:
The nearest kinsman knew that was a necessity, not an option, and
therefore he gave up his right to Ruth!
(b) of necessity brought about by circumstances,
(John 4:4) and regarding Christ speaking of a necessity brought about by
reason of the Father’s will (Luke 2:49)
(c) of necessity as to what is
required that something may be brought about, (Acts 9:6); In
Hebrews we read
And without faith it is impossible to
please Him, for he who comes to God
must
(dei) believe
that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who seek Him."
(He 11:6-note)
(d) of a necessity of law,
duty, equity, custom (Acts 25:10, Acts 15:5,
Ro 12:3
{note},
Lk 22:7)
(e) of necessity arising from the sovereign will of God, (Mt
16:21; Mt 24:6; 1Cor 15:53) One of the most famous illustrations is John
record of
The Revelation of
Jesus Christ, which God gave Him (Jesus) to show to His bond-servants, the
things which must shortly take place; and He sent and
communicated it by His angel to His bond-servant John." (see Rev
1:1-note, see also see
Re 4:1, 20:6, 22:6
notes
Re 4:1,
20:6,
22:6)
Comment: These things (the
incredible events in the Revelation of Jesus Christ) must
happen because the sovereign God decreed them to happen. (cp God's
declaration's that speak of His sovereign control of history in Isaiah -
Is 42:9, 46:9, 10, 11, Isa 48:3)
Note that dei conveys a
slightly different meaning than does the closely related verb opheilo (3784)
which means “to owe, to be a debtor, to be under obligation or bound
by duty”.
Opheilo speaks of a moral
obligation in contrast to a binding necessity as brought out with dei. For example, Paul uses
opheílo
writing to the Romans:
I am under obligation (noun form of opheílo) both to Greeks and to barbarians,
both to the wise and to the foolish." (Ro 1:14-note)
The apostle saw himself as a debtor to those who
spoke Greek and to those who did not. The word opheilo
refers to a special, personal or moral obligation to do something, in
contrast to the basic meaning of dei, which speaks of a
necessity, something that must be accomplished.
From this overview of dei and
above reproach one can
better understand that the candidate for overseer must possesses these traits
in the following list and if he does not he must not be appointed an overseer.
Spiritual leaders not only must
teach truth but also
must live
out the truth in their life as examples of
godliness to their flock. Damage to the leader’s
reputation is damage to God’s reputation.
In short, the verb dei speaks of what is
necessary, not optional -- once you understand that dei
has no "option clauses", Peter's solemn pronouncement is even more sobering:
Since all these things are to be
destroyed in this way, what sort of people
ought
(dei) you to be in holy
conduct and godliness, looking for and hastening the coming of the day
of God, on account of which the heavens will be destroyed by burning,
and the elements will melt with intense heat!" (2Pe 3:11, 12-note)
Peter's exclamation means “How astoundingly
excellent you ought to be!” which is a no nonsense,
straightforward challenge regarding the necessity for Christians to conform their lives to
God’s standards in light of the coming judgment and relative brevity of
this world compared that which is to come.
If you really understand the NT implications of dei, you
will agree that holy conduct and godliness are a necessity not an option!
Above reproach (410)(anegkletos
[word study]
or anenkletos from a = without, negative particle +
egkaleo/enkaleo {en = in + kaleo = call} = to call in {as a debt or
demand}, to bring to account, to accuse in court, call into account,
bring a charge against - in Ro 8:33
[note]
"who will bring a charge [egkaleo] against God's elect?..." The
answer "no one") means not arraigned (as in a court), that which
cannot be called to account, unblamable, blameless, irreproachable, free
from accusation or reproach, not accused of having done anything wrong.
Anegkletos - 5x in 5v - 1 Cor
1:8; Col 1:22; 1 Tim 3:10; Titus 1:6, 7. NAS = above reproach(2),
beyond reproach(2), blameless(1).
Using a modern colloquialism such a
person has "no skeletons in the closet"!
Too often in American churches the
leaders (and elders) are selected because of money, influence or
availability, with little regard to whether they have walked blamelessly
before the Lord. Better to select a leader above reproach than a
popular one!
Anegkletos signifies that which cannot be called to account. It means having no
blot on one's life for which one could be accused, arraigned, and
disqualified. It means there is nothing laid to one’s
charge (as the result of public investigation). It is not simply an
acquittal but the absence of even a valid accusation.
Steven Cole...
The term “above reproach” is used in
Titus 1:6 and Titus 1:7, first to sum up a man’s home life and again to
sum up his personal character. The Greek word in Titus is different than
the word in 1Ti 3:2, although the meaning is essentially the same. It
means that there is nothing in the man’s life for which a charge or
accusation could be brought against him (see R. C. Trench, Synonyms of
the New Testament [Eerdmans], p. 381). He is a man of integrity. He
doesn’t live one way at church and another way at home. His wife and
children would affirm that he displays the fruit of the Spirit at home.
If he sins, he is quick to confess it and ask forgiveness. (Read
the full sermon)
Philip Towner explained it best (IVP NT Commentary
Series)
blameless (KJV translation) is more a measure of wholeness and
balance than of perfection. The code examines all dimensions of life for
evidence of the Spirit’s influence in each part. This kind of balanced
“reading” means development toward maturity is under way. And Paul felt
that “whole” believers were best suited for church leadership.
Albert Barnes (1798-1870)
says that believers must
live...
In holy conduct and piety. That is,
this fact ought to be allowed to exert a deep and abiding influence on
us, to induce us to lead holy lives. We should feel that there is
nothing permanent on the earth that this is not our abiding home; and
that our great interests are in another world. We should be serious,
humble, and prayerful; and should make it our great object to be
prepared for the solemn scenes through which we are soon to pass. An
habitual contemplation of the truth, that all that we see is soon to
pass away, would produce a most salutary effect on the mind. It would
make us serious. It would repress ambition. It would lead us not to
desire to accumulate what must so soon be destroyed. It would prompt us
to lay up our treasures in heaven. It would cause us to ask with deep
earnestness whether we are prepared for these amazing scenes, should
they suddenly burst upon us." (Barnes' Notes on the Bible)
IMPACT OF
A LIFE
ABOVE REPROACH
Illustration of a life that was
"above reproach" - The Christian walk of Will Houghton, a preacher
who became the president of Moody Bible Institute during the 1940s,
played a large role in the conversion of an agnostic who was
contemplating suicide. The skeptic was desperate, but he decided
that if he could find a minister who lived his faith he would listen to
him. So he hired a private detective to watch Houghton. When the
investigator’s report came back, it revealed that this preacher’s life
was above reproach; he was for real. The agnostic went to Houghton’s
church, accepted Christ, and later sent his daughter to Moody Bible
Institute.
Steward (3623)
(oikonomos from oíkos = house + némo
= manage, distribute, dispense) (see
study of related word
oikonomia) is literally the manager or
superintendent of a household or estate.
Oikonomos
is used 10 times in the NT -- Lk 12:42; 16:1, 3, 8; Ro 16:23; 1Co 4:1,
2; Gal 4:2; Titus 1:7; 1Pe 4:10-note
There are 12 uses
in the
Septuagint (LXX)
- 1Ki 4:6; 16:9; 18:3;
2Ki 18:18, 37; 19:2; 1Chr. 29:6; Esther 1:8; 8:9; Is 36:3, 22; 37:2.
Vincent adds that in the Greek culture
the steward
was the one who
assigns to the members of the household their several duties, and pays
to each his wages. The paymaster. He kept the household stores under
lock and seal, giving out what was required; and for this purpose
received a signet-ring from his master."
Although stewards
usually were slaves or freedmen (former slaves), as Vincent notes many
had considerable responsibility and authority. In addition to caring for
all the needs of family members, they could be responsible and
accountable for household finances and for making sure, for example,
that crops were properly planted, cultivated, and harvested. They often
had oversight of all other household servants, to provide for them and
to assign and supervise their work. They would make sure that those who
were sick or wounded were cared for and even dispensed discipline when
necessary.
The overseer as "God's
steward"
does not own the church or the people of the church. But he is in charge
of their spiritual nourishment, growth and behavior. God's steward
must see that the household of God is cared for and looked after and
that their energies and lives are directed to the will of the Master.
The steward must do the will of the Master, carrying out His Word
without any deviation whatsoever.
The
steward
was appointed by (cf Acts 20:28, 13:2)
and accountable to the owner, the Owner in this verse being God and the
"house" being His "sheep", the local body of believers who probably did
meet in houses rather than formal church structures.
Because the "overseer"
is "God's
steward", he
is directly accountable to Him and thus he must conform to the highest
moral and spiritual standards. Other uses of "steward"
(or "stewardship") give us a good picture of what God expects from the
overseer. Thus, a
steward
must not squander what has been entrusted to him (Lk 16:1 16:2), in the
present context the care of God's "sheep". Paul described himself,
Apollo and Cephas as
servants of Christ and stewards
of the mysteries of God"
and that "moreover it is required of stewards that one be
found trustworthy (dependable,
reliable, faithful)." (1Cor 4:1
4.2)
So one of the most important characteristic of a steward is
faithfulness. (cf
Mt 24:45)
He must use what his master gives him for the good and glory of his
master, and not for himself personally. The idea is that he take
scrupulous care of that which was entrusted to him, and give it out to
others faithfully and as directed by his master Jesus Christ.
And finally in an
exhortation that applies to overseers and to all believers Peter wrote
that
As each one has received a special gift (spiritual
gift), employ it in serving one another, as good stewards
of the manifold grace of God."
(see note
1 Peter 4:10,
cf "stewardship
of God's grace which was given to"
Paul;
cp Ephesians 3:2-note).
Wiersbe adds
that
The elder must never say, “This is mine!” All that he has comes from God
(Jn 3:27) and must be used for God. His time, possessions, ambitions,
and talents are all loaned to him by the Lord; and he must be faithful
to use them to honor God and build the church. Of course, all Christians
ought to be faithful stewards, and not the pastors only! (Wiersbe,
W: Bible Exposition Commentary. 1989. Victor)
Bengel adds that
The greater the master is, the greater the virtues required in His
servant.
NOT
SELF-WILLED: me authade: (Ge 49:6; 2Pe 2:10)
not self-pleased (YLT)
not overbearing (NIV)
not be arrogant (NLT)
not headstrong (Darby)
must not be bossy (CEV)
not pushing himself forward (BBE)
must not be aggressive (Phillips)
must not be obstinately self-willed
(Barclay)
not over-fond of having his own way (Weymouth)
not self-willed or arrogant or presumptuous (Amp)
he must not be presumptuous (Moffatt)
Each of the following
negative traits is preceded by “not” (Gk = me) and should be
considered explanatory of Paul’s fundamental qualification of
“above reproach.”
Self
willed
(829)
(authades
from autós = self + hedomai
= to delight in, take pleasure, English word = "hedonist")
is literally delighting one's self and describes
a man who has a self loving, self seeking spirit, who is so pleased with himself that nothing else pleases
him and he cares to please nobody. He is preoccupation with his own
interests. His is so dominated by self–interest and lack of
consideration of others, that he arrogantly asserts his own will He
is self-satisfied, self-centered, self-complacent, arrogant, proud, haughty,
stubborn, willful, inflexible, presumptuous, unaccommodating, harsh,
despising others, dictatorial, dogmatic, impatient of contradiction, and
unyielding. In his self-loving spirit, he seeks only to gratify self and
is regardless of others. (cf 2Ti 3:1; 2-note; 2Ti
3:3; 4; 5-note)
Steven Cole...
The word literally means,
“self-pleasing.” It refers to a man who obstinately maintains his own
opinion or asserts his own rights and does not care about the rights,
feelings, and interests of others (Trench, Synonyms, p. 349). The
self-willed man often takes the contrary view because he loves to assert
himself and wield power over others. He never admits that he was wrong.
He is not a team player. If he acts in such self-willed ways in the
church or with other elders, you can assume that he runs his family like
a drill sergeant. Don’t make him an elder! (Read
the full sermon)
Barclay says that authades
literally means
pleasing himself" and "The man who is
authades has been described as the man who is so pleased
with himself that nothing else pleases him and he cares to please
nobody...The Greek ethical writers had much to say about this fault of
authadeia. Aristotle set on the one extreme the man who pleases
everybody (areskos), and on the other extreme the man who pleases nobody
(authades), and between them the man who had in his life a proper
dignity (semnos). He said of the authades that he was the man who
would not converse or associate with any man. Eudemus said that the
authades was the man who “regulates his life with no respect to
others, but who is contemptuous.” Euripides said of him that he was
“harsh to his fellow citizens through want of culture.” Philodemus
said that his character was compounded in equal parts of conceit,
arrogance and contemptuousness. His conceit made him think too highly of
himself; his contemptuousness made him think too meanly of others; and
his arrogance made him act on his estimate of himself and others. Clearly the man who is
authades is an unpleasant character. He is
intolerant, condemning everything that he cannot understand and thinking
that there is no way of doing anything except his. Such a quality, as
Lock said, “is fatal to the rule of free men.” No man of contemptuous
and arrogant intolerance is fit to be an office-bearer of the Church.
(Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press)
R. C. Trench said of such a man
that,
he obstinately maintains his own opinion, or asserts his own
rights, while he is reckless of the rights, opinions and interests of
others...(he so far overvalues) any determination at
which he has himself (has) once arrived, that he will not be
removed from it"...In some sinful men their authadeia
(related noun form), the ungracious bearing towards others, the
self-pleasing which is best pleased when it displeases others, is the
leading feature of their character. (Trench,
R. C. Synonyms of the New Testament. Hendrickson Publishers. 2000)
Trench goes on to liken
the selfish man to the hedgehog, which, rolling itself up in a ball,
presents only sharp spines to those without, keeping at the same time
all the soft and warm wool for itself within."! (Ibid)
The authades man is overbearing (NIV) and always seeking
to "have his own way" (Weymouth).
Vine says
that authades
denotes one who, dominated by self-interest
and inconsiderate of others, arrogantly asserts his own
will, one who
persists in his own determination. It is the opposite of “gentle”.
(Vine,
W. Collected writings of W. E. Vine. Nashville: Thomas Nelson
)
The overseer should
not to think more highly of himself than he
ought to think; but to think so as to have sound judgment (see
note
Romans 12:3)
Further the
overseer should be like Christ Who said
not My will, but Thine be done (Lk
22:42,
cf Php 2:3; 4-note;
Php 2:5; 6; 7-note
;1Pe 5:1, 2; 3-note;
1Pe 5:4; 5:5 -
note)
Overseers are to be benevolent
leaders not brutal dictators.
Hiebert says the overseer should not
have
a self-loving spirit which seeks to gratify self in arrogant disregard
of others.
The overseer should be one who
does not insist on having his own way. He should be flexible
in his opinions, considerate of other viewpoints and sensitive to use
authority in ways that truly promote God’s work and not his selfish,
personal agenda.
Self-willed
overseers (and pastors) are overbearing, arrogant, and refuse to take
people’s suggestions and criticisms, acting more like dictators then
spiritually mature leaders, refusing to take other's suggestions and
criticisms.
Peter ascribes this trait to false
teachers as
"those who indulge the flesh in its corrupt desires and
despise authority. Daring, self-willed, they do not tremble when
they revile angelic majesties." (2Pe 2:10-note).
Albert Barnes says authades
means,
properly, self-complacent; and then, assuming, arrogant, imperious;
Robinson, Lexicon - The gist of the offence - the very “head and front”
- is that of being self-complacent; a trait of character which, of
necessity, makes a man imperious (marked by arrogant assurance), dogmatical, impatient of contradiction, and unyielding. Such a man,
evidently, is not fit for the office of a minister of the gospel."
Matthew Henry adds what
A great honour it is to a minister not to be thus affected, to be ready
to ask and to take advice, to be ready to defer as much as reasonably
may be to the mind and will of others, becoming all things to all men,
that they may gain some.
Do your spiritual leaders accept constructive
(emphasis on constructive) criticism? Or better yet if you are a leader
reading this - How do you receive criticism? Like Christ?
(cp 1Pe 2:21 -
note)
MacArthur comments that
Authades is an unusually strong adjective
denoting an arrogant
self-interest that asserts its own will with utter disregard for how
others might be affected. Proud self-interest is, in one way or another,
the root of all sin, because it not only disregards the interests and
welfare of other people but, even more important, disregards God’s will
and replaces His purpose and glory with man’s...The world usually looks
to the aggressive, self-assertive person for leadership. But those
characteristics disqualify a man for leadership in the church, where a
self-willed man has no place. Every believer, and certainly every church
leader, must continually fight the battle against fleshly self-will,
self-fulfillment, and self-glory. (MacArthur.
Titus: Moody Press)
MacDonald adds that
If a man is headstrong, obstinately right with no possibility that those
who differ might be, if he is unyielding and impatient of contradiction,
then he is unsuited to be a spiritual leader. An elder is a moderator,
not a dogmatic autocrat.
(MacDonald,
W., & Farstad, A. Believer's Bible Commentary: Old and New Testaments.
Nashville: Thomas Nelson)
Clarke
adds that the overseer is
Not one who is determined to have his own way in every thing; setting up
his own judgment to that of all others; expecting all to pay homage to
his understanding. Such a governor in the Church of God can do little
good, and may do much mischief.
NOT
QUICK-TEMPERED: me orgilon: (Pr 14:17; 15:18; 16:32; Eccl 7:9;
Jas 1:19, 20)
irritable (GWT)
not quickly moved to wrath or blows
(BBE)
not...hot-tempered (Phillips)
must not be an angry man (Barclay)
not a man of a passionate temper
(Weymouth)
not soon angry (KJV)
not "irascible" (marked by hot temper and
easily provoked anger) (Vincent)
Quick
tempered
(3711) (orgilos
from orge = anger, wrath) soon angry, prone to anger, easily "inflamed",
inclined to anger, hotheaded, irascible (marked by hot temper and easily
provoked to anger). This
trait describes a man who does not have his passion of anger under
control. The idea is not one who is prone to just occasional outbursts, but
who has a continual propensity to anger.
Paul is saying that the
overseer is one who should not be "touchy". The quick-tempered person is
easily provoked because he has a “short fuse”. This trait describes
headstrong, obstinate individuals who always want to have their own way
regardless of the consequences, and are contemptuous or look down on
others.
Orgilos is translated "uncontentious" in (1Ti 3:3)
Hotheaded individuals speak and act without thinking and end up hurting
others, something the overseer must never do, but is also true for all
believers. We must also manifest the fruit of the Spirit, exhibiting
self-control, the opposite of quick tempered.
Steven Cole...
A quick-tempered man is always a
spark away from blowing up. He uses anger to intimidate or control
others to get his own way. He is also usually a self-willed man. Jas
1:19, 20 commands, “But let everyone be quick to hear, slow to speak and
slow to anger; for the anger of man does not achieve the righteousness
of God.” Patience, kindness, and self-control are fruit of the Spirit
that should govern a spiritually mature man. (Read
the full sermon)
Barclay notes that
"There are
two Greek words for anger. There is thumos, which is the
anger that quickly blazes up and just as quickly subsides, like a fire
in straw. There is orgē, the noun connected with orgilos,
and it means inveterate (firmly established by long persistence) anger.
It is not the anger of the sudden blaze, but the wrath which a man
nurses to keep it warm. A blaze of anger is an unhappy thing; but this
long-lived, purposely maintained anger is still worse. The man who
nourishes his anger against any man is not fit to be an office-bearer of
the Church." (Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press)
Aristotle wrote that the "orgilos"
men are
quick-tempered persons (who) lose no time being angry, and do so with
those they ought not, over things they ought not, and far more than they
ought.
Someone has aptly said that temper
is such a wonderful thing that it’s a shame to lose it. That's Paul's
advice for prospective elders and overseers. Do not be easily provoked.
Keep your passion under control. Remember that one of the
characteristics of love is that it is "not provoked" (see
1Co 13:5-note)
but is willing to endure slights and insults. The overseer exhibits this
love which is not irritable or touchy, but which absorbs offenses,
insults, and inconveniences for the sake of others’ welfare.
The overseer is to be
mild, yielding and tender so that "no unwholesome (corrupt,
putrefying, disgusting, "rotten") word" proceeds from his mouth
but only such a word as is good for edification according to the need of
the moment, that it may give grace to those who hear. (Ep 4:29-note)
Matthew Henry
adds
"How
unfit are those to govern a church who cannot govern themselves, or
their own turbulent and unruly passions! The minister must be meek and
gentle, and patient towards all men."
As
Paul wrote to Timothy (who was probably
overseeing" the Ephesian
church) "the Lord's bond-servant must not be quarrelsome.
(see 2Ti 2:24 ; 25-note; Ep 4:26-note)
James reminds us all that
the anger of man does not accomplish the righteousness of God (Jas 1:20-note)
A righteous man
ought to get angry when wrongs are done - get angry at the right time!
On the other hand, as someone has counseled,
“Temper is such a wonderful thing that it’s a shame to lose it.”
The
Septuagint (LXX)
has two instructive uses of orgilos in the book of Proverbs
where we read that we are not to
associate with a man given to anger or go
with a hot-tempered man (orgilos)" (Pr 22:24)
because "an angry man stirs up strife, and a
hot-tempered (orgilos) man abounds in transgression. (Pr
29:22)
If a man otherwise qualified as
overseer is prone to a volatile temperament, he has learned to bridle
it. If he has a hot temper, he never lets it show. In sum, long-lived,
purposely maintained, even nourished anger makes a man unfit to be an
overseer. A man who cannot control his emotions will have difficulty
leading others and exercising proper judgment over church matters,
especially those associated with strong feelings. This qualification
does not mean the overseer cannot have strong personal feelings on
certain issues but does prohibit an impulsive or divisive reaction that
would do more to complicate the problem than to solve it.
The overseer should
be "quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger" (James
1:19-note)
for this shows him to be a man of understanding and fit to teach others,
which an
angry man is not.
A man's discretion makes him slow to anger, and it is his glory to
overlook a transgression (Pr 19:11)
The Jewish Rabbi
Hillel taught that
neither one that is ashamed (to ask questions) learns well, nor one that
is "angry" teaches well'
Keathley adds that
This issue here is not the presence of anger for there are times when we
ought to be angry (Ep 4:26-note).
Rather, this is describing the man who has a “short fuse” and it is a
condition that is certainly related to being also self-willed. When is
anger sinful? It is sinful when it occurs for the wrong reasons, when it
rises too quickly, and when it explodes in uncontrollable behavior. We
are not simply to count to ten and then let it fly. A man who is prone
to anger is a walking time bomb just waiting to explode.
Solomon
adds these words of wisdom concerning anger...
He who is slow to anger has
great understanding, but he who is quick-tempered exalts folly." (Pr
14:29)
A
hot-tempered man stirs up strife, but the slow to anger pacifies
contention." (Pr 15:18)
A
man’s discretion makes him slow to anger, and it is his glory to
overlook a transgression." (Pr 19:11)
The
beginning of strife is like letting out water, so abandon the quarrel
before it breaks out."
(Pr 17:14).
NOT ADDICTED
TO WINE: me paroinon: (Titus 2:3; Lv 10:9; Pr 31:4,5; Is 28:7;
56:12; Ezek 44:21; Ep 5:18; 1Ti 3:3)
must not drink too much (GWT)
must not be a heavy drinker (NLT)
not...over fond of wine (Phillips)
must not be given to drunken and outrageous conduct (Barclay)
nor a hard drinker (Weymouth)
not present at wine (Hiebert)
Addicted
to wine (3943)
(paroinos
from para = beside, near + oinos
= wine) is literally " tarrying at wine" (Vine), one who stays
near, continually alongside or in the presence of wine. The picture is
of
a man who always has a bottle (wineskin) on
the table indicating his addiction (cf 1Ti 3:3)
Paroinos
although literally referring to over-indulgence widened in meaning
eventually describing all conduct which was outrageous. It was used to
describe the one who tends to be quarrelsome because he habitually
drinks too much.
To paraphrase
Marvin Vincent, this is the man one who behaves ill at wine or who
treats others with drunken violence.
The Jews used it
of the conduct of fellow Jews who married Midianite women. It describes
the character of the man who, even in his sober moments, acts with the
outrageousness of a drunken man!
The Christian leaders’
behavior must not be confused with the drunken worship of Dionysus
(Greek mythological god of wine and fruitfulness worshipped with
orgiastic rites) which was practiced by Cretans.
Those “given to wine” were also often pugnacious, abusive and given to
fighting as well.
Steven Cole...
“Wine” includes all alcoholic
beverages. The Bible does not prohibit drinking alcoholic beverages, but
it does warn about the dangers of wine and strong drink, especially for
leaders (Pr 20:1; 23:29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35; 31:4, 5). Drunkenness
and addiction to alcohol are always sinful (Ep 5:18; Ro 13:13; 1Pe 4:3;
1Co 6:12). Church leaders must be especially careful so that they do not
cause younger believers to stumble. If a younger believer, who formerly
had a problem with drinking, sees me drinking, and my example causes him
to fall back into his former ways, I am to some extent responsible. Thus
if an elder chooses to drink at all, he must be careful and keep in mind
his position as an example to the flock. (Read
the full sermon)
MacDonald adds that
While total abstinence is not demanded in the word, there is one
situation in which refraining is called for, namely, when drinking wine
would offend a weaker brother or cause him to stumble (see Romans 14:21-note). This is the overriding consideration which causes great numbers of
Christians in North American to abstain from alcohol entirely.
With the elder, the question is not the total prohibition of wine, but
rather the excessive use of wine, which leads to brawling." (MacDonald,
W., & Farstad, A. Believer's Bible Commentary: Old and New Testaments.
Nashville: Thomas Nelson)
Proverbs adds these wise words for those who would seek to oversee
others
It is not for kings...to drink wine or for rulers to desire strong
drink, lest they drink and forget what is decreed, and pervert the
rights of all the afflicted." (Pr 31:4,5)
Matthew Henry
writes
that there
is no greater reproach on a minister than to be a wine-bibber, one who
loves it, and gives himself undue liberty this way who continues at the
wine or strong drink till it inflames him."
The
overseer should
not get drunk with wine, for that is dissipation, but be (continually)
filled with the Spirit" so that he be able to speak to others "in psalms
and hymns and spiritual songs. (Ep 5:18, 19-see notes
Ep 5:18;
19)
NOT
PUGNACIOUS: me plekten:
be a violent person (GWT)
a striker (YLT)
bullies (CEV)
he must not be a man ready to come to blows (Barclay)
Pugnacious
(4131)
(plektes from plesso = to strike) is literally a striker (one who hits another
with force), a fist fighter and figuratively one who is a violent, contentious and
quarrelsome.
In the
only other Biblical use of plektes Paul says that overseers are not to
be...
1Timothy 3:3 addicted to wine
or pugnacious, but gentle, uncontentious, free from the love of
money.
The Greeks widened the meaning to include not only physical violence,
but also "violence" in speech so that plektes came to mean
one who "browbeats" others -- isn't it true that
words often strike harder than fists! It is possible to hurt a person
more deeply and permanently with cruel words than with a fist. So true!
The man who abandons love and resorts to violence of action or of speech
is not fit to be an overseer. The overseer is to be a man who avoids retaliation, no matter how
cruelly provoked, instead seeking to
settle all conflicts peacefully, reasonably, and without animosity.
Paul's instruction is to be his byword so that “if possible, so far
as it depends on" the overseer, he is to "be at peace with
all men” (Ro 12:18-note).
One
would think that this prohibition to retaliate would be unnecessary but
apparently it was not uncommon in NT times for grown men to settle
disputes with their fist fights. In the early church there seem to have
been over-zealous overseers who chastised erring members with physical
violence, for we find written prohibitions in the Apostolic Canons such
as
"We
order that the bishop who strikes an erring believer should be deposed."
Pelagius says:
He cannot strike anyone who is the disciple of that Christ who, being
struck, returned no answering blow." (Adapted from Barclay)
Christian leaders
must
(here is that verb dei again -- this is not an option beloved!) not be quarrelsome, but be kind to all,
able to teach, patient when wronged (putting up with
evil, forbearing),
with gentleness correcting those who are in opposition, if perhaps God
may grant them repentance leading to the knowledge of the truth” (2Ti
2:24, 25-note).
Steven Cole...
Being pugnacious means physically
hitting others. But it may legitimately be expanded to refer to a man
who is verbally combative. It should be needless to say that an elder
should never strike anyone, especially his wife or children. If he must
spank his child, he exercises control and does not abuse the child. I
think that it is always wrong to strike a child in the face or to spank
when you’re angry. The older the child, the more you use reason and the
less you use spanking. The point is, an elder should not be a man who
solves conflict by hitting others or being an aggressive bully.. (Read
the full sermon)
NOT FOND OF
SORDID GAIN: me aischrokerde: (Is 56:10;11 1Ti 3:3, 3:8;1Pe 5:2)
must not use shameful ways to make money (GWT)
not given to filthy lucre (YLT)
not pursuing dishonest gain (NIV)
not greedy for money (NKJV)
not greedy of filthy lucre (KJV)
he must not be a person who always tries to get rich by cheating people
(ICB)
dishonest in business (CEV)
he must not be a seeker of gain in disgraceful ways (Barclay)
he must not be grasping and greedy for filthy lucre (financial gain)
(Amp)
not eager for shameful gain (Hiebert)
not greedy of shameful gain (Robertson)
Fond of sordid gain
(146) (aischrokerdes
from aischrós = filthy, shameful, indecent, dishonorable +
kerdos = gain, profit) is shamelessly greedy, avaricious
(excessively acquisitive especially in seeking to hoard riches), a seeker of gain in disgraceful
ways. It describes a man who does not care how he makes money so long as
he makes it.
Note that the root is
used in the following section describing rebellious men, et al
"who
must be silenced because they are upsetting whole families, teaching
things they should not teach, for the sake of sordid (aischrós
- shameful, indecent, dishonorable) gain." (Titus 1:11-note)
The overseer is not to
be not given to improper gain for selfish purposes and specifically is
not to use his office as a means of accumulating unjust gain. To be sure, the
laborer is worthy of his hire, but
church leadership is never to be used to make money. The overseer
is not to be eager for gain, especially gain that degrades his moral
character. He is not to be like those who, without honesty or integrity,
seek wealth and financial prosperity at any cost.
Steven Cole...
In 1Ti 3:3, Paul states that he “must
be free from the love of money.” Money itself is not evil, but it is
dangerous. It is like a loaded gun—it can be very useful if you use it
properly, but it can hurt others or yourself if you use it carelessly. A
greedy man is not qualified to be an elder, because greedy men are not
godly. They will be tempted to take advantage of people financially or
to embezzle church funds. (Read
the full sermon)
Aischrokerdes
aptly described many Cretans who did not care how they made money so
long as they made it.
Polybius adds that
They are so given to making gain in disgraceful and acquisitive ways
that among the Cretans alone of all men no gain is counted disgraceful."
Plutarch said that Cretans stuck to money like bees to honey. The
Cretans counted material gain far above honesty and honor. If an
overseers main aim in life is to amass material things, irrespective of
how he does so, is not fit to be an office-bearer of the Christian
Church. (Barclay)
Peter instructs leaders
shepherd the flock of God among you,
exercising oversight not under compulsion, but voluntarily, according to
the will of God; and not for sordid gain, but with eagerness"
(1Pe 5:2-note)
Paul warned Timothy of the arrival in the church of
men of depraved
mind and deprived of the truth, who suppose that godliness is a means
of gain." (1Ti 6:5)
Peter warned about false teachers who
"in their greed... will
exploit you with false words (NLT has "will make up clever lies
to get hold of your money")" (see 2Pe 2:3-note)
and who forsook "the right way...gone astray... (and) followed
the way of Balaam, the son of Beor, who loved the wages of
unrighteousness." (see 2Pe 2:15-note).
Paul alludes again to this problem in Crete adding that
there are
many rebellious men, empty talkers and deceivers, especially those of
the circumcision...teaching things they should not teach, for the
sake of sordid gain." (Titus 1:10, 11-note)
Ravenous
wolves such as these are clearly not to be allowed to watch over God's
flock.
Ralph Earle observes that
it is a sad commentary on those times that bishops would have to be
warned against such conduct!
Hiebert adds that if a church leader's
mind is simply occupied with amassing of gold he will be too preoccupied
to feed the flock.
Good point! This overseer's attitude toward material wealth ought to be
one of healthy detachment, although not to the point of
irresponsibility.
Samuel
Johnson said, that
the lust of gold, unfeeling and remorseless, is the last corruption of
degenerate man.
A worthy overseer must be
able to say with Paul:
I have coveted no one's silver or gold or clothes. (Acts 20:33, 34, 35).
><> ><> ><>
Our
Daily Bread in a devotional entitled "Marching Into a Closet"
writes...
Author and pastor Stuart Briscoe
writes about a funeral for a war veteran in which the man's military
buddies had a role in the service. The friends requested that the
minister lead them to the casket for a moment of silence. They would
then follow the pastor out a side door.
The plan was carried out with military precision—until the minister
marched them into a broom closet. The soldiers had to make an awkward
retreat.
That pastor made an honest mistake, but it illustrates that leaders must
know where they are going. As go the leaders, so go the followers.
The apostle Paul left Titus on the island of Crete to establish a
witness for Jesus Christ. Titus was to appoint leaders for the growing
band of believers. Except for preaching the gospel, nothing Titus did
for the Christians on Crete was more important than finding the right
leadership for them.
Church leaders are to meet the standards set forth in Titus 1:6, 7, 8, 9 and
guide others to greater maturity in their relationship with Christ. And
followers must lovingly hold their spiritual leaders accountable to
those goals.
Whether you're leading or following, know where you're going—or you may
end up in a closet. —Haddon W. Robinson (Our
Daily Bread, Copyright RBC Ministries, Grand Rapids, MI. Reprinted by
permission. All rights reserved)
Before you follow a leader,
Check his beliefs, and pray;
Be sure he's following Jesus,
And that he knows the way. —Hess
The only leader worth following is one who is following Christ.